raclaims
·Great pix...the 321 never disappoints any time I put it on the wrist...it's an incredible piece.
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
I think it’s the same size. I actually find it more legible given there’s less clutter due to writing and longer hour markers etc. The sub dials are the same and reasonably legible for me. Better than the other chrono watches I’ve owned for sure
Random question but what is the face size compared to a standard Moonwatch 1861 Hessalite? I don’t have the best eyesight and wondered on the sizing of the face and subdials. Any comments on general visibility in comparison would also be great. Thanks.
While I can't guarantee that Omega didn't update their dials in the past decades, it's rather unlikely.
In terms of the Calibre 321 "Ed White", Omega went out of their way to recreate the 321 1-1 with the original, so I sincerely doubt they would've varied in terms of case or dial size...
Therefore, according to the most awesome "Moonwatch Only" authors, both the 321 & 861 (/1861) dials measure exactly 31.20 mm. They got their info straight from the horse's mouth - Jean Singer & Cie SA, the company that made* the dials way back when 👍
*I assume Omega makes them "in-house" now... 🤔 If anyone knows for sure, please let us know 😀
When designing the Speedmaster Professional, Omega decided to "beef up" the case from the original 38.2mm to 42mm, just slightly larger than the bezel, if we don't take the asymmetrical (crown-guard) side into account. The black* bezel diameter is actually identical for both the Speedmaster & Speedmaster Professional at 39.7mm!
*The steel bezels were ~1mm smaller at 38.6mm.
39.7mm bezel over the 42mm case...
![]()
39.7mm bezel over the 38.2mm case...
![]()