Speedmaster 145.022-68 assessment

Posts

756

Likes

1,066

Dsplash

·Jul 14, 2025

Hi all!
I came across this 145.022-68 locally.
The dial and hands seem nice, the DON has some chips but overall not that bad but I’m a little more concerned about the case’s polishing condition. Service crown but that’s not that big of a deal…
Asked price 5.8k€ with the 1039
Any input appreciated 😀
Thanks!

Edited: Jul 14, 2025

 

Posts

2,575

Likes

46,124

Alex Cheers

·Jul 14, 2025·Go!!!

Looks like two different watches in the pictures, mixed up when uploading maybe?

 

Posts

756

Likes

1,066

Dsplash

·Jul 14, 2025

Tou are absolutely right! The first one was from an other watch 😀

 

Posts

32

Likes

40

ahlgringo

·Jul 14, 2025

With the 1039 and correct end links- I would say price- not bad, and about what I would expect. The case has obviously been scrubbed a bit and I really don't like the CG's, but for the entire package there is some value there- just depends on what you are looking for and what you want to spend. Could always swap the case for better if you ever found better. I like the dial- which is what I care about most.

 

Posts

1,699

Likes

3,455

Ron_W

·Jul 14, 2025

I was on the fence for this one but it just did not click with me. Very attractive dial but the case not so much. I dont see a logo in the crystal ?

 

Posts

1,205

Likes

5,035

apsm100

·Jul 14, 2025·Noob taxpayer

Case has seen polish. Dial looks okay. Hands maybe repainted and relumed. Drop chrono hand isn't right for these from what I know.

I'd pass at that price as prices seem to be falling for these.

 

Posts

3,343

Likes

7,384

SOG53

·Jul 14, 2025

Anyone else think those pusher necks look wide? Have you seen inside? Any chance it’s a 105.012 -66?

 

Posts

6,326

Likes

21,558

pdxleaf

·Jul 14, 2025·"I cut it TWICE and it's still short!"

SOG53

Anyone else think those pusher necks look wide? Have you seen inside? Any chance it’s a 105.012 -66?

I was wondering this also.

anyone else see remnants of a CB case?

Edit: profile doesn't match CB case, too thick. But the sides might be shaved slightly? I'm spit balling here. It's what my first instincts read

Calling @ndgal

Edit 2: the case profile looks like the Mark 4, which is a dash 68 case. Got me scratching my head.

Edited: Jul 14, 2025

 

Posts

1,205

Likes

5,035

apsm100

·Jul 14, 2025·Noob taxpayer

pdxleaf

I was wondering this also.

anyone else see remnants of a CB case?

It's definitely an HF case from the profile.

 

Posts

6,326

Likes

21,558

pdxleaf

·Jul 14, 2025·"I cut it TWICE and it's still short!"

apsm100

It's definitely an HF case from the profile.

Think you're right.

The dial is very attractive. It'd be a nice wearing watch

 

Posts

2,605

Likes

5,781

hansaboy

·Jul 14, 2025

The dial...?
I tried to zoom in and are there white spots on it?
It looks a bit grainy and rough...
The subdials - is it the quality of the pictures, or is there a white edge?

 

Posts

1,699

Likes

3,455

Ron_W

·Jul 15, 2025

pdxleaf

Edit 2: the case profile looks like the Mark 4, which is a dash 68 case

I agree its a -68 case profile.

 

Posts

1,205

Likes

5,035

apsm100

·Jul 15, 2025·Noob taxpayer

Ron_W

I agree its a -68 case profile.

Aren't the mark 2 and 4 cases the same?

 

Posts

1,699

Likes

3,455

Ron_W

·Jul 15, 2025

apsm100

Aren't the mark 2 and 4 cases the same?

There is an overlap in Mk4 from 145.012 - 68 to 145.022 early 69s as per the above picture. If you combine this with the movement number of this watch it fits for a -68. The MK2 is slightly different according to chronoholic.com.

 

Posts

2,605

Likes

5,781

hansaboy

·Jul 15, 2025

And a movement picture?
And also the inside of the caseback...

 

Posts

6,326

Likes

21,558

pdxleaf

·Jul 15, 2025·"I cut it TWICE and it's still short!"

apsm100

Aren't the mark 2 and 4 cases the same?

the MK4 version is in essence the same caseband as MK2 only the MK4 is fitted for screw-in pushers. Per the chronoholic blog.

So the OP would need to check the pushers if there was a question.

 

Posts

756

Likes

1,066

Dsplash

·Jul 15, 2025

Thanks for all the answers!
Here are the movement and inner caseback

 

Posts

3,343

Likes

7,384

SOG53

·Jul 15, 2025

Ok we like a slow reveal!! Inside looks ok few screw marks. Pusher necks don’t look so fat now.

 

Posts

756

Likes

1,066

Dsplash

·Jul 16, 2025

Ron_W

There is an overlap in Mk4 from 145.012 - 68 to 145.022 early 69s as per the above picture. If you combine this with the movement number of this watch it fits for a -68. The MK2 is slightly different according to chronoholic.com.

So, how bad is the case’s condition for a mk4? 😁

 

Posts

6,326

Likes

21,558

pdxleaf

·Jul 16, 2025·"I cut it TWICE and it's still short!"

Dsplash

So, how bad is the case’s condition for a mk4? 😁

I'm confused. Some photos, like the side brushing, look great.

This might be a reflection, but it looks like a wierd curve

The rear looks very polished

This 68 is clearly different but I don't know if this is normal.

I can't be much help, I 'm afraid

Are these pressed in or screw in? I can't see any threads?