mayankyadav
·but all I'm saying is in terms of problems facing us from fake goods/products watches are not a top priority, you of course are free to disagree.
But we are on a watch forum!
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
but all I'm saying is in terms of problems facing us from fake goods/products watches are not a top priority, you of course are free to disagree.
You seem to have a habit of getting your panties in a bunch when someone takes a different view to your own, but all I'm saying is in terms of problems facing us from fake goods/products watches are not a top priority, you of course are free to disagree.
I'll be the first to admit that I do not suffer fools gladly and that's why I react to your post.
Not reacting to fake watches because there are worse crimes is so blatantly stupid that it needs to be called out. The industry of faked luxury goods runs to more than $200 billion a year and indirectly funds organised crime, including human trafficking as well as some aspects of terrorist activity. Then there's the issues of tax dodging, ethic labour issues and general damage done to brand perception of the faked item - have a look at what measures the brands take to fight this issue and see how much money is spent on it.
I guess you do not work in an industry where this is a problem, right? You failed to answer that...
Not having the mental faculties to care about fake watches because more directly critical items are being faked too is a worry - perhaps you should spend less time discussing issues where you are so much in the wrong that it is an embarrassment and more time resting and preparing yourself for more mundane tasks would be a good idea.
Third, I was not asked a question about the industry I work in, so perhaps it's that your panties are indeed too tight that it's effecting your own mental faculties.
You also specifically said that no-one should have a problem with people buying fakes - using the frankly ridiculous argument that items such as medicine were being faked as well. So we shouldn't worry about one type of crime because worse exists? Even though they have been found to be closely intertwined and share a number of characteristics?
Do just a bit of research on the impact of counterfeiting if you have the capacity to do so.
Just to help you out.
pIoNeErOfThEnILe said: ↑
that's just not true. peeps buy reps for all kinds of reasons. i have no problem with anyone buying one and nobody else should either.
Oh for... What a fine mess I've gotten myself into 🤦
Sorry about the confusion, should have realised there were two of you...
So, @Stufflers Mom - what do you work with? And are you okay with people wearing counterfeit items?
@pIoNeErOfThEnILe - could you elaborate on your point made earlier?
At the end of the day the point I'm making is yes the production and sale of fake goods is to be discouraged, but from a priority point of view to my mind at least fake drugs and medicines are slightly more worrying than fakes watches.

Sure, you can make those arguments over on a "drugs and medicines" forum, because this forum is about watches...so here that is the focus.
But why would you since any effort to prevent it is apparently pointless...![]()
There is also reporting that the income from fake watches is sometimes used for terrorist financing. I wonder if that makes somebody feel good about themselves.
There is also reporting that the income from fake watches is sometimes used for terrorist financing. I wonder if that makes somebody feel good about themselves.
that's nonsense
as for pueblo asking " if i'm okay with this this",....as long as a it's not being sold as real i have no problem with it. reproductions are everywhere with many things besides watches. it will never be stopped.
that's nonsense
as for pueblo asking " if i'm okay with this this",....as long as a it's not being sold as real i have no problem with it. reproductions are everywhere with many things besides watches. it will never be stopped.
that's nonsense
as for pueblo asking " if i'm okay with this this",....as long as a it's not being sold as real i have no problem with it. reproductions are everywhere with many things besides watches. it will never be stopped.

It seems like people are upset because Rolex is playing the "buy stuff and we'll get you what you want after" game? So when I walk into my AD in Montreal (a 2 hour drive away) to ask if they have "fill in the limited watch that you really want here" and get told that they have been allocated to 'good customers' that have purchased watches in the past, how is this different from what is going on with evil Rolex? I would like to have owned the Snoopy speedmaster, the Project Alaska but was denied both as the AD's allocation was already spoken for...like a week after the initial release details came out.
As a consumer, I won't buy an Omega that I don't want just in the hopes of getting bumped up on the priority list for the next limited watch. I'm resigned to the fact that I won't own many of the watches that I want, but as an adult, I'm ok with that...
you can post anything you want determining a money trail. but if i buy a rolex rep the money isn't likely going to fund anything but the pocket of the merchant peddling them.
you can post anything you want determining a money trail. but if i buy a rolex rep the money isn't likely going to fund anything but the pocket of the merchant peddling them.