Dato-Compax Dial Check

Posts
82
Likes
203
I've seen so few of these I can't examine with any confidence...

http://www.ebay.com/itm/universal-g...-men-s-watch-1944-vintage-steel-/262926454016

s-l500.jpg

Does this look like an original dial to you? The sharp sub-dial 3s are correct, yes? Any comments appreciated.
 
This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.
Posts
159
Likes
195
It looks like a redial to me, I see 3 different kind of 7 and the second and minute subdials do not look right to me.
 
Posts
713
Likes
2,050
Appears to be a redial with some of the correct cliches. The different 7's are ok, but the execution is not. Uneven inking overall and the tachy and seconds scales look incorrect
 
Posts
713
Likes
2,050
Hmmm I'm actually waffling on this one. Could be original dial. need sleep. I'll take another look later
 
Posts
1,930
Likes
22,745
Saw that watch when it first came out in the 'bay, dial looks ok to me but the marker dots bothers me quite a bit. The colour looks a bit odd, and I can't get a good close-up photos from the seller for that. The replaced crown to a non-period UG crown made me think of the possible restoration works that has been done to the watch, so I pass.
 
Posts
1,378
Likes
2,916
I've seen so few of these I can't examine with any confidence...

http://www.ebay.com/itm/universal-g...-men-s-watch-1944-vintage-steel-/262926454016

s-l500.jpg

Does this look like an original dial to you? The sharp sub-dial 3s are correct, yes? Any comments appreciated.

I have seen images at sellers website and It is an interesting dato. It is also a very early one. UG dials of that time commonly had minor flaws. This one is consistent with that. Nothing about the dial worries me and it is within gn acceptable in terms of quality and era. I would have expected it with lumed dagger hands and it may have originally been like that but nothing stands out and I don't agree with the redial hypothesis. I think it is kosher ...

I am still rummaging through archives and have some doubts on the second one that Lous shows.
 
This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.
Posts
255
Likes
314
the OP one is original dial, no doubt for me. As Diabolik said it is very early Dato Compax. IMHO also the hands are correct.
Crown later replacement for sure, as it shouldn't be logoed. It is an extremely rare watch, only reason it is priced so low and still did not sell is a) the diameter is very very small (32/33mm is I remember correct) and b) the conditions are OK but not spectacular