sgrossma
·Not sure where I stand on this one but here's my experience. For my 21st birthday my parents wanted to buy me a watch and gave me the choice with a price limit of £65, quite a bit of money in the dark ages! I whittled it down to a choice between a Speedmaster and a Rolex Submariner at that time both were about the same price, on that basis if you consider the Sub a luxury watch then the Speedy should be too. I choose the Speedmaster because at that time I went to a lot of motor race meetings and wanted to use it for timing. It is a 105.003-65 which then meant nothing to me. I used it as my everyday watch for forty years including going dingy sailing which inevitably led to the occasional soaking, so it was certainly treated as a tool watch.
For my 60th birthday my wife bought me a gold Seamaster Aqua Terra which I would definitely class as a luxury watch and it is treated as such, although ironically at today's values it is not worth anything like as much as the Speedmaster.
What does this prove? No idea!
Interesting, but I think the two watches were a bit more comparable 40 years ago. Today the standard Submariner has seen many upgrades, while the Speedmaster had not. Sub-C is my daily more or less. It is so much more substantial than the classic 14060, which always felt a bit flimsy and cheap to me. I know they have updated versions of the Speedmaster available, but the classic still costs a fortune.
