How will the new Planet Ocean influence future Seamaster Diver 300m?

Posts
1,479
Likes
3,000
Durability has never been a concern for me and I'd be equally as annoyed with a dented aluminum bezel as a shattered ceramic. I'd still be replacing it either way, so it's kind of a moot point to me.

I don't think there are better practical options than ceramic for bezels. Synthetic lab grown sapphire is close, but is equally likely to crack with shock forces as ceramic and costs a small fortune for thick large pieces.
Despite wrecking the stainless steel bezel, I personally have never damaged an aluminum bezel insert, but I know it can and does happen. I only have a few ceramic inserts, most of my watches have steel inserts, actually, and I wouldn't use those ceramic component watches like I did the aluminum ones in the day. The best practical material is just not ceramic (or sapphire). It is a fine material, can make a watch look great, but it's a real liability.
 
Posts
637
Likes
1,493
Despite wrecking the stainless steel bezel, I personally have never damaged an aluminum bezel insert, but I know it can and does happen. I only have a few ceramic inserts, most of my watches have steel inserts, actually, and I wouldn't use those ceramic component watches like I did the aluminum ones in the day. The best practical material is just not ceramic (or sapphire). It is a fine material, can make a watch look great, but it's a real liability.

I was worried about scuffing the aluminium insert on my SMP when I got it, but I've had it coming up on eight years now and it still doesn't have any more than the faintest of scratches on it. They're not that precious, thankfully.

If I'm honest though, if I was gonna buy a newer reference, I think I would prefer ceramic. Chances are, any damage that will break a ceramic bezel will dent/gouge aluminium so badly you'd be replacing it regardless, I agree with Dirk063 on that.
 
Posts
1,479
Likes
3,000
I was worried about scuffing the aluminium insert on my SMP when I got it, but I've had it coming up on eight years now and it still doesn't have any more than the faintest of scratches on it. They're not that precious, thankfully.

If I'm honest though, if I was gonna buy a newer reference, I think I would prefer ceramic. Chances are, any damage that will break a ceramic bezel will dent/gouge aluminium so badly you'd be replacing it regardless, I agree with Dirk063 on that.
Yeah, you're likely correct for the SMP. I can only speak of my experience and one very, very different watch, the GSAR. The GSAR has a very prominent bezel and while I damaged the click mechanism twice and warped the bezel itself that second time, the aluminum insert survived without a scratch. I know a ceramic insert would've also been toast probably both times. Do I like ceramic? Yes, matte ceramic the most. I have a few watches with ceramic inserts. I just don't think we should pretend it's the best for purpose or the toughest material you could choose. It looks very, very nice. I also don't think we should be insistent on it. I hate reading, "It should have a ceramic insert for that price." and endless drivel like that. I try and value a watch as an entire design and package.
 
Posts
233
Likes
687
If I would have the power of gods, I will push Omega to use this as a Bible: