Good idea

Posts
3,122
Likes
9,308
Thats what we are waiting for! But I tink I will stick to my old 2254.
 
Posts
24,585
Likes
54,593
A picture paints a 1,000 words. The video described it best
Maybe you can ask an AI to summarize the video in a single image. I absolutely can't tolerate these videos for more than about 5 seconds.
 
Posts
1,087
Likes
6,520
I watched it; here’s my take on the video in a nutshell:

The 2254.50 is indisputably a modern classic. Omega should do a remake with updated technology without losing what makes the 2254.50 so awesome. This dude mocked up a proposed new watch, which I admit looks pretty damn good.
If I missed anything, let me know.
 
Posts
49
Likes
68
Thats what we are waiting for! But I tink I will stick to my old 2254.
I had one and stupidly sold it in 2005
 
Posts
49
Likes
68
Maybe you can ask an AI to summarize the video in a single image. I absolutely can't tolerate these videos for more than about 5 seconds.
I respect your opinion. I think he illustrated it well, visually it all works. However, the original bracelet was more plain and a nod to the original Seamster from 60s
 
Posts
10,526
Likes
16,450
The bezel on the supposed original is wrong too. At least it is in the pic 2 posts up.
 
Posts
49
Likes
68
I watched it; here’s my take on the video in a nutshell:

The 2254.50 is indisputably a modern classic. Omega should do a remake with updated technology without losing what makes the 2254.50 so awesome. This dude mocked up a proposed new watch, which I admit looks pretty damn good.
If I missed anything, let me know.
Agreed
The bezel on the supposed original is wrong too. At least it is in the pic 2 posts up.
The original had that beveled edge I quite liked it. It was distinct and different. I wish Omega evolved this one and the bond Seamster, rather than introducing the planet ocean and all the limited editions
 
Posts
3,122
Likes
9,308
The bezel on the supposed original is wrong too. At least it is in the pic 2 posts up.
Thats right, different numbers!
 
Posts
49
Likes
68
Thats right, different numbers!
This should have been the bond Seamster. It looks like the original Seamster 300 or resembles it anyway