Harriet
·Hello everyone, this is my first post on the forum. I am hoping to dive into the rabbit hole of vintage Omegas, in particular the first generation Flightmasters.
I'm in the very fortunate position of being able to purchase for myself a watch that I would use as my daily, with restrictions, and appropriate respect, of course! No water, no gym time, would hate to chip a crystal on the weights rack!
Do you think a Flightmaster would be robust enough, bearing in mind they are now 50 odd years old? I have been wearing Seiko divers for years, and Speedtimers too which have served me very well but there is just something amazing about the Flightmaster.
A sub question for you too, please if I may...on the MK1 's, what were the clasp variants, if indeed there were variants?
Are the later versions with the running seconds considered more desirable? Is the movement better (stronger/more reliable)?
My search is beginning, and it has brought me here. Thanks in advance to anyone who might like to comment.
I'm in the very fortunate position of being able to purchase for myself a watch that I would use as my daily, with restrictions, and appropriate respect, of course! No water, no gym time, would hate to chip a crystal on the weights rack!
Do you think a Flightmaster would be robust enough, bearing in mind they are now 50 odd years old? I have been wearing Seiko divers for years, and Speedtimers too which have served me very well but there is just something amazing about the Flightmaster.
A sub question for you too, please if I may...on the MK1 's, what were the clasp variants, if indeed there were variants?
Are the later versions with the running seconds considered more desirable? Is the movement better (stronger/more reliable)?
My search is beginning, and it has brought me here. Thanks in advance to anyone who might like to comment.










