Nice! Can you say any more? Going purely by appearance, this is the most recent Helvetia I have seen - probably produced not that many years before the quartz crisis, I should think.
Love that 1953 ad! I've not seen a Helvetia auto. But IMHO (not v learned though), the 830 manual is a good-looking movement, and maybe that's actually because it is a bit different in fundamental design from all the rest. I don't understand why they made it that way (anyone know?), but I'm glad they did.
According to the serial number and the inscription inside the case back, it is dated 1973.
I can't read it well, but think te calibre is an ETA 2790. The case is 36 mm. wide
Some bad pics:
@CVivash, nice going! What movement does it use, please? Is it Lemania or AS-derived, or Helvetia solo?
Hi, nice Helvetia. You are correct, the date is 1973 and the movement is 2790. If you look at the case ref on the back they start with the movement number at this time.
Thanks. Carl.
I suspected It coud be the number of the calibre, not just pure coincidence, but also tried to read it in the plate.
By the way, I knew where to find the date by your previous post and your web page. Thank you
First, thanks to @CVivash for such a great website, which has really given me some new interest this year. As I've said elsewhere, I keep blowing my Certina/Eterna/etc budget on Omegas, but I finally got round to bringing in something with immense charm at small cost, which I can wear without worry.
Here it is - Helvetia cal 830 from 1955. A little WM TLC and a new strap (it arrived on black - crying out for liberation), and a new life beckons! It's certainly making me very happy.
PS - I'd be very interested in learned opinions about that movement - it appears to have more in the wheel train than you might expect. But why? Beautiful though for a watch that was within the reach of your average 1950s office worker, in a way that Omega, Longines, etc just weren't.
Looks great I have a totally de plated 831 Britannia. Could re-plate. How much did yours cost and who did it and to what thickness?
If that dial showed up on a 1950s VC, folks would be raving over it. Beautiful. 🙄
(PS I too would be interested like @eternalover about your GP specialist.)
I've been looking for a Helvetia since reading up on their movements and history, though I wanted an all-stainless variant.
Tracked this down on ebay.de, lovely 35mm size and with the lesser-spotted 831 movement. I love the subtle sunburst dial, lume aging on the hands (rectangle and triangle for hours and minutes - genius!) and the finish of the movement.......
I've been looking for a Helvetia since reading up on their movements and history, though I wanted an all-stainless variant.
Tracked this down on ebay.de, lovely 35mm size and with the lesser-spotted 831 movement. I love the subtle sunburst dial, lume aging on the hands (rectangle and triangle for hours and minutes - genius!) and the finish of the movement. Can't wait to have this serviced and on the wrist!
![]()
Wouldn't it be great to find an example of this watch in the vintage ad @Helvetia History showed above?
Yes - it is! 😀
Reference 319, manual calibre 64, GP case, probably made 1958.
Why do I like it? 1. This is the sort of watch an ordinary Joe could have aspired to back then, and worn with pride around his office or on a family "occasion", in front of folks who couldn't afford Longines and had never heard of Vacheron. 2. It's really distilled essence of good clean 1950s design. 3. The dial really would do justice to more expensive brands - it's quite beautiful, particularly the well-judged hour markers, which really need video rather than still to show them properly. Nevertheless, here is an attempt:
Not an expensive acquisition, at least by Omega collector standards, and I can see this being in exactly the right zone for "new normal" everyday office wear. 😁