Early bumper auto chronometer 14311 Constellation questions.

Posts
3
Likes
4
Hello all! New member and fairly new to watches. First off, I reviewed the vintage omega posting guide and appreciate the help! I own this watch via a family member and am not invested in its monetary value but have a few questions about its specifics- this seemed like a good place to start.

As i'm not a serious collector and the watch has sentimental value, I'm hoping to learn a bit and not get lit up too much on the condition 馃槈



I was left this watch nearly a decade ago by my Grandfather. I've been told that it was a wedding gift in 1955, and the otherwise plain exterior of the caseback has his initials and the date. I wore it a few times and put it away in a drawer until recently, when I had it serviced to get it cleaned up and running reasonably accurately.



The watchmaker informed me that it was an early bumper automatic, had been redialed, had a replacement crystal, and had gotten pretty wet at some point, so the chronometer rating was no longer within the realm of expectation. Some googling also indicated that the movement probably dates from a few years before 1955. I snagged the caseback and movement photos while it was on the bench.



My questions- When was the actual date of manufacture? What do the model numbers and serial indicate about its features? Are the engraved lines on the front of the case original? I tried to show the lugs and as many details as possible but realize that the caliber number is probably hidden behind the rotor.

I'm aware that the redial has some issues, but how would it rate and what are my options (if any) as far as getting this thing back to a more original state?

If anyone has any photos of what the original dial would've looked like, that would be fantastic, and thanks all for any info. A ballpark on the value wouldn't hurt either, as it may influence what I do or don't put in to restoration.
 
Posts
16,762
Likes
35,142
................. Are the engraved lines on the front of the case original? .

The engraved lines are on the part called a bezel, and they are original. It's known as "Florentine" finish.
 
Posts
1,512
Likes
2,589
The movement was made around 1951-2 but as you say that dial been repainted at some point. It bears no relation to a 1950s Connie.

This thread might offer some info:

https://omegaforums.net/threads/omega-14311-a-chronometre-review.4566/

I don't know about 'bears no relation.' Technically, this is part of the line of post-centenary automatic chronometers that eventually culminated in the Constellation. But it would be true that the watch was not born as a Constellation.
 
Posts
313
Likes
254
I think you are dead right to see if you can find a donor watch with a (much) better dial. Hopefully one of the experts here will help you out with the right reference to look for.

With a decent dial, it would be a nice watch and match a nice appearance to the sentimental value.

Good luck with it.
 
Posts
13,441
Likes
31,613
These were available with a variety of dials.

This is my original example.

 
Posts
13,441
Likes
31,613
The engraved lines are on the part called a bezel, and they are original. It's known as "Florentine" finish.
Curious, could you point to another example of this reference with a Florentine bezel, I've never seen one?
 
Posts
5,636
Likes
5,793
As for meeting chronometer specifications, all you need is a watchmaker willing to do the work and the money to pay for it. Because of sentimental value, that might be possible. For a random watch, it likely wouldn't be worth the money.
 
Posts
21,735
Likes
49,326
Curious, could you point to another example of this reference with a Florentine bezel, I've never seen one?

I haven't either, but it's very eye-catching, and I hope it's original.
 
Posts
16,762
Likes
35,142
Curious, could you point to another example of this reference with a Florentine bezel, I've never seen one?
I've never seen one either.
I could see that it was a Florentine bezel and assumed that it was original as I wouldn't have expected the original owner to have had the bezel re-finished. But then again, the dial has been done, so who knows.
We never will.
 
Posts
3
Likes
4
These were available with a variety of dials.

This is my original example.

Thanks for the photo! That's a beautiful watch and I think that's the closest I've seen to a watch resembling what I have. I appreciate everyone's input. I've also never seen another one with a florentine bezel- the line work extends on to the lugs a little bit as well.

I'm pretty sure my grandfather wore this almost daily in his later years as I don't recall seeing him without it.

There's something enjoyable about the bumper movements, I find myself moving it around to feel it working. I'd love to find a basic stainless steel example with a similar caliber, maybe a military watch from the era, that would be better suited to more regular wear.

If anyone has any more info, feel free to chime in. If nothing else, Im grateful for this piece as an introduction to the world of mechanical watches.
 
Posts
3
Likes
4
I鈥檝e worn this a few times since posting and have run into an issue- the bezel and crystal have popped off. I鈥檓 unsure of the cause as it wasn鈥檛 due to impact, and it happened once while the watch was stored in a drawer near a cold window.

Anyone have a suggestion? Are these crystals just press-fit or are they glued?
 
Posts
5,636
Likes
5,793
Armored with a retaining ring, no glue. That bezel might not have been properly seated the last time it was off.

A very good watchmaker will make it right.