I once had a Breitling watch made for the French Air Force that was pretty similar to your Chronosport, and used the same ESA movement.
And predictably, it was similarly prone to failure.
In fact, my dad had bought this watch already non-functional in the mid-1980s. He had tried to have it repaired by Breitling, but they declined and offered a discount on a new watch instead.
Then, after my dad's passing in 2004, I inherited this timepiece. By that time, I had forgotten about my dad's attempt to have it repaired, so I naively sent it back to Breitling for a full service. It's no surprise that I got a similar answer, with the brand offering me a massive discount on a brand new B1. But I was not interested, and asked to have my watch back. And asked again. And again, more forcefully this time. It was obvious that Breitling was not keen on letting it go, but they finally relented. But when this chrono returned, its caseback was so tightly shut that it took the strength of two people and a dedicated tool from a watchmaker friend to have it opened. I can't believe that this was not a deliberate attempt to condemn access to its insides.
Anyway, after a bit of research, I located a donor watch with a functional ESA movement, and my watchmaker made the swap.
I later sold it to a French collector who also had the Yema with the same movement that the French Air Force tested at the same time as this Breitling, allowing him to complete his collection. It is to be noted that the fragility of these watches led the French military to select watches from Pulsar instead.