Help regarding two speedmaster vintage

Posts
301
Likes
594
Dear members,
Good morning.
I need advice regarding these rwo watches:





I have read all the various post on the subject in the forum and I have read the speedmaster101. I don't want to make a mistake ( lesson learned the hard way with a omega seamaster 300). Can you give me your thoughts and opinion regarding these two watches? Right now I like the second one but still debating before pulling the trigger.

I wish you all a great Sunday.

Best regards

Marc antoine
Edited:
 
Posts
5,273
Likes
24,341
You need to post pics here of the watches instead of links, we're not gonna click on two separate links and go back and forth to reply in your thread, help us help you.
 
Posts
301
Likes
594
You need to post pics here of the watches instead of links, we're not gonna click on two separate links and go back and forth to reply in your thread, help us help you.
 
Posts
301
Likes
594
Dear sir,
thank you for the advice. Made the change.
Best regards
Marc antoine
 
Posts
5,273
Likes
24,341
M Mam
Dear sir,
thank you for the advice. Made the change.
Best regards
Marc antoine
There is only 1 pic which is from a bad angle, still need to do some work and make a side by side comparison so to speak.
 
Posts
301
Likes
594
Me again,

I realised that the other picture didn't went through.


105012 66
From the two, I have a tendency to like this one better but still debating.
 
Posts
301
Likes
594
Yes I know the pics are not in the right angle. I have asked the seller to send me these pictures. So far he just sended me pics from the mechanism and the interior of the back case ( numbers are matching with the Omega certificat).
 
Posts
11,999
Likes
20,854
You really need to put a bit more effort in here. The first post suggests there are multiple pictures of the first watch and you posted a single pic of a bad angle.

It will get the discussion going if you post a clear set of pictures for each watch, clearly stating what your thoughts and concerns are, to which members will reply.
 
Posts
301
Likes
594
Dear sir,

I apologise for the bad pictures.
From the two speedmaster I have tendency to like this one. Apparently it is unpolished and from what I see it seems correct. You will find enclosed the pics:
 
Posts
301
Likes
594
Dear sir,

I apologize for the bad pics. You will find the pictures from the watch that so far I like.
 
Posts
301
Likes
594
From what I see. The watch seems correct but in need of a serious cleanning.
 
Posts
301
Likes
594
Dear members,
From these pictures do you think all the parts are original and correspond to a speedmaster 105012 66?
The seller ask for this one 10k euros..Do you think if is tone again thank you for your inputs.

Best regards

Mam
 
Posts
1,921
Likes
2,658
Hi,
refering to the Chrono24 offer:

while looking for a 105.102 myself I had also taken a look at this one


The hour subdial hand seem to have scratched the subdial if you look closely



These two spots have to be checked if the dial is damaged (minute subdial)

 
Posts
301
Likes
594
Sorry. Computer isn't my strongest suit.
I meanned: based on your experience and knowledge do you think this watch is original and if yes do the price asked by the seller is fair or not?
Once again thank you for your inputs
 
Posts
301
Likes
594
Hi,
refering to the Chrono24 offer:

while looking for a 105.102 myself I had also taken a look at this one


The hour subdial hand seem to have scratched the subdial if you look closely



These two spots have to be checked if the dial is damaged (minute subdial)

Waou I haven't noticed it. May I ask if you made an offer and if not why?
 
Posts
5,280
Likes
24,081
Love to help

but I gave up trying to understand what was going on after the fourth post.

I don’t know which watch is which
 
Posts
21,694
Likes
49,185
Very confusing post and crap photos. Clearly the lume on the dial has issues, but I really can't judge the condition. Case looks nice at first glance, bracelet is a nice bonus. But the dial is where the money is.
Edited: