How often do you go 1000 USD + to buy vintage?

Posts
81
Likes
64
One issue with low-priced watches is that service costs comprise a substantial part of the value. Earlier in my progression as a collector, I focused on lower priced pieces, but I like to have them serviced, and that creates a major problem if you decide to sell or trade them later, since you end up eating the service costs. Or another way to look at is that your annual service/repair costs represent a large fraction of the total value of your collection if you own a lot of low-priced pieces. That's one reason I have gradually convinced myself to add higher-value pieces to my collection. It's easier to justify servicing them and making them correct.
This is so true!
 
Posts
3,172
Likes
7,325
[

You missed the price of the setting lever!! 120 UKP fora service is a great deal, and it is indeed a lovely watch with what I'm assuming is an 18k case....But this is a perfect example of the point I'm trying to make. Is it worth 900 pounds? Yes probably if it's gold ? Would someone go to 1200 UKP (1300+ USD )for a simple uncomplicated watch of this nature with no particular historical or military provenance from a non commercial seller? That's where I'm not so sure...I'm not meaning to dis your sale in any way and I sincerely hope you get what you want for it, but to hobby collectors like me, this is a significant step over my personal comfort zone. The watch owes you 720 or so, I can certainly see a small profit there.. but a 50% markup on your outlay might be a bit ambitious.
Your watch box is very cool btw.
The price for the setting lever was included. I know I get great prices on servicing, but I probably service 10 watches a month (maybe more when I think about it). The watch isn't even gold. These are a steel midcase with rolled gold bezel and lugs. The reason it's priced at a premium (and I admit it is a premium) is because it is in fantastic condition. It's not NOS or mint or "minty" ... it is in exceptional vintage condition with aged lume and almost unmarked dial. There are no dings, just a few minor scratches and swirls. It's the first iteration and the first 342. The serial number suggests 1948 but all the references say this was not sold until 1949. It is a piece that deserves to go into a good collection ... and, it will. When you compare it to (and I use this as an example only) an £1800 TAG that I looked at on Friday, I genuinely think this watch runs rings around it. But, if you want one cheaper, there's a very good 1951 Seamaster Calendar with a hobnail dial sitting next to it in the store for £300 less. It's also a beautiful watch but just 95% as good as the 2851-1. 😀
 
Posts
13,165
Likes
52,300
Started in the nosebleed zone, avoiding the cerebral hemorrhage zone and now in the not buying a damned thing till I sell something zone. My opinion of sub 1000 watches is that there are diamonds out there. I’ve grabbed a few. There are also money pits and watches that just look like s..t frankly. You can spend a lot of cash on cheap watches. They need to be in impeccable condition to justify the service and decent strap.
 
Posts
1,061
Likes
1,939
Started in the nosebleed zone, avoiding the cerebral hemorrhage zone and now in the not buying a damned thing till I sell something zone. My opinion of sub 1000 watches is that there are diamonds out there. I’ve grabbed a few. There are also money pits and watches that just look like s..t frankly. You can spend a lot of cash on cheap watches. They need to be in impeccable condition to justify the service and decent strap.

and how long on average does it usually take to shift a piece in this "not buying a damn thing until I sell something" zone?
 
Posts
13,165
Likes
52,300
and how long on average does it usually take to shift a piece in this "not buying a damn thing until I sell something" zone?
I believe that the squirrel once referred to collectors like me as “black holes”. It may take centuries. 😗

Actually I hope to have some more free time in the next year to actually start managing the collection more.
 
Posts
1,610
Likes
3,827
Actually I hope to have some more free time in the next year to actually start managing the collection more.

Yeah, right. I file this little nugget in the same place as 'tomorrow, I quit'

😁
 
Posts
1,369
Likes
835
gonna watch the vintage seasmaster in the for sale but this was the only one ive bought over $1000 recently, was a vintage tudor from Kyle L. doesnt happen too often
 
Posts
1,061
Likes
1,939
I believe that the squirrel once referred to collectors like me as “black holes”. It may take centuries. 😗

Actually I hope to have some more free time in the next year to actually start managing the collection more.

Ah ,when he isn't trolling or, offering up heartfelt dollops of empathy , the squirrel does indeed know his nuts! 😜
Yup, black hole collectors are the bane of all new hobbyists....They suck in precious watches from all over the galaxy and then distort time and price....Rather like the old couple you meet on holiday and say how nice the resort is:...."
Nah, you should have come here 20 years ago mate.....! "
 
Posts
13,165
Likes
52,300
Yea ... started this journey 5 years ago. I got some good watches and some ok watches. All are in regular rotation. That’s the problem ... nothing sits in the safe. Nothing is asking to be sold.
 
Posts
1,369
Likes
835
Yea ... started this journey 5 years ago. I got some good watches and some ok watches. All are in regular rotation. That’s the problem ... nothing sits in the safe. Nothing is asking to be sold.

but do you baby your vintage watches more than your modern? i mainly worry more about a costly repair due to the vintage status.
 
Posts
13,165
Likes
52,300
but do you baby your vintage watches more than your modern? i mainly worry more about a costly repair due to the vintage status.
Boy do I baby em. They’ve all seen the spa multiple times. Old, complex, sensitive to a raindrop a mile away and fragile.