There are a couple of discussions points here
@hc9090.
Firstly, beauty is in the eye of the beholder but the appreciation of a design aesthetic should not preclude a discussion about quality.
As it happens I very much like the 'full-arabic' Omega dials and for some reason these dials were most popular here in the UK, but they are not such a common variant that they are readily available.
However, this is a pressed Omega dial, which was an inexpensive way for Omega to produce these dial types.
Omega did produce applied numeral dials (like the one
@Davidt posted) which are infinitely superior to the pressed type.
(also the dial on the watch you posted has some unattractive spotting which detracts from the look of the dial)
The second point is about value for money.
If you had posted this watch and said, you were short on time and it was £1,000 from a dealer, the response might have been "well that is significantly overpriced but given the circumstances you might consider buying it because you know your brother likes it"
There is always the argument about dealers doing the work for buyers and they have overheads etc. but at £2,000 this watch is obscenely overpriced and no-one here likes to see folks getting ripped off.
My advice would be to talk to your brother about the discussion here about the watch and promise him a watch - because with patience, if you have £2,000 to spend on a watch for him, you could get a really, really nice vintage Omega watch in great condition for that kind of money.
(you should be looking at mint condition Constellations with box and papers with that budget )
- and as a final note, as someone who trained as an architect and have some three-plus decades in the industry, I have trained and worked with some architects who have terrible taste....(but not me or your brother of course 😉)