trama
·I have a reduced. Never wished it was a Professional. I love automatics. Been wearing it 25 years, serviced as necessary (I beat the crap out of it as a young feller).
Dude get a Pro. Its the only watch in everybody's top 10, and for all sorts of reasons.
Guys. I'm not trying to be a contrarian. I'm sure they're wonderful, but I'm just not interested... and for all sorts of reasons.
Y'all finally got me interested in the looks of the Moonwatch, but I just don't want to wear something that large. Because I'm interested in the looks and not the NASA connection, the Reduced seems to be a good alternative, especially if I get the latest version with the less cluttered dial. I also consider the 10 bar water resistance, sapphire crystal, and self-winding movement bonuses. YMMV. So aside from higher service costs, what downsides am I missing in considering this model? Thanks in advance
Stu
LOL! Funny you should mention it. One of those octopi is on my wrist right now - a white dial COSC model I bought new at a boutique. Now that was a mistake!
Well I think the general consensus is the speedy reduced isn't the boil on the arse of mankind like previously thought.
So here's the recap, some people actually like the size of the reduced better and don't give a toss it's not been into space. This thread needs to be less moonwatch biased and more on showing the different variations of the reduced model. Any pictures of the different models fellas?
So here's the recap, some people actually like the size of the reduced better and don't give a toss it's not been into space.
This thread needs to be less moonwatch biased
As for higher servicing costs, that is not true? Omega charges the same price for a full service for all chronograph movements that are considered current calibre. So servicing a Speedmaster pro with 1861 or the reduced with 3220 will cost the same whopping $1,065 (Singapore dollars). This was what I was told when I had my used reduced authenticated and pressure tested at the Omega (Swatch) service centre here.