Chronographs classified as Chronometres.

Posts
17,576
Likes
26,635
Following on the other recent thread about Chronometre on the dial (that particular watch did not have a serialized mvmt), then I assume it would be a similar problem if you have a HPC marked dial (time only), with this under the hood? We have to assume, what, that someone has swapped the dial or mvmt?

Or are the rules different for HPC dials vs Chronometre dials?
A movement marked unadjusted and if HPC means High precision.... might show a disconnect somewhere. Its only a 18,000 movement so its not like they are taking a higher bpm to mean more accuracy either.
 
Posts
817
Likes
3,458
Following on the other recent thread about Chronometre on the dial (that particular watch did not have a serialized mvmt), then I assume it would be a similar problem if you have a HPC marked dial (time only), with this under the hood? We have to assume, what, that someone has swapped the dial or mvmt?

Or are the rules different for HPC dials vs Chronometre dials?
Welcome to my conundrum...ugh. Will be interested to see any replies.
 
Posts
3,234
Likes
7,688
A movement marked unadjusted and if HPC means High precision.... might show a disconnect somewhere. Its only a 18,000 movement so its not like they are taking a higher bpm to mean more accuracy either.

agreed, I am just trying to understand the conventions, because it seems perhaps there are differences in how HPC designation was done, vs the later use of Chronometre designation. If I understand correctly HPC can be either chronograph or time only, but Chronometre is time only, and comes with a certificate?

I feel like I have seen multiple examples now of HPC dials without serialized movements, so it makes me wonder, are they all really frankens? As to the later use of Chronometre, I am less familiar, and less researched, and it seems more formal, with certificate, so I am less comfortable without serialized mvmt....
 
Posts
257
Likes
155
Perhaps the clincher for the HPC designation would be an example of any additional paperwork that was supplied with the watch. Did this have any method for identifing the particular watch, like a serial number?
 
Posts
17,576
Likes
26,635
Perhaps the clincher for the HPC designation would be an example of any additional paperwork that was supplied with the watch. Did this have any method for identifing the particular watch, like a serial number?
If it means high precision, then it would not have a movement marked un adjusted.
 
Posts
12,576
Likes
16,969
Movements marked “Unadjusted” were for the US market. Extra customs duties were assessed on each adjustment to movements imported from Switzerland in those days.

I would be surprised if any of the HPC watches were originally sold in the US.

I would also have concerns about any HPC marked watch that did not have a serial number on the movement.

Hope this helps,
gatorcpa
 
Posts
3,234
Likes
7,688
Movements marked “Unadjusted” were for the US market. Extra customs duties were assessed on each adjustment to movements imported from Switzerland in those days.

I would be surprised if any of the HPC watches were originally sold in the US.

I would also have concerns about any HPC marked watch that did not have a serial number on the movement.

Hope this helps,
gatorcpa

yes makes sense, this line of thinking seems reasonable.

so my next question becomes, anytime you see an HPC or Chronometer designated dial, without a serialized mvmt, then someone has been creating frankens?
 
Posts
12,576
Likes
16,969
so my next question becomes, anytime you see an HPC or Chronometer designated dial, without a serialized mvmt, then someone has been creating frankens?
In my mind it would be suspect. I'm not sure how a chronometer grade movement could be identified by the watch company without a serial number, since there would be no way for them to distinguish it from movements not tested. Also, the certificates generally have the serial number of the movement as well as a case number (if that manufacturer used case serial numbers).
gatorcpa
 
Posts
3,234
Likes
7,688
Two more examples......

in the first the dial is marked HPC and the cal 263 does not seem to have any special markings...



second example, dial is marked HPC, at least "unadjusted" is missing from the bridge, but I don't see a mvmt serial, perhaps it is being covered by the oscillating weight?

 
Posts
3,234
Likes
7,688
Here is another HPC example with no markings of any kind on the cal 263. Seller says NOS, unworn, but seems like wrong crown and strap is much later period UG, so perhaps shenanigans?
 
Posts
3,234
Likes
7,688
Have we established any rules at all to date on HPC ? I feel like we are lost in the weeds........
 
Posts
312
Likes
1,041
Here is another HPC example with no markings of any kind on the cal 263. Seller says NOS, unworn, but seems like wrong crown and strap is much later period UG, so perhaps shenanigans?
this is one lovely example.
 
Posts
1,164
Likes
2,951
Have we established any rules at all to date on HPC ? I feel like we are lost in the weeds........

We have definitely not got to the bottom of this but here's what I think we do know:

- There is at least one UG advert showing a watch with 'HPC' on the dial (Sala P224) and therefore it's quite likely that watches left the factory with HPC dials

- Sala (P220) explains that it stands for High Precision Chronometer. I'm not aware of any additional proof that this is correct.

- We see HPC on chronographs and time-only watches.

- We only see 'Chronometre' on time-only watches. These all have serialised movements. There is a good thread here about verifying chronometres https://omegaforums.net/threads/universal-geneve-chronometre-how-to-verify.81943/

- What is clear is that HPC and 'Chronometre' dial designations did not mean the same thing. It was not simply that one came before the other; they co-existed.

- I am not aware of a single watch with an HPC dial that has the features that I would expect to see on a chronometre movement e.g. I've not seen an HPC watch with a bumper movement without 'unadjusted' on the bridge.

- Perhaps watches with HPC dials were sold in countries with less stringent regulations regarding chronometers? Or perhaps it was purely a marketing strategy and actually meant very little at all? What is puzzling however is how few HPC dials we see. If it meant very little and watches didn't have to pass stringent tests in order to have the HPC designation, then why not put it on more watches?

Here's an HPC Polerouter that I picked up recently. The Cal 138ss movement is completely standard without serial number etc.

 
Posts
3,234
Likes
7,688
We have definitely not got to the bottom of this but here's what I think we do know:

- There is at least one UG advert showing a watch with 'HPC' on the dial (Sala P224) and therefore it's quite likely that watches left the factory with HPC dials

- Sala (P220) explains that it stands for High Precision Chronometer. I'm not aware of any additional proof that this is correct.

- We see HPC on chronographs and time-only watches.

- We only see 'Chronometre' on time-only watches. These all have serialised movements. There is a good thread here about verifying chronometres https://omegaforums.net/threads/universal-geneve-chronometre-how-to-verify.81943/

- What is clear is that HPC and 'Chronometre' dial designations did not mean the same thing. It was not simply that one came before the other; they co-existed.

- I am not aware of a single watch with an HPC dial that has the features that I would expect to see on a chronometre movement e.g. I've not seen an HPC watch with a bumper movement without 'unadjusted' on the bridge.

- Perhaps watches with HPC dials were sold in countries with less stringent regulations regarding chronometers? Or perhaps it was purely a marketing strategy and actually meant very little at all? What is puzzling however is how few HPC dials we see. If it meant very little and watches didn't have to pass stringent tests in order to have the HPC designation, then why not put it on more watches?

Here's an HPC Polerouter that I picked up recently. The Cal 138ss movement is completely standard without serial number etc.


Yes I follow your logic, and agree. My first question would be if we have ever seen a single example of an HPC dial WITH any special markings on the mvmt? I cannot recall offhand. I know we have seen many many examples of HPC without any special markings on the mvmt. In fact so many it starts to confuse me, as I cannot imagine that every single one of these examples suggests a transplanted dial, its just too improbable.
 
Posts
5,503
Likes
8,593
From the catalogue of the '100 years UG' auction by AQ in 1994 (also interesting: Compax at top with leaf hands and double 45 (I have a double 45 as well but unfortunately without leaf hands)):
 
Posts
3,234
Likes
7,688
From the catalogue of the '100 years UG' auction by AQ in 1994 (also interesting: Compax at top with leaf hands and double 45 (I have a double 45 as well but unfortunately without leaf hands)):

I wonder if this is a misunderstanding that has been perpetuated, because we don't seem to be finding evidence of HPC dial watches being tested at Le Bureau de CDC ??
 
Posts
5,503
Likes
8,593
Seems not that logic to me as well. As far as I know they tested movements which would be delivered as movement only (i.e. not installed in a case). If they tested complete watches it may have made sense to just sell them afterwards
 
Posts
1,164
Likes
2,951
As I understand it, before COSC was formed in 1973, there were various rival local offices evaluating movements with differing approaches and levels of rigour.

Perhaps the watches marked 'chronometre' were evaluated in a different office from watches marked 'HPC' and hence a completely different approach was used?

HPC cannot surely mean nothing at all as otherwise why would we see it on so few watches and why is it used in UG advertising?
 
Posts
3,234
Likes
7,688
As I understand it, before COSC was formed in 1973, there were various rival local offices evaluating movements with differing approaches and levels of rigour.

Perhaps the watches marked 'chronometre' were evaluated in a different office from watches marked 'HPC' and hence a completely different approach was used?

HPC cannot surely mean nothing at all as otherwise why would we see it on so few watches and why is it used in UG advertising?

Agreed. But the main problem we are facing is there seems to be no criteria at to evaluate a HPC dialed watch ?