Cleaning a vintage dial

Posts
20
Likes
3
I have this Seamaster bumper that has gunk at the edges between markers 12 and 1, 8 and 9, 5 and 6, and 6 and 7. The local watchmaker wouldn’t entertain the idea of cleaning those spots and said to leave it alone. Is he right? I plan to change out the old hands at some point with a different watchmaker. Should I tell them to clean it then? Don’t get me wrong, I love the patina the watch has developed, it’s just the dang gunk that’s got to go.
 
Posts
13,347
Likes
31,468
The local watchmaker wouldn’t entertain the idea of cleaning those spots and said to leave it alone. Is he right?

Yes.
 
Posts
7,231
Likes
57,544
The problem, and your watchmaker probably explained this, is that using any cleaning agent or abrasive will inevitably irretrievably damage the dial.

Your photos are not sharp enough to see what the gunk between 5 - 7 is nor the condition of the hands.

Yours is a seventy year old watch and the likelihood of your finding age appropriate hands that would not look out of place is minimal.

As the medics say, “First, do no harm”.
 
Posts
8,698
Likes
14,600
1200x630wp.png
 
Posts
2,697
Likes
28,668
@Canuck gently cleaned the dial on this watch if I recall correctly. But he is a second or third generation watchmaker.

Stick to gaming!
 
Posts
20
Likes
3
The problem, and your watchmaker probably explained this, is that using any cleaning agent or abrasive will inevitably irretrievably damage the dial.

Your photos are not sharp enough to see what the gunk between 5 - 7 is nor the condition of the hands.

Yours is a seventy year old watch and the likelihood of your finding age appropriate hands that would not look out of place is minimal.

As the medics say, “First, do no harm”.
Honestly, he didn't explain any of that -- he just said no. The gunk just seems caked along the edges. I've been assuming it would be an easy clean up. He's a watchmaker that I met at the mall who has experience servicing old omegas. My watchmaker, who I bought the watch from, runs a small store. He has decades of experience servicing Omega watches. I haven't brought the question up to him. He sourced out the proper hands for me and I'm set to meet him next week -- maybe I'll ask him then.
 
Posts
20,053
Likes
46,680
Generally speaking, it's not a good idea, and we certainly can't tell based on those photos. Your watchmaker can take a a close look when he has it apart.
 
Posts
1,693
Likes
3,470
Why are you changing the hands? And learn to love the gunk. Comes with territory
 
Posts
6,146
Likes
25,699
Anyone else seeing this?

😕

Yes, but I just redid my authentication.
Yup. As Dan says, it’s quite bizarre as it’s not an ad. It’s a jpeg the OP embedded into the post for some reason.
 
Posts
20
Likes
3
Im changing the hands because sweeper hand is slightly bent downward and slit in mon/hr hands experiencing a little rust. Watchmaker had era specific parts and said the 1 year warranty covers the repair. Lol shame on me for wanting the watch to look a bit cleaner. If y’all are gonna nitpick my post, forget I asked anything…
 
Posts
8,698
Likes
14,600
Im changing the hands because sweeper hand is slightly bent downward and slit in mon/hr hands experiencing a little rust. Watchmaker had era specific parts and said the 1 year warranty covers the repair. Lol shame on me for wanting the watch to look a bit cleaner. If y’all are gonna nitpick my post, forget I asked anything…
Okay, done.
 
Posts
20,053
Likes
46,680
@bronco1626 I have a very similar Seamaster and always considered the hands to be original, are they not?
Apparently, we're not allowed to talk about the hands.
 
Posts
13,347
Likes
31,468
Apparently, we're not allowed to talk about the hands.

Well who knows where his hands have been?