Contemplating the OP

Posts
315
Likes
1,570
Today, the wife and I were in Stanford, so I decided to do a little investigating the Oyster Perpetual in the white dial. They did not have a 114300 in that color, but they did have the 116000.

I almost instantly feel in love. The white that has been described as "eggshell" is truly amazing! It has a softer glow to it than a pure white, and... I really can't describe why it is so much more appealing than the traditional white, it just IS!



The only gotcha is the 36mm case... or more appropriately, the size of the dial that results using a 36mm case. With the smallest watch in my collection being a 39mm, the dial on the 116000 takes on a much smaller appearance than I'm used to. That's funny because, lug to lug, the 36mm is a PERFECT FIT!

I guess it's something I have to rue over for a couple days. I tried on the grape dialed 114300 for a sense of scale, and that one was the inverse - perfect dial size, slightly largish case.

Alex
Edited:
 
Posts
24
Likes
44
Not sure there's a question in there...but I have to say, it's a sharp looking watch (even if I'm an Omega man). I happen to be wearing a 36mm Tissot at the moment and it seems weird in comparison to my 42 mm Speedy. I'm reminded that older watches were smaller in comparison to today's standard,and when I see these, I think they might be "vintage". Absolutely no help, I know. I'll show myself out to WUS.
 
Posts
224
Likes
248
I think 36mm is the perfect size for a DJ or oyster perpetual. The dial has almost the same color as an enamel dial.
 
Posts
315
Likes
1,570
Not sure there's a question in there...but I have to say, it's a sharp looking watch (even if I'm an Omega man). I happen to be wearing a 36mm Tissot at the moment and it seems weird in comparison to my 42 mm Speedy. I'm reminded that older watches were smaller in comparison to today's standard,and when I see these, I think they might be "vintage". Absolutely no help, I know. I'll show myself out to WUS.

Haha! There technically was no question in there. But you nonetheless confirmed my needing to adjust my thinking to a more "vintage" mode. It's great to know someone else has gone thru the "going smaller" experience so I can draw on that. Thanks and cheers. 😀
 
Posts
537
Likes
808
Haha! There technically was no question in there. But you nonetheless confirmed my needing to adjust my thinking to a more "vintage" mode. It's great to know someone else has gone thru the "going smaller" experience so I can draw on that. Thanks and cheers. 😀

I've just received this in the last few days.. a 30 year old 16220 with a few scars but a lot of character. I bought it as a smaller and dressier alternative to my 216570. The Explorer II is quite odd.. visually it wears larger than 42mm and yet is the single most comfortable and practical watch I own but it really skews your sense of perspective. With the huge dial real estate everything else wears tiny against it.. even my Speedies.

So the DateJust is not only more elegant but is forcing me to readjust my sense of size perspective... quite refreshing to do occasionally I think!

 
Posts
2,578
Likes
11,935
If I were to buy a new Rolex for myself it is to be the white dial 114300 or a 36mm Datejust. I tried on the blue dial 114300 and the size was perfect for me, so my only issue is that I really really like the white gold bezel fluted bezel of the Datejust.

Of course one could buy the 114300 and then buy an older Datejust for almost the same price as a new Datejust.

Looking forward to seeing the white dial in person. I have heard several people say it is amazing.
 
Posts
315
Likes
1,570


One of my favorite watches. All around a perfect compliment to my lifestyle.

Nice! What size is your wrist?
 
Posts
1,370
Likes
837
i really wish rolex would start trending back towards their older aesthetics. these beefy cases just arent for the small wristed