janice&fred
·WTH is that supposed to mean (other that the obvious, I'd hope)?
I can't speak for him but to me it means he doesn't have access to easy money.
WTH is that supposed to mean (other that the obvious, I'd hope)?
WTH is that supposed to mean (other that the obvious, I'd hope)?
nice one Stuart! hey do you still have the black dialed 6694 you got from me years ago? I miss that watch!
That was the intention- hence the no offense intended (in parenthesis) to fellow members who have worked for their money
I don’t believe one second that Rolex has been manipulating the supply in any significant or even relevant way.
Out of the entire population, let’s take the top 0.1 percenters.... which would still be 7.8 million of potential customers for a Rolex watch.
Rolex produces say 1 million watches and may be 50% are professional models... say about 500,000 watches, tops per year. So we already have a dramatic inherent supply vs. demand imbalance... which is further compounded by the real (and perceived... similar to the Tulip story) scarcity of the product... which makes it EVEN more appealing. Remember, humans want what they can’t get! Consequence? People hoard them for their pleasure (how many around here have acquired more than 1 Rolex over the last 5 years?), or to flip them (we all know there is a big inventory out there.... but with a mark-up).
Now factor in the further compounding factors:
- influence of social media platforms where people brag about their possessions?
- top quality of the modern product itself (the highest ever with ceramic and the 32xx movements with 72 hour power reserve?) with some timeless designs (Daytona LN, BLRO, Hulk, BLNR, ...)… so MANY (I am certain) repeat customers;
- amazing track record of holding value over time (and a liquid asset too)... which also makes this a safe heaven for adding diversity to one’s financial savings/investments... which is a smart move ahead of a (potential) looming economic downturn… so many additional customers/demand;
- drumbeats from all the Hodinkees of the world in support for Rolex product, which has further reenforced the aura of the brand including in our community of WIS (which was already in the top 3 most recognized brands in the world)… again, an even wider base of customers (new and repeat);
- and on, and on.... and on.
So, YES, there is overall (much!) more demand than ever with a constant supply (although Rolex HAS increased production volumes through longer work hours, including on Saturdays... so much so that people working there are miserable!!)... so there is currently scarcity. Whether one believes it, or not.
It WILL level off at some point, and all the more rapidly of the economy tanks as flippers may possibly run into cash-flow challenges.
No matter what, in the meantime, it is fun to watch, to ponder and to discuss. This thread will make it to 30-40 pages before it gets better. 😉
Everything you listed above existed before the “shortage” began...it’s not really an explanation for what’s going on now...
Do you have proof that says otherwise?
I have proof that someone that used to sell 250+ subs a year at a Rolex boutique now only get about 20 a year to sell
Knowing what you know, if you were forced to come up with a plausible explanation of this that didn’t involve Rolex reducing supply across the board, what would you say? (For example, some have said Rolex is not lowering supply but instead re-directing supply to upcoming/hot markets such as Hong Kong/China, where in the past 3 years there’s been on the magnitude of 20% year-after-year increases in luxury watch sales.)
I’m taking your started point on its own terms as really incredible insight - just wondering what that same insight would say if forced to come up with a credible alternative to global supply reduction
on most Chinese, it’s DJs and same for Omega it’s Constellations.
yes, an interesting factoid I’ve picked up is that, in China, Omega has been the premier “status” brand (well over Rolex), and the Constellations are the lead. Only recently has Rolex been making gains.
also read that, to date, among the reasons for Omega’s primacy over Rolex in China has to do in part to happenstance: in Omega’s favor, some facet’s of the Omega name/symbol are associated with long-standing symbols of wealth/luck; meanwhile, the Rolex naming conventions have in China been poorly translated in unflattering ways: e.g., the “Sea Dweller” is transcribed as the “Sea Monster” (and our unofficial pet names are as a result equally problematic - e.g., our “Hulk” is known in China as “The Green Sea Monster.”