Burgundy bronze gold Seamaster release

Posts
2,875
Likes
5,356
An aficionado is not a connaisseur. The others are always phonies.

But an aficionado might be a cannister, or even a balustrade. How would you ever know?
 
Posts
2,875
Likes
5,356
More importantly, Omega finally came out with a bronze gold deployant clasp so the other bronze gold Seamaster can finally get a folding clasp instead of the pin buckle.

ooooh, nice
 
Posts
1,146
Likes
572
But an aficionado might be a cannister, or even a balustrade. How would you ever know?
I can only tell you to beware of experts. There are many in the world of horology.
 
Posts
2,875
Likes
5,356
I can only tell you to beware of experts. There are many in the world of horology.
See, this we can agree on. Most of them are expert whorologists, and perhaps not horology-experts? Drat, that word-order thing again, it's going to be the dearth of us awl
 
Posts
2,875
Likes
5,356
On a more serious note- does anyone see the direction Omega is taking the SMP platform, as similar to how Rolex utilizes the Sub platform? Essentially every Rolex is a sub. It seems like Omega is branching the SMP line in a way that keeps the most key design elements- lyre lugs, scalloped bezel, skeleton hands, hour markers- and then allowing the dial to play. Texture, color, waves/wave type- and dials honestly are a strength of Omega's.

If so... it's honestly a good move. the green-bronze-titanium, this burgundy-bronze, and the new old-wave no-date, are all lookers and still absolutely unmistakably SMP300s. I could see this working really well for Omega, assuming there's intention behind it.
 
Posts
122
Likes
132
I don't care what they call it, I ain't paying $27k for one. Maybe they'll go the Rolex GMT route and call it the Ironman.
 
Posts
7,497
Likes
34,506
Seeing the prices of these modern Omega's certainly makes me feel good about the vintage Omega 18kt gold watch and bracelet combi's in my collection....I mean $31K for 9kt...c'mon!
 
Posts
1,606
Likes
3,820
Seeing the prices of these modern Omega's certainly makes me feel good about the vintage Omega 18kt gold watch and bracelet combi's in my collection....I mean $31K for 9kt...c'mon!
I had the exact same thought seeing my Conquest Deluxe and its 18k bracelet sitting pretty in its box. That much money for a 9k staib mesh is borderline insulting.
 
Posts
654
Likes
1,028
Omega's gone completely nuts.
31.000€ for a 9k gold Seamaster, with an anti ergonomic mesh bracelet, resembling my Tudor BB burgundy.
 
Posts
2,875
Likes
5,356
Omega's gone completely nuts.
31.000€ for a 9k gold Seamaster, with an anti ergonomic mesh bracelet, resembling my Tudor BB burgundy.

All true. And it's likely going to work, and I think a lot of people are going to say it looks way better than the burgundy tudor.
 
Posts
217
Likes
480
I love it and have done since seeing the first pictures but at those prices? Dear god no. I shall be waiting for someone else to take the hit and seeing what it does on the second hand market.
 
Posts
1,147
Likes
6,705
Hm,

I don’t know why, but this Seamaster reminds me on …

_20230214_095329-jpg.1556586

BR
Hans
 
Posts
2,875
Likes
5,356
Feel like I’ve seen the design inspiration before …


Not sure I see it, other than the similarities that already exist between these two divers.
 
Posts
2,875
Likes
5,356
With a little bit of
Agreed. it's hard not to see this as a direct shot at Tudor. Almost like a, "you should have carried the gilt all the way through, here's how it's done" shot.
 
Posts
54
Likes
179
More importantly, Omega finally came out with a bronze gold deployant clasp so the other bronze gold Seamaster can finally get a folding clasp instead of the pin buckle.
I think the deployant clasp is integral to the bracelet like the other Omega milanese. The bracelet fits 20mm lug width, so it won’t work for the Seamaster 300 Heritage. Not that I would have paid the 15k+ they will ask for it…

It looks like the rubber strap version comes with the 18mm-width Seamaster style pin buckle, which is a nice addition to complete the bronze gold look instead of the sort of mismatched 16mm buckle that the 300 Heritage comes with.
 
Posts
308
Likes
263
On a more serious note- does anyone see the direction Omega is taking the SMP platform, as similar to how Rolex utilizes the Sub platform? Essentially every Rolex is a sub. It seems like Omega is branching the SMP line in a way that keeps the most key design elements- lyre lugs, scalloped bezel, skeleton hands, hour markers- and then allowing the dial to play. Texture, color, waves/wave type- and dials honestly are a strength of Omega's.

If so... it's honestly a good move. the green-bronze-titanium, this burgundy-bronze, and the new old-wave no-date, are all lookers and still absolutely unmistakably SMP300s. I could see this working really well for Omega, assuming there's intention behind it.
The confusing portion is that what if the NTTD sea-master redesign is the new phase, will the branch eventually merge into a new SMP, or will it continue to focus on both for the time being. One figured the NTTD was a unique variation, then came the bond 60th, green with bronze gold, titanium, the black/silver Bond 60th waved variants and these ones.

What’s omega endgame here and I’m wondering what’s their goal for future of the SMP.

Like you mentioned a Sub will always be a sub, but this SMP300 wave of different watches makes it confusing on what to expect tbh.
 
Posts
2,875
Likes
5,356
The confusing portion is that what if the NTTD sea-master redesign is the new phase, will the branch eventually merge into a new SMP, or will it continue to focus on both for the time being. One figured the NTTD was a unique variation, then came the bond 60th, green with bronze gold, titanium, the black/silver Bond 60th waved variants and these ones.

What’s omega endgame here and I’m wondering what’s their goal for future of the SMP.

Like you mentioned a Sub will always be a sub, but this SMP300 wave of different watches makes it confusing on what to expect tbh.

What I mean is, when you look at Rolex's catalog, a huge number of their watches ultimately are "all submariners." The Yachtmaster, Explorer II, GMTs, and sub variants all share the exact same dial, markers, and hands- variations in the color and texture of the bezel are some of the biggest differences but the essential design language all flowed from the submariner. No matter which of these you choose, they are unmistakeably a Rolex at just a glance to any observer, which cements the branding. I'm not saying (for the record) that this is at all a bad thing.

All of the current Seamaster pros share the most important design features- the markers, skeletonized hands, scalloped bezel, and lyre-lug case. The variations in color and dial texture make them playful variations but the branding is unmistakable. I'm essentially suggesting- that, like Rolex offering *fifteen different variations of the GMT via different colored bezels but maintaining the same design language, Omega seems to be doing something similar with the current expansion in the SMP line. Omega can offer a flat dial, a tight wave or long wave; and at this point each will still share enough design elements that have been used previously that it doesn't seem out of place.