Thank you for sharing. There have been many of those popping up for sale on line recently.
B BdavisHello everyone, new to the forum. I posted a reply to the other thread re early seamaster divers and what to look for, but j didn’t get any feedback. I figured I’d give this thread a shot. I have one for y’all. From what I’ve can see it all looks right, dial print is not quite white but also not grey… case bezel, dial and hands look right to me… thoughts?
To me this looks correct.
Feels like an honest, well-used, example.
But these really are a jungle.
I quite like the model, but with so many iffy examples around, I've just tried to stay clear over the years.
REPORT Please !
https://www.ebay.it/itm/Omega-Seamaster-120/264650553863
https://www.ebay.de/itm/Omega-Seamaster-120-Black-Dial-cal-601-anno-1967/274263452327
https://www.ebay.it/itm/Omega-Seamaster-120-Automatic-NOS/264649351303
https://www.ebay.de/itm/Omega-Seama...ilitary-Cal-565-1967-Ref-166-027/312991592290
Dial, hand and bezel ok
Glas with magnifier ok
Polished case
Service caseback
Later 1125/560 bracelet
Not a bad one
K KruftI’m confused I’ve always stayed away from ones with ‘pointed A’s on the case back? Yet now people are saying they are ‘service casebacks’ what is the correct case back? Does any of the ‘experts’ know #misinformation
K KruftI used this guide and dismissed many despite having contradictory info given here.
I have finally relented the plung and paid good money for what I believe (and hope is a good one) advice from ‘ the watch bloke Duncan Hewitt’ ‘wait and buy a good one it’ll save a fortune in serving and parts’’
K KruftI’m confused I’ve always stayed away from ones with ‘pointed A’s on the case back? Yet now people are saying they are ‘service casebacks’ what is the correct case back? Does any of the ‘experts’ know #misinformation
