Constellation Lume Identification / Hazard Assessment

Posts
10,230
Likes
16,028
To the OP, do you know the serial? If it’s greater than ~20m that too indicates a high likelihood of tritium. The changeover was around there or just before.

Tritium lume emits only beta particles which is mostly attenuated by the crystal or in the open air a single sheet of paper. It is not much of a hazard vs radium which kicks out alpha and gamma radiation: different gravy.

Beta emitters are safe enough to give to idiot students to play with on a workshop the bench. Ask me now I know.
Edited:
 
Posts
2,753
Likes
6,802
FWIW, I assume this is tritium, and I fully support your decision to research thoroughly and then make your own choices about your health. That’s what I did, and I made the decision to avoid radioactive watches altogether.
 
Posts
20
Likes
5
If I had to make a call, I’d say tritium as well.

  • The colour looks like tritium more than radium.
  • I still can’t recall a confirmed radium watch registering only 0.30.
  • if it continues to glow faintly (I’m a dark room) after being hit with a bright light, that again suggests tritium.
Definitely, I agree with the coloring, at least on the hands.
The lume pips, I can't really tell. Did anyone ever even do lume pips in radium?
Ya, definitely seems to continue glowing for a little while in total darkness, but maybe only ~ 30 seconds.

I've searched through the forum. I found another very similar constellation post, but nothing exactly matching my questions, so I made my own.

Thanks again.
 
Posts
20
Likes
5
To the OP, do you know the serial? If it’s greater than ~20m that too indicates a high likelihood of tritium. The changeover was around there or just before.

Tritium lume emits only beta particles which is mostly attenuated by the crystal or in the open air a single sheet of paper. It is not much of a hazard vs radium which kicks out alpha and gamma radiation: different gravy.

Beta emitters are safe enough to give to idiot students to play with on a workshop the bench. Ask me now I know.
The lume doesn't glow for anywhere near 20 minutes.
I'd say in total darkness it will continue for around 30 seconds, but you almost need to look away to see it in your peripheral vision it's so dim.
The brightest fluorescence fades away in about 5 seconds.

I don't know the serial yet, as I've never removed the caseback. Depending on whether I make the decision to keep wearing it or not, I'll probably choose to have it serviced by Omega, and I'll definitely update this post to include that!
 
Posts
20
Likes
5
FWIW, I assume this is tritium, and I fully support your decision to research thoroughly and then make your own choices about your health. That’s what I did, and I made the decision to avoid radioactive watches altogether.
Thanks! I definitely love the vintage Omega's and would love to have / purchase more in the future (maybe a Seamaster 166.002).
If I do, I'll make sure to choose one without lume to avoid worrying about it the way I am with the Constellation.
 
Posts
3,468
Likes
8,060
The lume doesn't glow for anywhere near 20 minutes.
I'd say in total darkness it will continue for around 30 seconds, but you almost need to look away to see it in your peripheral vision it's so dim.
The brightest fluorescence fades away in about 5 seconds.

I don't know the serial yet, as I've never removed the caseback. Depending on whether I make the decision to keep wearing it or not, I'll probably choose to have it serviced by Omega, and I'll definitely update this post to include that!
central retina better for detail and color, peripheral retina better for low light sensitivity, which is why it helps to not look directly at something dim, but rather to the side.

be very careful about sending vintage watches to omega, this is not generally recommended.
 
Posts
20
Likes
5
central retina better for detail and color, peripheral retina better for low light sensitivity, which is why it helps to not look directly at something dim, but rather to the side.

be very careful about sending vintage watches to omega, this is not generally recommended.
Ooh, that's good to know.
I saw it's $700 for a full overhaul on non-functional / worn-out pieces, and figured it would be best to send to them.
Have you had a bad experience doing that?
 
Posts
3,468
Likes
8,060
Ooh, that's good to know.
I saw it's $700 for a full overhaul on non-functional / worn-out pieces, and figured it would be best to send to them.
Have you had a bad experience doing that?
there's lots of discussion about this on the forum, but Omega has it's own idea about what it means to service a vintage watch, which can include replacing parts, etc. They can end up seriously devaluing a vintage watch and ruining the originality and aesthetics. You cannot be certain of control over the decisions they make in servicing.
For this reason, people will usually find a reputable independent watchmaker with an Omega parts account to work on this type of watch.
(If it were a modern Omega, then it might be a different story).
 
Posts
18,040
Likes
27,347
The lume doesn't glow for anywhere near 20 minutes.
I'd say in total darkness it will continue for around 30 seconds, but you almost need to look away to see it in your peripheral vision it's so dim.
The brightest fluorescence fades away in about 5 seconds.

I don't know the serial yet, as I've never removed the caseback. Depending on whether I make the decision to keep wearing it or not, I'll probably choose to have it serviced by Omega, and I'll definitely update this post to include that!

Luminova- 20 minutes after UV exposure.
Tritium - about 5-30 seconds max after UV.
Radium - no glow after UV exposure once removed.

Do lot send to Omega.

Or Dennis? Have you come home?
 
Posts
20
Likes
5
there's lots of discussion about this on the forum, but Omega has it's own idea about what it means to service a vintage watch, which can include replacing parts, etc. They can end up seriously devaluing a vintage watch and ruining the originality and aesthetics. You cannot be certain of control over the decisions they make in servicing.
For this reason, people will usually find a reputable independent watchmaker with an Omega parts account to work on this type of watch.
(If it were a modern Omega, then it might be a different story).
Thanks! That makes a lot of sense.
Not so worried about devaluing the watch, as I have no plans to sell, but I would definitely like to know what's being replaced vs. kept original.
At some point, it would feel like it's not the same watch anymore.
 
Posts
20
Likes
5
Luminova- 20 minutes after UV exposure.
Tritium - about 5-30 seconds max after UV.
Radium - no glow after UV exposure once removed.

Do lot send to Omega.

Or Dennis? Have you come home?
That's good to know, thanks!
Would this be relatively the same for just a high lumen flashlight like the one I have?

This would indicate that it's likely tritium on my dial.
Also, is Dennis a poster on this forum that services?
Thanks!
 
Posts
18,040
Likes
27,347
That's good to know, thanks!
Would this be relatively the same for just a high lumen flashlight like the one I have?

This would indicate that it's likely tritium on my dial.
Also, is Dennis a poster on this forum that services?
Thanks!

Yes, any flashlight is a UV source unless it has a UV filter.

No it means it is tritium. Unless it has a magical formulation that no one has ever seen before.

No Dennis is not on the forum or doing watch repair.
 
Posts
1,535
Likes
2,628
I'm skeptical that tritium is the correct answer here. Size of the lume pips and UV testing will tell you nothing.

Every consumer grade Geiger counter I've used on a cased tritium dial has not been able to distinguish any meaningful radiation difference from background. The only time I've had the same Geiger counters act up is with radium watches or thoriated lenses. Also, the 0.5µSv/hr reading sounds about right for a transitional period production article. These Constellations never had much lume to begin with, and by the late 50s manufacturers were using less and less radium.


It's hard to draw any definitive conclusions regarding contamination based on the information you've given thus far. Background radiation does fluctuate, and you haven't been specific with your measurement methods. Geiger counters tend to operate by reporting a running average, so it usually takes a minute or two to get a reading that reflects the actual environment. Additionally, your readings may have been fouled by the setting in which you took them. If you have a granite counter for example, that could skew the results taken on it versus another location. Radium can produce some nasty daughter particles, but I'm skeptical that the outside of the watch would be coated with any sort of radioactive dust. The inside? Maybe.


Plastic is generally made of lighter elements that are less susceptible to neutron activation, so it's unlikely that your crystal is substantially radioactive.



Q2, 3: It's hard to say with any meaningful degree of certainty, even assuming there was some degree of contamination. Great risk? Probably not. You'll want to check out just how high mSv/hr counts can go with commercial flights.

Q4: Your best bet for peace of mind would be to approach a professional watchmaker who specializes in re-lumes. Clearly state that you want to have all of the luminous material removed. You can also ask if the watchmaker offers the option to replace luminous with inert ZnS, which will have a similar custard hue to the original luminous material. Any watchmaker should be able to replace the luminous with modern Superluminova if you want to restore the glow in the dark function.

For what it's worth, OP, I think that it's fair to be concerned about radiation. In some ways, watches can pose more of a risk than other radioactive collectibles like photography lenses and uranium glassware, not because of how radioactive the material is, but because lume binder is very brittle and can result in the luminous material disintegrating into a fine powder that can result in real contamination. As vintage watch cases tend to lose their hermetic sealing, it's reasonable to just not want to deal with something like that.
 
Posts
10,230
Likes
16,028
The lume doesn't glow for anywhere near 20 minutes.
I'd say in total darkness it will continue for around 30 seconds, but you almost need to look away to see it in your peripheral vision it's so dim.
The brightest fluorescence fades away in about 5 seconds.

I don't know the serial yet, as I've never removed the caseback. Depending on whether I make the decision to keep wearing it or not, I'll probably choose to have it serviced by Omega, and I'll definitely update this post to include that!
Get the back taken off and get serial number. The changeover from radium to tritium occurred around the 20,000,000 mark ie 20 million, I wasn’t referring to 20 minutes at all.

Omega changed both dial and hand lume over at that point from radium so a watch would not have left the factory with a mismatch. Of course older hands or a dial could have been retrofitted later but it is not unusual for a dial and hands on a given watch to behave differently despite both using the same lume material as they were usually supplied by different manufacturers.

I personally think you are worrying about nothing here. It looks exactly like pale tritium and the timeline (if you have it correct) matches that. It is very rare for radium lume to remain as pale as yours. Vanishingly so in fact.

Oh and if you send it to omega they will destroy all its character and relieve you of more than it is actually worth. Unless you can get them to keep the dial and hands which isn’t easy. It’s a lovely thing. To swap out what is there would be criminal.

If you seriously can’t cope with the presence of virtually inactive tritium, as Dan bluntly says, sell it and buy something with SL lume and sleep soundly. But never get a plane ride or chest X-Ray again either.
Edited:
 
Posts
7
Likes
15
maybe consider mounting the watch on one of those 1960's style "wristcuffs" made out of lead? 😁

 
Posts
2,753
Likes
6,802
Please do not send the watch to Omega, unless you really want a “shiny new” watch. If you want a serviced watch, there are lots of independent watchmakers experienced with vintage watches that will service the watch well and at a much better price, without changing the appearance of the watch.
 
Posts
20
Likes
5
I'm skeptical that tritium is the correct answer here. Size of the lume pips and UV testing will tell you nothing.

Every consumer grade Geiger counter I've used on a cased tritium dial has not been able to distinguish any meaningful radiation difference from background. The only time I've had the same Geiger counters act up is with radium watches or thoriated lenses. Also, the 0.5µSv/hr reading sounds about right for a transitional period production article. These Constellations never had much lume to begin with, and by the late 50s manufacturers were using less and less radium.
I took into account the size of the lume pips since most radium-dialed watches I've seen have radium for all the numerical indices (a lot of radium). The lume pips, and the slim lume on the hands of my watch are much smaller, so I figured they might produce a lesser reading.
It's hard to draw any definitive conclusions regarding contamination based on the information you've given thus far. Background radiation does fluctuate, and you haven't been specific with your measurement methods. Geiger counters tend to operate by reporting a running average, so it usually takes a minute or two to get a reading that reflects the actual environment. Additionally, your readings may have been fouled by the setting in which you took them. If you have a granite counter for example, that could skew the results taken on it versus another location. Radium can produce some nasty daughter particles, but I'm skeptical that the outside of the watch would be coated with any sort of radioactive dust. The inside? Maybe.
I fully agree, and have started making more experimental readings.
I'm taking four, 30 minute measurements in a separate room, the room where the watch is stored, as well as at the 2, 4, 8, and 10 hour positions directly adjacent to the dial.
Will run stats on the average and the max readings.
Plastic is generally made of lighter elements that are less susceptible to neutron activation, so it's unlikely that your crystal is substantially radioactive.
Good to know, thanks!
Q2, 3: It's hard to say with any meaningful degree of certainty, even assuming there was some degree of contamination. Great risk? Probably not. You'll want to check out just how high mSv/hr counts can go with commercial flights.
Commercial flights definitely are a much higher exposure. What I've been worried about is any ingestion of radioactivity where it could potentially irradiate surrounding tissue across time.
Q4: Your best bet for peace of mind would be to approach a professional watchmaker who specializes in re-lumes. Clearly state that you want to have all of the luminous material removed. You can also ask if the watchmaker offers the option to replace luminous with inert ZnS, which will have a similar custard hue to the original luminous material. Any watchmaker should be able to replace the luminous with modern Superluminova if you want to restore the glow in the dark function.
That's great to know, thanks. I've called quite a few places, and nobody seems to want to do that, but I'll keep calling.
For what it's worth, OP, I think that it's fair to be concerned about radiation. In some ways, watches can pose more of a risk than other radioactive collectibles like photography lenses and uranium glassware, not because of how radioactive the material is, but because lume binder is very brittle and can result in the luminous material disintegrating into a fine powder that can result in real contamination. As vintage watch cases tend to lose their hermetic sealing, it's reasonable to just not want to deal with something like that.
Thanks again!
 
Posts
20
Likes
5
Get the back taken off and get serial number. The changeover from radium to tritium occurred around the 20,000,000 mark ie 20 million, I wasn’t referring to 20 minutes at all.

Omega changed both dial and hand lume over at that point from radium so a watch would not have left the factory with a mismatch. Of course older hands or a dial could have been retrofitted later but it is not unusual for a dial and hands on a given watch to behave differently despite both using the same lume material as they were usually supplied by different manufacturers.

Ah gotcha. Makes sense.
I personally think you are worrying about nothing here. It looks exactly like pale tritium and the timeline (if you have it correct) matches that. It is very rare for radium lume to remain as pale as yours. Vanishingly so in fact.

Oh and if you send it to omega they will destroy all its character and relieve you of more than it is actually worth. Unless you can get them to keep the dial and hands which isn’t easy. It’s a lovely thing. To swap out what is there would be criminal.

If you seriously can’t cope with the presence of virtually inactive tritium, as Dan bluntly says, sell it and buy something with SL lume and sleep soundly. But never get a plane ride or chest X-Ray again either.
I also think it looks like tritium, but want to be as certain as possible, since I'll either continue wearing it, or keep it in a display case.
Thanks!
 
Posts
20
Likes
5
Please do not send the watch to Omega, unless you really want a “shiny new” watch. If you want a serviced watch, there are lots of independent watchmakers experienced with vintage watches that will service the watch well and at a much better price, without changing the appearance of the watch.
I'll keep searching! Haven't found a good one out here yet!
 
Posts
23,022
Likes
51,468
I'm skeptical that tritium is the correct answer here. Size of the lume pips and UV testing will tell you nothing.

Every consumer grade Geiger counter I've used on a cased tritium dial has not been able to distinguish any meaningful radiation difference from background. The only time I've had the same Geiger counters act up is with radium watches or thoriated lenses. Also, the 0.5µSv/hr reading sounds about right for a transitional period production article. These Constellations never had much lume to begin with, and by the late 50s manufacturers were using less and less radium.
^this