Do you need a beater if you have a Speedmaster?

Posts
531
Likes
1,183
I do have beaters- seiko, Casio, - for the everyday use
 
Posts
1,396
Likes
2,706
I have a Citizen Quartz watch which I use as my beater, I also have 3 quality, expensive watches which whilst I am sure that they can be worn daily and can take some abuse, i don't wear them daily. I prefer to keep them and wear them when I am not doing jobs but to wear when I am relaxing or at weekends or when out with friends or when I am on holiday. Having spent a sizeable sum of money on each watch I see no reason to bash them up unnecessarily.
 
Posts
99
Likes
296
I have a seiko monster as my beater. If you’re doing stuff in the water I’d recommend one! Wear it fishing, or on the boat
 
Posts
239
Likes
194
It's the reason why I own some of my Hamilton/Seiko watches. It doesn't cost as much as my other watches and it doesn't stress me out if it gets banged up, lost or stolen, etc..
 
Posts
15,222
Likes
44,699
What do you guys think?

If this is how you wish to wear your Speedmaster, please, oh please get back to us with pictures of what is left of the watch after a few years of wear!

My 30 year old Speedmaster commemorating the 20th anniversary of Apollo XI.

 
Posts
94
Likes
122
Wear it! Beat it up! It’s a tool watch afterall. One shortcoming of my Speedy is the low water resistance. Otherwise like commented above, it’s a daily. My beach beater is a seamaster.

Couldn't have said it better.
 
Posts
67
Likes
35
If I'm doing something physical, running etc., I'll wear a watch. Depending on the activity (say Nerf war with the kid), I'll opt for the cheapest thing I own. I don't need to dampen a fun afternoon if I tumble into something with the Speedy. Also, I'm not going to grab lumber at Home Depot with an Omega. Garage work, or swapping gears on a motorcycle, I don't wear a watch at all. Safety reasons.

Running casual errands, daily work wear, etc., it's fair game for the decent watches to come out.
 
Posts
1,790
Likes
2,001
You don’t need a beater unless you spend time in the sea. A well maintained speedy is an excellent beater and look good on your wrist even with some battle scares. I actually have an idea to get my 3’rd Speedy just to use as beater😁
So... you feel the need for a beater?😎
 
Posts
221
Likes
208
Enjoy the watch man. As a former bodybuilder and now power lifter, I don’t know how you can wear a watch in the gym. It doesn’t dig into your wrists when benching or squatting?

My gym watches used to dig into my wrist until I swapped to a NATO. I hardly notice them now. Great for deadlifts, squat, bench, etc. but haven’t tried all of the Olympic lifts with them... Maybe not ideal for a hang clean or snatch.

You guys are pushing me to bring my Speedy to the gym...!
 
Posts
16,854
Likes
47,854
What do you guys think?

If this is how you wish to wear your Speedmaster, please, oh please get back to us with pictures of what is left of the watch after a few years of wear!


OK
5 years of daily use



Spend a bit of time climbing over these wearing a Speedmaster
 
Posts
2
Likes
5
In my opinion the question is: do I need to wear a Speedmaster while i lift weights or play football? It may be resistant and not break, but it still get scratches (especially the hesalite) and it's uncomfortable.
I wear the Speedmaster at the office and the Seamaster on weekends, but when I lift or I'm at home I prefer the Apple Watch for its light weight and soft feel on the wrist.
 
Posts
1,071
Likes
2,165
If my beater is going to look like a beater, then I don't want it to be my Speedmaster. I rarely wear a watch outside of work, so the worst abuse any of mine get is from driving my desk.
 
Posts
3,568
Likes
24,083
One's finances are major variable here. I have a young family and need to able to extract value from my watches if need be. So, why risk a nice watch with $1K+ resale value when I can just wear a $200 watch to the beach or in the garage?
 
Posts
39
Likes
27
I know this is an eye-raising question for a number of reasons, but I’d like to push the envelope here. While the Speedmaster is considered a luxury watch nowadays, I want to assess it based on its origin as a durable tool watch.

I typically switch to a Swiss Army when I do something active (weight lifting, running, yard work, etc.), and for a while was considering an Explorer as a beater. Now, I’m wondering if it would be superfluous to my Speedmaster, since it matches NASA’s specs requiring:
  1. Shock - Six shocks of 40g each, in six different directions, with each shock lasting 11 milliseconds.
  2. Acceleration - The test item shall be accelerated linearly from 1g to 7.25g within 333 seconds, along an axis parallel to the longitudinal spacecraft axis.
  3. Decompression - 90 minutes in a vacuum of 1.47 x 10E-5 psi (10 E-6 atm) at a temperature of 160° F (71° C), and 30 minutes at a 200° F (93°C).
  4. High Pressure - The test item shall be subjected to a pressure of 23.5 psi (1.6 atm) for a minimum period of one hour.
  5. Vibration - Three cycles of 30 minutes (lateral, horizontal, vertical, the frequency varying from 5 to 2000 cps and back to 5 cps in 15 minutes. Average acceleration per impulse must be at least 8.8g.
  6. Acoustic Noise - 130dB over a frequency range from 40 to 10,000 HZ, for a duration of 30 minutes.
If my Speedy can withstand the above (albeit with some impact to timekeeping), so what if I knock it against a few weights from time to time? Obviously, an Explorer would be preferable - Rolex claims their watches “have to pass more than 20 different drop tests before their launch...exclusive shock-testing equipment submits the watch to an impact equivalent to 5,000 G - hundreds of times more than a car crash test. Yet the watch has to remain unharmed and fully functional afterwards...” but I wonder if it’s really necessary if you own a Speedy.

Plus, there are fun anecdotes on these forums, like a Speedmaster that was run over by a car and still worked. Of course, on the other end of the spectrum, I read a story of someone who knocked their pusher off on the door frame of an RV...

What do you guys think?
Wear mine morning to dusk ,only taken off if doing panel beating ect, done more damage to watches over the years taking em off (dropping ect) and putting em in a "safe place"........just saying
 
Posts
1
Likes
1
Necessary no but the explorer is definitely practical, I’m personally fine with my speedy as a beater
 
Posts
261
Likes
201
My gym watches used to dig into my wrist until I swapped to a NATO. I hardly notice them now. Great for deadlifts, squat, bench, etc. but haven’t tried all of the Olympic lifts with them... Maybe not ideal for a hang clean or snatch.

You guys are pushing me to bring my Speedy to the gym...!
My last deadlift (this morning at 5am) was 585 pounds. A nato would have shot that watch across the room from the pressure. Plus I need wrist wraps with the pounds I usually press and pull. No watches in the gym for me. I keep my seamasters and submariners locked in my glovebox lol
 
Posts
242
Likes
2,453
So... you feel the need for a beater?😎
Yes😀 Since my present Speedys are an Ed White and a 145.012 I’m a little careful with them😉
 
Posts
4,758
Likes
12,039
I'm not going to leave my Speedy tucked in my shoe on the sidelines while I play pick up soccer (football) at the park. So yes.
 
Posts
2,675
Likes
7,487
I enjoy biking in different terrains. Sometimes a paved 60 km journey by highway to a nearby city, other times an off-road trail that snakes around trees through the dirt.

My road bike and mountain bike are both “capable” of either trip, but I strongly prefer the right one for each.

When I’m at my desk, in meetings or at dinner, a Speedy does the trick. When I’m digging in my yard or repairing landscape, I prefer my Seiko 5.

Speedy for sushi:


Seiko for sweating:
Edited: