That link appears to have been taken down. Try this one:
Thanks so much, I had missed the video and I was not aware of the Tag-Heuer reference ("the Artist"). Very funny indeed, but a bit OTT and gaudy perhaps for a brand that produces such elegant watches?
Although they raise good points, H.Moser can be accused easily of being the biggest marketers of all. I mean what is truly visionary about the Swiss Cheese watch, the Swiss Icons, the AW clone? Compare the Swiss Icons to the new Ressence e-crown watch, both launched on the same day...which company really put in the effort to innovate?
On a more general note I think we all hate lazy marketing and boring product development, but marketing is clearly fundamental to sell a completely superfluous and expensive product to a big enough audience, something mainstream luxury companies need to do to survive.
No one "needs" a luxury watch, we all need to be motivated to desire one. Many here on the OF love the NASA association with the Speedmaster, which is completely irrelevant as to how we use the watch on a daily basis, but many love the story, the symbolism, the engineering accomplishment. This message needs to be communicated by Omega and bumped for continued relevance, hence the yearly LE cycle to bring in a new group of collectors.
I think many on the OF agree that brand ambassadors are démodé, but the younger generation feed on twitter/instagram and certain "celebrities" do seem to function as the lifestyle reference for the "herd". There is clearly a wider and more sinister problem here in terms of a general addiction to social media, but if that is effectively the best channel to get your product communicated globally to a new generation, do mainstream luxury watch companies have any choice in not using that channel?
I think in this day and age if you want the "pure watch purchasing experience" with no marketing gloss...you either go for Vintage, or focus on microbrands where you can engage directly with the watchmaker or upcoming brands still small enough that they can "afford" to be "cool" and "anti-establishment" (eg Nomos). Even the Japanese (e.g. Seiko) have found that they need to communicate their pursuit of excellence...the "Japanese master craftsman using his samurai sword polishing skills" is also a marketing message.
Many here on the OF clearly have much more watch knowledge than the majority of sales people we find in ADs and boutiques, and we hate being told what we should buy. We are discerning customers, but we are a tiny minority of potential luxury watch customers.
So although I applaud H.Moser for taking a tongue-in-cheek dig at the "big boys", in our overall critique of marketing and luxury watch product development, are we perhaps being a bit too Don Quixote (WIS nerd) vs the windmills of inevitable 21st century luxury product business practice?
🍿