How to remove bezel from vintage IWC???

Posts
2,446
Likes
7,040
Hi all,
I recently purchased an IWC watch with the cal. 89 movement, dating from around 1949. Having serviced a few cal. 88 and 89 IWCs in the past, I know their cases can be quite tight and tricky to open. This particular one is especially stubborn.
To remove the movement, I need to take off both the caseback and the bezel. I was able to snap off the caseback, but the bezel has no visible indent or gap where I could insert a case knife.
Does anyone have advice or tips on how to safely remove the bezel on this model?
Thanks in advance for any guidance.


 
Posts
2,446
Likes
7,040
I've not worked on that watch, but I've done similar on other watches. I use an exacto knife in the slight crack to wedge it open a little, so that I can get a case knife into it.

Alternatively, you can use one of those 4 bladed bezel removal tools (ala https://www.esslinger.com/horotec-watch-bezel-remover-tool/), though I've never used one.
That's the point, there is no wedge: the bezel and caseback meet perfectly on the whole perimeter.
 
Posts
1,975
Likes
2,137
That's the point, there is no wedge: the bezel and caseback meet perfectly on the whole perimeter.
Right, I'm not talking about a wedge, you stick a very thin blade in the very fine gap between them to get them apart. Though, perhaps a picture of the side of the watch could be illuminating 😀
 
Posts
1,975
Likes
2,137
Silly question: IF there is no gap to put a thin blade in... are you SURE you have to take the bezel off? The dial seems smaller than the crystal, could this be a case where compressed-air to push out the crystal (or just a lift) could give you the room you need?
 
Posts
2,446
Likes
7,040
could this be a case where compressed-air to push out the crystal (or just a lift) could give you the room you need?
I'll look at this tomorrow. 👍
 
Posts
4,336
Likes
10,272
Maybe the gap is in a place where you haven't looked or it can't be seen. I've had many that orientation doesn't matter. No notch for the crown.

 
Posts
29,659
Likes
76,810
For watches like this I start with a single sided razor blade, and wiggle it between the bezel and case, then move it all around the bezel. That will open up a small gap that you can fit a slightly thicker blade into, and you work it around the entire case again. Then repeat with a thicker blade - keep going until it poops off. Do not pry...wedge...
 
Posts
2,446
Likes
7,040
Here's a picture of the side of the case. There is minimal gap at the seam. It's like this on the whole perimeter.

 
Posts
1,975
Likes
2,137
Here's a picture of the side of the case. There is minimal gap at the seam. It's like this on the whole perimeter.

Archer uses a razor blade, probably better, I use an exacto knife, but that looks like what I was saying above. I suggest doing it somewhere reasonably hidden (between the lugs) since it is possible to damage the case for an inexperienced person, but should be easy enough.
 
Posts
2,446
Likes
7,040
That will open up a small gap that you can fit a slightly thicker blade into, and you work it around the entire case again
Why would you create a gap on the whole circumference of the case? Why not create a small gap where the opener can be wedged?
 
Posts
29,659
Likes
76,810
Why would you create a gap on the whole circumference of the case? Why not create a small gap where the opener can be wedged?
Because you are trying to lift the whole bezel off evenly, not just one side. You don't want to bend the bezel by lifting one side too much higher than the other. Once it's bent, it will be very difficult to get it right - basically you won't.
 
Posts
2,446
Likes
7,040
Now I'm thinking that perhaps the bezel doesn't need to come off. Looking from the movement side the case screws are abutting a ring-shaped case spacer. Perhaps the spacer can come out from the movement side together with the case and dial. Another possibility is to remove the two case screws, remove the spacer and then remove the movement/dial. The is evidence that a past watchmaker has done this because there is some damage to the case spacer near the crown tube.
 
Posts
4,336
Likes
10,272
As long as it doesn't have to come out the top.
 
Posts
514
Likes
1,951
I’ve had more than a dozen of these early pellaton or cal.89 IWCs and in every case the bezel had to be removed and the two screws securing the movement to the case loosened so that the dial and movement could be taken out through the front.

I’d be surprised if this one were to be different.
 
Posts
2,446
Likes
7,040
I’ve had more than a dozen of these early pellaton or cal.89 IWCs and in every case the bezel had to be removed and the two screws securing the movement to the case loosened so that the dial and movement could be taken out through the front.

I’d be surprised if this one were to be different.
Interesting. So how would you remove the bezel my case?
 
Posts
514
Likes
1,951
Interesting. So how would you remove the bezel my case?
I’d use a very slim razor blade and carefully work it around the entire diameter of the bezel, as Archer suggested.

Some more photos of the other sides of the bezel would also help me form a better opinion. Sometimes the bezel is put back on with the opened lip on a less accessible side than the left flank of the case.
 
Posts
2,446
Likes
7,040
Well, I managed to remove the movement from the case. Turns out I can remove it from the back with the dial by lifting the spacer.
Thanks to all who proposed ideas.

 
Posts
2,446
Likes
7,040
"All right, Mr. DeMille, I'm ready for my close-up.” Not very familiar with IWC but I suspect the dial is original. What do you think?