Chronographs classified as Chronometres.

Posts
257
Likes
155
According to this 1950's ad, some chronographs were classified as chronometres.


Anyone ever seen one, does Sala list them?
 
Posts
2,926
Likes
6,224
It is my understanding that chronographs marked "H.P.C." are "High Precision Chronometres". They are very hard to find.
.
 
Posts
6,713
Likes
18,556
No different from any other as far as I know
 
Posts
257
Likes
155
No different from any other as far as I know
So no evidence on the movement that it is a chronometre.
Shouldn't there be?
Some thing like "Adjusted 5 positions".
Otherwise the HPC on the dial could mean High Precision Chronograph or even be an attempt to defraud.
@ ModestProposal...where did your info. re HPC come from?
 
Posts
6,713
Likes
18,556
Sala, page 220, dial marking also seen in an original UG advert on page 224.

Are you suggesting UG engaged in systematic fraud?🍿
 
Posts
257
Likes
155
Sala, page 220, dial marking also seen in an original UG advert on page 224.

Are you suggesting UG engaged in systematic fraud?🍿
I haven't got Sala so I haven't seen the examples you cite. But do we know what HPC means?
 
Posts
257
Likes
155
Here is another HPC.


Since it isn't a chronograph can we assume C means Chronometre?
 
Posts
17,553
Likes
26,576
HPC could be marketing. It has no legal definition like chronometer does.
 
Posts
6,713
Likes
18,556
I haven't got Sala so I haven't seen the examples you cite. But do we know what HPC means?

High Precision Chronometer, according to Sala. His source is unknown.

HPC could be marketing. It has no legal definition like chronometer does.

So why wouldn't all of their pieces be so marked?

Here is another HPC.


Since it isn't a chronograph can we assume C means Chronometre?

Very interesting
 
Posts
255
Likes
314
HPC stands indeed for High Precision Chronometre, apparently these (rare) pieces were subject to stricter regulations upon manufacturing.
For sure the level of finishing was the same and not higher.
Even though I dont know I suspect that when new and sold they came with some kind of extra paper work certifing the chronometre status, kind of like a bulletin or extra certification of sort. That is probably why there is no sign of this on the movement itself.
This was not that uncommon with other manufactures back then.
 
Posts
3,151
Likes
13,674
Polerouter HPC here:
32061.jpg
(thanks)
 
Posts
257
Likes
155
There seems to have been some change from the use of "H.P.C." to "Chronometre". The ad. in my OP clearly uses this latter word and describes the testing and issue of relevant paperwork. Was there some change in regulations?
We know that later Chronometres like the RailRouter had inscribed info. on the movement., visible to the right of the U logo in this photo.
Edited:
 
Posts
255
Likes
314
well I would neither the case nor the dial of this watch is original.... I would also have lots of doubts about the movement considering the placements of the buttons...
 
Posts
891
Likes
1,656
@Moahunter is this meant to be only for UG only or are other takers welcome?
I can think of at least one of the top of my head. The very lovely Sinn EZM1 issued. They would have the chronometer id engraved on case back.
Either way still got me interested in some weekend reading.

Thanks
p
 
Posts
3,227
Likes
7,677
Following on the other recent thread about Chronometre on the dial (that particular watch did not have a serialized mvmt), then I assume it would be a similar problem if you have a HPC marked dial (time only), with this under the hood? We have to assume, what, that someone has swapped the dial or mvmt?

Or are the rules different for HPC dials vs Chronometre dials?