padders
··Oooo subtitles!For sure. Just making the point that it can be said that Omega’s tritium recreation is one thing, the radium another.
... 'on the first tritium dials, the markers were ivory colored with a greenish tinge or pale yellow from the 1970s to the 1990s, according to production period' could be left open to interpretation if people ignore the bold bit...it is clear there are no green lume dials in the 60s, early 70s or late 80s or 90s. If you want to take the MWO statement as gospel though, there are still a few holes...like the 60s...and the color of early radium dials (shown in Walter Schirra's pics..and also it is clear that the 90s were not ivory colored, but rather what people today would call 'faux'. And, worth mentioning, this is just speedmasters. I am fairly certain the same dialmakers used the same lume on other manufacturers dials...
but I'm not that motivated by the topic...
So, please stop calling everything with any color 'faux patina' or 'fauxtina' or 'faux', or whatever, please stop complaining, please look at historically accurate (to details as fine as lume color) modern watches that DONT have white lume in a positive way, and please please pretty please when you are GTG'ing with your watch buddies, educate them. And if you know any of the said YouTube-watch-pro-wannabees, definitely educate them. Thanks.
Get your point that Lume was never solid white, and I am not even complaining about Faux lume?
But I can see why it’s called Faux lume by so many.
It’s just what do they call lume that is made to look vintage.
It’s evident on the watch below the lume is tinted to look vintage
There are two possible ways to "translate" the sentence:
1. ...on the Speedmaster tritium dials, the markers were ivory colored with a greenish tinge or pale yellow, depending on the specific production period within the 1970s to the 1990s.
2. ...on the first Speedmaster tritium dials, the markers were ivory colored with a greenish tinge and subsequently pale yellow from the 1970s onwards.
I tend to lean towards the second one because why ignore the "first Speedmaster Tritium dials" which as we know, were introduced around ~1963 (the 105.002-62 went from radium to tritium, depending on the production year).
I guess the best thing would be to contact them directly but I'm not that motivated by the topic... 😜
Your frequency/duplicity-in-multiple-threads of replies indicates otherwise 🙄
What I find more and more crazy as time goes by is how every lemming on the internet throws 'faux tina' in when they diss a watch (like this).
Erm...nope 😀 This is what I mean...
Here are 145.012s (the one on the right spent 50 years locked up in a safe, the other not) that IMHO have 0 patination (and the tritium glows very strongly).
You can’t say something 50 years old has 0 patination if you can’t compare it to a brand new one.
And how do you know for certain that the above or any watch you are looking at has not been relumed 5-10 maybe 30 years ago
Here are some ads showing yellow lume across almost all of the watches here.
I would point out though, that the Chronostop Seamaster has distinctly green lume, so 70s Speedmasters like those in the image below (thread linked) have NOS condition lume, not lume that has patinated green.
https://omegaforums.net/threads/first-speedmaster-thoughts-on-lume.32610/
I would point out though, that the Chronostop Seamaster has distinctly green lume, so 70s Speedmasters like those in the image below (thread linked) have NOS condition lume, not lume that has patinated green.
https://omegaforums.net/threads/first-speedmaster-thoughts-on-lume.32610/
...as there's a good chance I'll be running into Mr. Protopapas in the near future, what I will do is ask him for his opinion and/or recollection, specific to the Speedmasters...
So ...asked and answered. In his professional opinion, new tritium paint was white.
Cheers