GADA watch 4 choices

Posts
1,210
Likes
3,905
All four are nice, but I feel the Speedy is more versatile. While it does have a small seconds hand and no date, you could use the chrono hand as either depending on which you need. And as noted, it's a strap monster, looks good on many variations. And as something to pass down to a pilot son, the Speedy is a gem as well.
 
Posts
1,854
Likes
2,818
If you want a pilot watch, IWC might be worth a look. Some of theirs do have date complications.
 
Posts
24,261
Likes
54,031
This member @Ofan has suddenly started fast posting after being a member for a while, and in every thread he’s demonstrating a remarkable inability to read the room.
 
Posts
7,177
Likes
23,253
Firstly, I've been registered here in the forum for less than two years. Secondly, you can see from the number of posts I've made that I'm not as active here as some others during this period, so it's possible to overlook something like that.
Do I have to apologize for that?

I am interested in Omega watches.
That's why I didn't search the forum for other watch brands.
No big deal. No apology necessary, I saw nothing antagonistic about your post.
 
Posts
16,863
Likes
47,901
I used the same example as Archer used. Both forums have discussions on a variety of brands. Seems to me someone using the username overpricedseiko on TRF is at the least goading the members, at at worst is trolling. If all Standy did was use that username, but was otherwise engaging the discussions in good faith, then he shouldn't have been banned. Folks have been banned from this forum when it becomes clear they're here just to troll. My experience at TRF has always been good. Are there some who are over the top about Rolex...yes. But I have seen plenty of threads praising other brands over Rolex, including many who prefer a Speedmaster over the Daytona.
With both TRF and here being Australian forums and knowing both owners/runners of the both. It was no loss to be banned from TRF.
A tongue in cheek user name was not preferred for the barrister elite owner of TRF in the early days.
Hey I just got banned unlike the plethora of letters on official legal papers that went out in the early years. I read over there and they have mellowed a bit but if you were around in the early days it wasn’t as nice a place.
 
Posts
7,682
Likes
14,208
Of the four offered I'd go for the Rolex, as a long term watch it will probably wear the best.
 
Posts
234
Likes
962
Of the 4 listed, it would between the Aqua Terra 41 and the Air King for me, but the Aqua Terra would win out. Not because I'm a one brand fanboy, but because the numbers on the Air King are too large for me. I had an older Air King that I loved, but traded for some reason that escapes me now. One of my daily wears is an older generation Aqua Terra (not to open a can of worms), but a mid-generations model similar to the bumblebee but with black teak dial and orange highlights that is also 41. I wear it on nato straps. But the new black lacquer dial 41 kinda does something for me... Never really liked the Grand Seiko's, though they are fantastic craftsmanship, and now I don't remember now what the 4th was (doh - the speedmaster) and can't be bothered to click the back button. That 5th option of the blue Zenith Defy someone suggested (again, don't want to click the back button...) is a very very close 2nd and if I tried one on may push the black AT down a notch. Definitely worth considering.
Edited:
 
Posts
1,078
Likes
1,098
I own every generation of Aqua Terra so I'm biased. I much prefer the "teak" dials to lacquer or sunray (first generation). I find it to be a very neat addition to the dial. It adds texture and interest. I also prefer the mixed brushed/polished look so I'm not a fan of the "shades" models that recently came out and the black lacquer version that just came out. Not a fan of the all polished look.

If the polished center links of the AT bother you, they can easily be professionally brushed to satin by any decent watchmaker. It gives the watch a less dressy appearance.

Now as to legibility, the AT is very legible in reasonably good light, but not so good in poor light. This is because the minute hand is only lumed at the tip, rather than the full length. I think this is an unforced error by Omega. If you look at the watch for a few seconds you can discern the minute hand tip from the indices, but at a glance they all kind of blend together. There is no reason whatsoever not to run lume down the length of the minute hand.

I will also say this about the AT--the bracelet leaves much to be desired. Either the total lack of simple micro-adjustment, or, in the case of the new lacquer dial AT, an adjustment system that is tacky, unsightly, and does not provide enough adjustment. But if you plan to use the rubber strap that is top notch.

As for the Rolex, I don't care for that dial at all. And the 32XX movement has had issues. I won't buy a Rolex with that movement because I was burned by buying a Datejust with the 3235 movement and needing to have it serviced (under warranty, thankfully) due to low amplitude. This was less than a year after I bought the watch brand new from an AD. So I sold the watch and will not buy another Rolex with the 32XX movement. Just google search 32XX problems and you will find threads on TRF and WUS debating the issue. Of course the Rolex fan boy mafia comes out in force and says "there's nothing to see here." 🤫

The Grand Seiko is beautiful but the bracelet lacks micro-adjustment. I've owned two Grand Seikos but in the end they did not sit right with me because they felt boring.

The Speedmaster is a sweet watch and would probably be my pick for a one watch collection type watch. Assuming you like the look. And I wouldn't worry about the water resistance as 50m is sufficient to swim with. Although I personally wouldn't swim/snorkel/dive with any watch worth mutiple thousands of dollars.
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,994
You mentioned wearing scrubs which I can assume means you’re in the medical/sciences field. If part of the job is frequent hand washing or scrubbing of viscera, you want a stainless bracelet. Rubber strap sounds appealing as a “water friendly” option but it will trap moisture against the skin if you tend to stay wet or get sweaty and give you a lovely rash.
I would actually not pick one from this list at all and go with a Rolex Explorer (the classic 36mm). No need to sit on a wait list- they are abundant on the used market and basically indestructible. You can scrub them with a brush in the sink after deep diving a rectal exam (whoops, where’s my watch) and either wear them with jacket and tie or t-shirt and jeans. Plus they are one of the most modest of the Rolex designs IMO and don’t draw the attention that many “bling” Rolexes do. If date is a must- then look at the Datejust with plain bezel (these are a great value from the mid 00’s-10’s) or 36mm Oyster Perpetual date.

This from a confirmed Rolex hater and owner of 4- posting on an Omega-centric forum.
Oh and Omega makes some fugly-ass watches!!….nope, still not banned.
 
Posts
1,933
Likes
8,481
For a pilot legacy, Cartier Santos is also very good choice. It will give you plenty of choices in dial and with or without date. It comes with a leather strap and bracelet both, to be a genuine GADA watch with 100m water resistance.
 
Posts
60
Likes
38
This member @Ofan has suddenly started fast posting after being a member for a while, and in every thread he’s demonstrating a remarkable inability to read the room.
Thank you very much for the kind words. If you think that all my posts here in the forum were pointless, then I won't post anything more in the future.
 
Posts
677
Likes
1,780
I got rid of my Air-King 14010 last year after 12 years of ownership and not wearing it very much.
The timekeeping was impeccable, but apart from that it was was Meh !!
It had the worst bracelet and clasp in my collection.
As a GADA at the money the AT is unbeatable in my opinion.I also have a Longines Conquest VHP which is almost an AT on a budget.
 
Posts
638
Likes
1,506
Good first impression the argument in this thread is giving OP, come on guys. 😜

To answer OP's question, IMO of the choices given, the Aqua Terra is the best. Speaking specifically to the Air King, I consider it an uglier Rolex Explorer, apologies to any modern Air King owners. If you like the general shape and vibe of the Air King, strongly suggest trying on an Explorer, for a 7.5 inch wrist either the 36 or 40 will work nicely, will just be personal preference. The Explorer is, to me, the definitive GADA watch by which all other GADA watches are measured.

Aqua Terra 41mm black lacquer or teak face.
. Would likely wear on rubber strap. Lots of good qualities but not sure about the legibility of the lume and the teak deck face doesn’t appeal very much to me. Also, this watch is quite blingy. I would prefer a more understated watch.

Aqua Terra but more legible, without the teak deck face, and more understated? My friend, you just described a second generation Railmaster.

I know you said 41 mm, but I think that's too big. Look at the 39 mm 2503.52, not hard to pick up on the second hand market in 39. I wear a much rarer 36, which I think would still suit you but if you're looking at 41's, you're probably not interested in a 36... lucky you. 😉

Edited:
 
Posts
147
Likes
158
Hi omega friends,
This is my first post on the forum and I certainly have learned a lot from visiting the site.
I would like your opinions regarding choosing a one and only.
Some background: This would be my first luxury watch and I would wear it as a daily. I’m am almost 60 and generally wear casual clothing and scrubs at work. My wrist size is 7.5 inches.
Ideally, would like a watch with a date, display case back, and at least 100m WR. Some of the candidates are lacking in these criteria.

Watches I’m considering:
1. Rolex Air King
I’m on and eternal wait list (9 months) for this. My son is a commercial pilot so would be a good watch to pass down, I like the bracelet and interesting face.
2. Grand Seiko Lake Suwa 021
Love the accuracy of the movement and quality of the watch face. Lume would be nice and not sure about the no micro adjustment bracelet .
3. Aqua Terra 41mm black lacquer or teak face.
. Would likely wear on rubber strap. Lots of good qualities but not sure about the legibility of the lume and the teak deck face doesn’t appeal very much to me. Also, this watch is quite blingy. I would prefer a more understated watch.
4. Speedmaster 3861 sapphire
Doesn’t meet many of the criteria but this watch is special. Love the tool nature of this but not sure about water resistance, manual wind and lack of large seconds hand.

So which one!
Your opinions and thoughts are appreciated in advance.

Air King has too many numbers for my liking. AT would be best imo
 
Posts
6,598
Likes
26,722
Choose the watch you enjoy the most and forget about all the opinions you’ll read in this thread. You’re the one that has to live with it 👍

Having said that, in my most humble opinion, that Air King is one ugly watch. That’s coming from a place of me absolutely loving the original reference and its sleek variations. Where the Rolex design team pulled that bloated mess is beyond me. For a visual example, here is an original next to the updated version…


And one on my 7” wrist.
 
Posts
216
Likes
217
Choose the watch you enjoy the most and forget about all the opinions you’ll read in this thread. You’re the one that has to live with it 👍

Having said that, in my most humble opinion, that Air King is one ugly watch. That’s coming from a place of me absolutely loving the original reference and its sleek variations. Where the Rolex design team pulled that bloated mess is beyond me. For a visual example, here is an original next to the updated version…


And one on my 7” wrist.
That original version seems very similar to an OP.
 
Posts
216
Likes
217
Much like the Oyster Perpetual Date is similar to the Datejust.
Not that anyone would ever say that Rolex only really makes one watch 😗

I guess there's enough difference between GMTs and Subs and Daytona's to make that a silly statement.