Help with a 1950s Seamaster?

Posts
20
Likes
11
Hi all - I’m brand-new to this forum and pretty new to vintage watch collecting.

I love the look of the mid 50s Seamaster with black dial, silver hands, and no date.
This one is being offered for $900. I’ve verified the serial number on the movement as being from 1956.
I can see some marks on a few indices that could be a bad lume replacement or perhaps evidence of a redial. But it also has a patina, so I figure it’s not a redial.
Any advice?
Is $900 a fair price based on what you can see?
Thanks all!
 
Posts
24,257
Likes
54,020
Something tells me that if I look up a ref 2892 it's not going to be a Seamaster.
 
Posts
20
Likes
11
Something tells me that if I look up a ref 2892 it's not going to be a Seamaster.

Fair point. There seems to be some question about this, but the consensus in this thread seems to be yes, it is a Seamaster.
 
Posts
738
Likes
1,322
Something tells me that if I look up a ref 2892 it's not going to be a Seamaster.
I looked up 2892 and a myriad of seamasters come up so it is a seamaster reference according to Dr Google.
 
Posts
24,257
Likes
54,020
Fair point. There seems to be some question about this, but the consensus in this thread seems to be yes, it is a Seamaster.
I looked up 2892 and a myriad of seamasters come up so it is a seamaster reference according to Dr Google.

Awesome. I guess you're good to go. 👍
 
Posts
59
Likes
185
A Seamaster would have a screw-in case back.
 
Posts
738
Likes
1,322
Google and this forum has this

but omega has this.



I have a seamaster unbranded and omega clearly state it’s a seamaster so I don’t know. Here is my ref from omega.

‍♂️ Google it for yourself. I thought that too.
 
Posts
9,596
Likes
27,705
A Seamaster would have a screw-in case back.

There are loads of Seamaster references with snap-backs. One of the most common Seamaster refs. from the fifties, the 2846, is one of those as is this one - the 2892/2891/2791/2792 come both with or without Seamaster branding.

@Josh2928, based on the patination (greyish inner part of the dial/black outer part) my best guess is that this one is correct. That particular two-tone way of aging is common on this reference.