Cal.266 Omega with badly damaged lug

Posts
51
Likes
20
I bought an 18K 1964 Ref 111.007 Omega from ebay recently. The watch was described as good condition, light marks to lugs from normal use.

On delivery, one of the lugs had a dent, but the other appears to have been re-soldered back onto the body and melted! It looks like then someone deformed it to make it fit the 18mm strap bar.

The strap bar fits into it, in a newly-made hole, but this side of the strap is held closer to the watch body. The aesthetics are bad and the grip of the strap bar is unreliable.

I think that the lug needs removing, reshaping and refitting.

Is this something anyone has experience of? Is the watch irrevocably damaged and salvage-only value? The mechanism works.

It's a nice watch and the ebayer is strangely refusing to acknowledge that the damage is more than his description of 'light marks'.
 
Posts
51
Likes
20
The lug damage from the front (a bit less obvious). Such a shame, as it's an 18K watch. I guess I'd see the watch itself as looking a bit tired and the face has some 'patination', but I don't mind this so much.

I don't think it would have been expensive for a watch without the lug damage, but I don't know how difficult/costly this is to repair?
 
Posts
3,199
Likes
12,620
Return it. This won’t be an easy fix, rather a quite expensive one. Also, the dial doesn’t belong in this case. It’s a 50s cursive writing Genève dial, while your ref is from a DeVille, I believe. Even after a repair it’ll still be a Frankenwatch.
 
Posts
3,460
Likes
9,383
A good goldsmith could fix that easily enough, finding a good goldsmith though...

I'd return it, it is not in the condition it was described as and has the wrong dial.
 
Posts
51
Likes
20
Thanks! Paid Euro 850. I fell into a hole in the ground with a 'silly' signpost above it??
 
Posts
370
Likes
362
this is awful ... no way it can be fixed at reasonable cost .. send it back !!
 
Posts
9,066
Likes
47,114
At best, this is a franken. At worst, it’s fraud from a disreputable seller. Return it and request a refund. If the seller gives you a hard time, contact eBay and advise them in detail of how the watch does not comport with the description in the listing. eBay will back you up on this. I would also respectfully suggest that you stop shopping on eBay and similar sites until you gain more knowledge of how to properly evaluate vintage watches. Stick to the private sale listings on OF.
 
Posts
51
Likes
20
At best, this is a franken. At worst, it’s fraud from a disreputable seller. Return it and request a refund. If the seller gives you a hard time, contact eBay and advise them in detail of how the watch does not comport with the description in the listing. eBay will back you up on this. I would also respectfully suggest that you stop shopping on eBay and similar sites until you gain more knowledge of how to properly evaluate vintage watches. Stick to the private sale listings on OF.

I asked the seller for a return. He refused. I said we'd let ebay decide. He got the jump on me and referred it to ebay (?the referrer gets an advantage - I doubt this?). Strangely, he has said to ebay that I've 'manipulated' the watch or photos to show damage where there was none in his sold watch! I've never experienced this before. It's very disheartening in a moral sense; in one's trust for the world. But I have to find the positive: a wake-up call for naivety in me?

Anyway, let's see what ebay say.

I appreciate your suggestion about learning more before shopping on risky sites. Sound advice indeed. I feel I'm learning a lot from these posts and from browsing OF. Also, links to ref. and cal. and serial number information is tremendous!
 
Posts
9,066
Likes
47,114
eBay will usually side with the buyer when there’s a dispute. You might want to post the link to the original listing or a copy of the listing if the link no longer works so that we can better evaluate what the seller actually represented. I’m not sure how the seller can accuse you of manipulating the watch or the photos when the watch was clearly a franken to begin with (a watch that is put together using parts from several different references).
Edited:
 
Posts
20,913
Likes
47,865
I think your problem may be that the damage was quite obvious in the listing.
 
Posts
51
Likes
20
I think your problem may be that the damage was quite obvious in the listing.

I appreciate your thoughts. It's important that I take responsibility too. Looking back, I should have been more careful and cautious.
 
Posts
20,913
Likes
47,865
I appreciate your thoughts. It's important that I take responsibility too. Looking back, I should have been more careful and cautious.

Perhaps the seller should have called out the damage explicitly, but the gold spot price is quite high right now, and he does mention the weight of the watch, suggesting melt value. The watch's value as parts and scrap may not be too different from what you paid.

Edit: The case could be 15-20g at $45 per gram (18k), and the movement and other parts have some value.
 
Posts
51
Likes
20
Thanks Dan. Good points.

I had thought that Euro 850 for a gold Omega watch sounded cheap. I think I should probably let it all go, and move on with a note to be less greedy and more cautious in future. A learning experience!