I bought this 2576 Chronometre years ago

Posts
547
Likes
875
And always assumed it was a redial, the spelling of "CHRONOMETER" being a big red flag,. But I've found a couple of others whose script looks very similar, and the cal 343 movement is in near perfect condition. It is, to my knowledge, the only redial (if so) in my collection, and because of that my intent was to sell it. But before I do, I would like confirmation from the experts.


 
Posts
3,595
Likes
13,551
100% redial. Script is completely off in Seamaster alone, -er spelling didnt happen until years ago, it’s very sloppy overall. Look at the 5-min markers in the sub second for example.
 
Posts
547
Likes
875
I think it was your post about this one that was one reason I bought mine. The movement is rare, and IIRC usually found in the Centenary. So despite the dial, it is still a nice piece. But, it now sticks out like a sore thumb compared to my others so off the the Bay it will go.
 
Posts
13,555
Likes
23,503
Yeah the quality just isn’t there. The fonts are wrong, the lume is clearly newer and the spacing of the minute marks is inconsistent