Hey you 'muricans ... get those Swiss watches pronto

Posts
13,132
Likes
52,160
Well, I can't speak for other countries, but trade statistics between US and Canada are pretty clear. The US buys more goods from Canada than we do from the US. However our population is around 40 million, and the US is 340 million, so is that not expected? You buy and consume far more than we do, just because of your size.

I did see a breakdown on a per capita basis not long ago - US consumers buy something around $1,200/year of Canadian goods. Canadian consumers buy something like $9,000/year of US goods. And somehow we are the bad guys?

Again if you count services, the US has a trade surplus with Canada that is on top of those physical goods...
I certainly don’t support punishing Canada or Mexico, not interested in conquering Greenland. I’m from the rust belt. I get the anger and frustration, but this is as I stated before … a s..t show. You make your own calls re your business. Just remember many of us did not vote for him and are doing what we can. Sadly, many in congress have morphed into invertebrates.
 
Posts
27,902
Likes
71,027
I certainly don’t support punishing Canada or Mexico, not interested in conquering Greenland. I’m from the rust belt. I get the anger and frustration, but this is as I stated before … a s..t show. You make your own calls re your business. Just remember many of us did not vote for him and are doing what we can. Sadly, many in congress have morphed into invertebrates.
I understand. It's going to get worse (much worse) before it gets better.

Stellantis here just announced that they are shutting down their plants in Ontario and in Mexico due to these tariffs. This will of course mean that any plants supporting these in the US will also be affected. What goes around, comes around. No one here takes any joy in it - it's senseless.
 
Posts
12,729
Likes
17,213
it's senseless.
And that's all anyone needs to know.

However, our so-called leaders are clueless.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
21,586
Likes
48,910
So new watches more expensive... Interests will shift more to vintage and a new bubble will start
In principle this makes sense, but I think we might also see people delaying discretionary purchases in general. There are a number of grail watches that have been on my radar screen for years, but I'm not sure if I'd jump on a $20k purchase at the moment.
 
Posts
3,576
Likes
37,491
In principle this makes sense, but I think we might also see people delaying discretionary purchases in general. There are a number of grail watches that have been on my radar screen for years, but I'm not sure if I'd jump on a $20k purchase at the moment
He says... Pull the trigger 😀
 
Posts
30,789
Likes
36,236
Ash -

Since presumably you paid a tariff rate on the watch when you imported it into Australia, the buyer would pay the rate on imports from Australia to their country.

It does not matter where the watch was originally made. For tariff purposes, it is being imported from Australia.
gatorcpa
OK that’s good to know, so Australia will actually be one of the lowest taxed at 10%.

I was just wondering due to the watch worksheets asking for country of origin on each part of the watch, it used to be just the watch overall but I found out shipping a watch a week ago that FedEx’s worksheet had updated to ask for a country of origin breakdown on movement, case, strap and battery so I had thought that might be relevant but good to know its just where we’re actually shipping it from.
 
Posts
5,392
Likes
9,204
Interesting. Deleting ALL of my posts incl. Pictures goes very far. So far, I was not used to that behaviour on the Forum. Many other posts here without actual watch content are still up . This Forum is called Open Discussion. Every of my posts are factual and was for providing Background information for Watch relevant Tariffs, that affect us all.
 
Posts
3,023
Likes
5,823
Interesting. Deleting ALL of my posts incl. Pictures goes very far. So far, I was not used to that behaviour on the Forum. Many other posts here without actual watch content are still up . This Forum is called Open Discussion. Every of my posts are factual and was for providing Background information for Watch relevant Tariffs, that affect us all.

We have a rule against outright political discussion. Many of us have carried on a conversation about this topic without wandering too close to that line, which is presumably why those posts are still up. But, considering that this is a private forum I'd be ok if our moderators decided to remove my posts as well as I understand they... skirt the rules to a degree.

It's my hope we can continue to have constructive conversation about these difficult topics, but I'm sure having to actively moderate posts is part of the reason other forums have outright banned the tariff discussion.
 
Posts
2,179
Likes
2,573
We have a rule against outright political discussion. Many of us have carried on a conversation about this topic without wandering too close to that line, which is presumably why those posts are still up. But, considering that this is a private forum I'd be ok if our moderators decided to remove my posts as well as I understand they... skirt the rules to a degree.

It's my hope we can continue to have constructive conversation about these difficult topics, but I'm sure having to actively moderate posts is part of the reason other forums have outright banned the tariff discussion.
Tariff policies and their impact are certainly relevant to the hobby and we'd like to enable discussion of those. Sprinkling in insults, name calling directed towards (any) politicians is best left for Facebook. Same goes for memes and other slop that's divisive and totally unproductive on a watch forum.
 
Posts
30,789
Likes
36,236
Interesting. Deleting ALL of my posts incl. Pictures goes very far. So far, I was not used to that behaviour on the Forum. Many other posts here without actual watch content are still up . This Forum is called Open Discussion. Every of my posts are factual and was for providing Background information for Watch relevant Tariffs, that affect us all.
We’ve always had a no politics rule, it’s too time consume to moderate, ruins friendships, and bleeds into watch discussions as people end up sniping at eachother there as well.

As Trev said, the tariffs are relevant to us as watch buyers and we’re not going to do the Timezone thing where prices are verboten as that’s silly, but fighting about it here isn’t going to do anything to change policy, and we will remove that.
 
Posts
10,023
Likes
47,972
We’ve always had a no politics rule, it’s too time consume to moderate, ruins friendships, and bleeds into watch discussions as people end up sniping at eachother there as well.

As Trev said, the tariffs are relevant to us as watch buyers and we’re not going to do the Timezone thing where prices are verboten as that’s silly, but fighting about it here isn’t going to do anything to change policy, and we will remove that.
That had gone by the second post. I like the no politics rule.
 
Posts
27,902
Likes
71,027
I completely understand your logic in your point 1. @Archer. It seems to be an excellent example of "tariffs hurt everyone." Regarding point 2, I am saddened and embarrassed how our country is treating our longest and best allies.

Back to watches, I believe that the de minimus exemption on goods valued under $800 still applies to imports from all countries except China. Can anyone else confirm this? I have bought a number of watches for less than $800 internationally and have not had to pay any tariffs. I hope that this will continue.
On the de minimus exemption, it looks like that is going away once the postal service has the resources in place to check and collect duty on all incoming shipments.

https://www.supplychaindive.com/news/de-minimis-china-trump-elimination-tariffs/744313/
 
Posts
4,718
Likes
11,906
On the de minimus exemption, it looks like that is going away once the postal service has the resources in place to check and collect duty on all incoming shipments.

https://www.supplychaindive.com/news/de-minimis-china-trump-elimination-tariffs/744313/

That is unfortunate. This article has some interesting points, especially the quote below
https://www.cato.org/blog/high-costs-eliminating-de-minimis-shipping

Using the agency’s Workload Staffing Model which it reported to Congress in 2023, Oxford Economics estimates that CBP is already nearly 5,000 officers short. It is likewise estimated that eliminating the de minimis exemption entirely would necessitate hiring and training an additional 22,000 CBP officers. The additional paperwork burden would be immense—not to mention the additional wait times for consumers.
 
Posts
3,310
Likes
22,180
Did the USPS get DOGE’d? Enforcement will be a problem if there’s no one enforcing the tariffs.
I believe there are some things in the works to gut the USPS
 
Posts
5,285
Likes
18,343
What's the impact on duty free ports, like airports? I've not paid much attention to them as I live in a state with no sales tax and previously duties were not an issue.
 
Posts
2,456
Likes
2,581
I believe there are some things in the works to gut the USPS
I texted some friends about this who follow this more than me. They said the original de minimus elimination was delayed because CBP/USPS had no way to really enforce it. I can't see them enforcing it now with DOGE happening.