First Post - views on this ebay listing

Posts
11
Likes
0
Hello everyone

First time poster here.

Around 6 months or more ago I developed a sudden pang for vintage Omegas, specifically 60s Seamaster/SMDVs. I'm not otherwise a watch guy and have no real desire to become a collector. My taste in nearly all things derives from an appreciation of simple aesthetics and an appreciation of historic craftsmanship (I generally like antiques etc). In particular I've read some odes to the 5xx series on this forum and others which I've found inspiring. The more I read the more I want!

This forum in particular is an amazing repository of knowledge and information. At the same time, as a prospective first (and hopefully one-time) time buyer I can find, not the specific advice and information, but the principles and approach to watch buying confusing. In short, my searches for a watch don't tally with what the experienced posters on this forum teach newbies to expect. Specifically, I struggle to find issue-free/respectable watches at the price and quality often suggested is available by posters here.

To test this theory - and my inexperience - I thought to post an eBay link, provide my commentary and look for your views.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/174354767226

Here is ostensibly a 1962 SMDV cal 562 ref presumably a 166.020 for £525. To breakdown my views:

- Listing description is relatively detailed. No mention of refurb, redial or polishing. States "original" condition. Relatively honest about lack of information on the piece ("think original crown" etc) and on condition/functionality. Pictures include face, crown, movement, inside caseback, but no clear case back image. Clear indication would need a service if bought.

- Price - for UK eBay listings this is at the cheap end of what I can find currently online, Inc chrono24

- Dial - is suspiciously "clean" and unblemished to me. Otherwise no obvious issues pointing to a redial I can see eg mismatch in marking colour, wrong font, misalignment of markings, wrong hands etc.

- Movement. Looks fine to my very untrained eye. Would have it serviced.

- Inside caseback. The serial number (?) looks odd but I don't know exactly why.

- Case. Looks too clean to me, possibly has been polished.

- Crystal. Large scratch over the date window. Images not hi res enough to see if it's signed in the middle. Would look at replacing pending higher res images on request/inspection on receipt. Not knowledgeable enough to know how much that would cost.

- Strap. Don't care and would replace anyway.

- Caseback. Generally fine but comments on case apply plus no clear image provided.

- Crown. Plausibly original and checks out when x-reffed to original models.

Verdict. I'd not buy it due to reservations about the dial.

However, looking at more common listing at the £800-1000 mark I often do not feel any more confident in the condition and originality.

Really welcome your views and any learning points to take forward.

KP

Edited:
 
This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.
Posts
4,939
Likes
18,332
Good first post. But one thing, please post pictures, not just the link. Link dissapears after time. Thank you!
 
Posts
5,349
Likes
9,116
100% agree on caseback #s -- very suspicious.

Since it's a '62, the lump should likely be radium. The white toothpaste on the markers and hands looks like anything but 75+ year-old radium.

Case is not great (polish), movement looks dirty, etc.

Easy 'pass' for me.
 
Posts
11
Likes
0
Good first post. But one thing, please post pictures, not just the link. Link dissapears after time. Thank you!

Thanks. Now edited - was originally posted from phone so got the laptop out.
 
Posts
2,218
Likes
4,942
Hello everyone



- Dial - is suspiciously "clean" and unblemished to me. Otherwise no obvious issues pointing to a redial I can see eg mismatch in marking colour, wrong font, misalignment of markings, wrong hands etc.
If you compare the "Automatic" writing to other Omegas of this era, you will probably change your mind about the "redial" aspect. It looks like a manual wind dial where someone has added the word "automatic". Very odd.

The movement looks quite clean and this is not unusual with these front loaders. I seem to get a fair few of these in to work on and most of the movements are in good condition.

A lot of these dials are very clean so, that's not the best way to check redials. Good luck in your hunt!

Cheers, Chris
 
Posts
11
Likes
0
If you compare the "Automatic" writing to other Omegas of this era, you will probably change your mind about the "redial" aspect. It looks like a manual wind dial where someone has added the word "automatic". Very odd.

The movement looks quite clean and this is not unusual with these front loaders. I seem to get a fair few of these in to work on and most of the movements are in good condition.

A lot of these dials are very clean so, that's not the best way to check redials. Good luck in your hunt!

Cheers, Chris

Thanks Chris and actually yes, once I saw the pictures up on laptop rather than phone I had suspicions about the AUTOMATIC text as well. Also note your point regarding redials generally. Very helpful.
 
Posts
11
Likes
0
100% agree on caseback #s -- very suspicious.

Since it's a '62, the lump should likely be radium. The white toothpaste on the markers and hands looks like anything but 75+ year-old radium.

Case is not great (polish), movement looks dirty, etc.

Easy 'pass' for me.

Thanks BlackTalon. Any comments on learning points, including on price points and best way forward to learn more or source a good example of what I'm told is quite a common model? One thing I have seen mentioned is comparing online finds with reference images of collectors' watches, so tick off point by point against a near-as-possible 'verified' original. Always keen to learn!
 
Posts
2,218
Likes
4,942
Have a look at this thread:

https://omegaforums.net/threads/learn-how-to-fish.52603/

Then, browse the Private watch sales forum and see what's there. There are often better deals there than eBay. Still, you need to exercise judgement and don't forget that if you're in UK, you need to add 22% or so for import duty if the seller is outside of the EU.

Don't rush as the hunt is the best part!

Cheers, Chris
 
Posts
215
Likes
188
I was looking at this one earlier today.

The thing that struck me as weird, as you mentioned, were the numbers inside the caseback.
 
Posts
321
Likes
968
- Inside caseback. The serial number (?) looks odd but I don't know exactly why.

In my experience, case reference numbers by this manufacturer are quite often wobbly and look as if they have been engraved by hand. I have two 14770 SC front loaders who look similar (sorry, can't provide photos right now) and here is a pic from this old thread:
https://omegaforums.net/threads/omega-deville-ref-14910-sc-62-all-good.31400/



The "Automatic" font would put me off too, btw.
 
Posts
9,591
Likes
27,597
Surely the hands are incorrect? 😕

Shouldn't Seamaster DeVilles have stick hands?
 
Posts
11
Likes
0
Surely the hands are incorrect? 😕

Shouldn't Seamaster DeVilles have stick hands?

Yes they absolutely are.