Breaking News: The New Steel Speedmaster With Caliber 321 “Ed White”

Posts
4
Likes
31
Reached out to the Omega Boutique in my city. I was previously on the waitlist at a Tourbillion boutique. That permanently shut down. I wasn't sure of my status and wondered if the list had transferred over to the OB. Answer: no.

And the OB informed me that the waitlist is "closed." I own a couple of Omegas and have an existing relationship with this boutique, but I think I'm small fry 😀

I also called an OB in another State, and they said they could get me any Omega within a week except the 321 SS, Snoopy, or platinum 321. The guy on the phone was friendly. He basically said they don't have a waitlist and the only way to get one is to be "offered" one. So, this supports the VIP argument.
 
Posts
3,979
Likes
8,998
I wonder if they’re making a lot fewer than originally anticipated.
 
Posts
5,307
Likes
18,406
I wonder if they’re making a lot fewer than originally anticipated.

Regardless of whether their best laid plans went astray or if they planned on minimum production,
I don't understand why Omega (or any manufacturer) would advertise a product for sale but not have anything available.

I can understand that the Snoopy was much more popular than they anticipated and they are making them as fast as they can. But if it is true that an OB gets one or two Ed Whites per year and that they are only available for the "best" customers, how can this be put into a good light? Is this what it means to be a luxury brand?

For some reason I don't mind A. Lange or Patek selling a watch for 80K. I still can't get it because I can't afford it, but I know that if I wanted to buy it they'd sell it to me. Or if they limited them to 2000 and just sold out. Maybe it's similar, but it feels more insulting when a watch is advertised for 14K and I walk in with my 14K and they say "sorry, not for you."

Perhaps there are just too many watch buyers worldwide for Omega to support. Loved to death.

(Seems a bit petty to be complaining about not being able to buy a watch. This has not escaped me.)
 
Posts
209
Likes
216
What are you smoking? You can’t buy any Patek sport model at retail. They got multi-year waiting lists for Nautilus and you need to be known customer. The situation with Patek is way way worse than Omega.
 
Posts
489
Likes
2,018
Snoopy..... Ed Whites .....?
complaining about not being able to buy .......)

yes i wanted both of those, not available to me per OB for whatever reason

those are good watches, but the story is just loosely related to space history of their ancestors in space, not the exact specs

no big deal to me if not available (yet). there are plenty of (horologically) interesting watches out there to buy which are not marketed with big story telling
Edited:
 
Posts
489
Likes
2,018
What are you smoking? You can’t buy any Patek sport model at retail. They got multi-year waiting lists for Nautilus and you need to be known customer. The situation with Patek is way way worse than Omega.
how about royal oaks
 
Posts
5,307
Likes
18,406
What are you smoking? You can’t buy any Patek sport model at retail. They got multi-year waiting lists for Nautilus and you need to be known customer. The situation with Patek is way way worse than Omega.

Point taken. Maybe it just comes down to too much demand.
 
Posts
2,462
Likes
2,594
how about royal oaks
You can’t buy any AP’s right now except for maybe some women’s models.
 
Posts
3,979
Likes
8,998
Point taken. Maybe it just comes down to too much demand.

The reality is, mechanical watches are not needed for anything whatsoever. Their very existence - every one - is a game of desires.

that the apex of this game results in seeming distortions shouldn’t be too surprising.

And as it turns out, to survive, watch cos have figured out they need demand to outstrip supply (or else secondary market sales below MSRP tank demand, they end up with stranded product, and their image - which is their only true product - is negatively effected), which achieving demand outstripping supply (seemingly paradoxically) further increases demand.

Not to suggest I have it all figured out, but instead only that I see the most successful brands all doing it or TRYING to do it and assume THEY have something figured out.
 
Posts
1,316
Likes
2,461
The reality is, mechanical watches are not needed for anything whatsoever. Their very existence - every one - is a game of desires.

that the apex of this game results in seeming distortions shouldn’t be too surprising.

And as it turns out, to survive, watch cos have figured out they need demand to outstrip supply (or else secondary market sales below MSRP tank demand, they end up with stranded product, and their image - which is their only true product - is negatively effected), which achieving demand outstripping supply (seemingly paradoxically) further increases demand.

Not to suggest I have it all figured out, but instead only that I see the most successful brands all doing it or TRYING to do it and assume THEY have something figured out.
#macroeconomics

One of my favorite courses in college
 
Posts
27,944
Likes
71,193
The reality is, mechanical watches are not needed for anything whatsoever. Their very existence - every one - is a game of desires.

that the apex of this game results in seeming distortions shouldn’t be too surprising.

And as it turns out, to survive, watch cos have figured out they need demand to outstrip supply (or else secondary market sales below MSRP tank demand, they end up with stranded product, and their image - which is their only true product - is negatively effected), which achieving demand outstripping supply (seemingly paradoxically) further increases demand.

Not to suggest I have it all figured out, but instead only that I see the most successful brands all doing it or TRYING to do it and assume THEY have something figured out.

The vast majority of watch companies are not doing this, and are still surviving (and more) just fine. In fact, Omega is one of them, so although there are some models that are harder to get due to lower production volumes, most Omegas can simply be bought whenever you want to buy them.
 
Posts
30,837
Likes
36,276
The vast majority of watch companies are not doing this, and are still surviving (and more) just fine. In fact, Omega is one of them, so although there are some models that are harder to get due to lower production volumes, most Omegas can simply be bought whenever you want to buy them.
I hope it stays that way too and we see more numbered editions for LEs instead of limited editions just to take the heat out of speculation and get watches on wrists instead of in vaults.
 
Posts
3,979
Likes
8,998
The vast majority of watch companies are not doing this, and are still surviving (and more) just fine. In fact, Omega is one of them, so although there are some models that are harder to get due to lower production volumes, most Omegas can simply be bought whenever you want to buy them.

I was suggesting Omega might be viewed as being in the above-mentioned *trying* do it bucket. That increasingly seems plausible. Whether the current trajectory sticks or goes as far as Rolex remains to be seen, of course.

But if you were being generous (rather than contrarian) to my point I think you’d have to agree that it’s past due to still in 2021 feel like like “I don't understand why Omega (or any manufacturer) would advertise a product for sale but not have anything available” - the point to which I was responding
 
Posts
27,944
Likes
71,193
I was suggesting Omega might be viewed as being in the above-mentioned *trying* do it bucket. That increasingly seems plausible. Whether the current trajectory sticks or goes as far as Rolex remains to be seen, of course.

But if you were being generous (rather than contrarian) to my point I think you’d have to agree that it’s past due to still in 2021 feel like like “I don't understand why Omega (or any manufacturer) would advertise a product for sale but not have anything available” - the point to which I was responding

But I don't really agree that they are trying to do what you are suggesting is "needed for survival" of these brands. They do not need demand to outstrip supply as you have suggested. This entire FOMO way of looking at watches is relatively new, and IMO won't last. It will eventually go out of fashion, and the instagrammers will move onto the something else to "flex" with. This sort of hype has a way of burning itself out after a time.

The two watches that are hard to get from Omega (Snoopy and 321) were known to be limited production watches from the beginning, so to say this is some sort of trend for the entire brand is IMO making way too much of it when most Omegas can simply be bought when you walk into the dealer, without any wait lists or other drama.
 
Posts
3,979
Likes
8,998
But I don't really agree that they are trying to do what you are suggesting is "needed for survival" of these brands. They do not need demand to outstrip supply as you have suggested. This entire FOMO way of looking at watches is relatively new, and IMO won't last.

That’s a fine view, and may prove to be right.

But I don’t share the view, neither do professional analysts of the sector, and neither does it square with the observed manufactures’ moves in this direction or those losing their asses (which suggest it’s not merely a whim or mistake but instead intentional and responsive to a business need).

Luxury Watches Are Badly Set for Investors - WSJ (basically, describing how private brands with waitlists are faring well, while public companies with a glut of product are doing poorly)

Rolex Accounts For One Quarter of Entire Swiss Watch Industry’s Annual Turnover (Essentially same message as above, while also emphasizing just how successful Rolex’s exclusivity moves have been to its bottom line and market capture)

The Deloitte Swiss Watch Industry Study 2020



Morgan Stanley (2018): DTC and the Bullwhip Effect -A bumpy transition ahead for Swiss watch industry. (In effect, showing that stranded inventory has an exponential downward effect on company inventory and health, while companies with waitlists do well - so others like Omega will need to move to DTC sales and/or narrow product lines with reduced availability.)

Hermes Says Luxury Watch Oversupply an ‘Illness’ for Industry


Swiss Watches Amid the Crisis - NYT (2020)


Wristwatches Industry Report 2020/2021 - Strategio Institute



The Big Four Increase Their Worldwide Grip on Watches - NYT 2021

And therein lies the No. 1 explanation for the brands’ extreme desirability, industry experts say: Demand for their watches far outstrips supply — despite the four companies’ vastly different annual production figures.”

 
Posts
27,944
Likes
71,193
That’s a fine view, and may prove to be right.

But I don’t share the view, neither do professional analysts of the sector, and neither does it square with the observed manufactures’ moves in this direction or those losing their asses (which suggest it’s not merely a whim or mistake but instead intentional and responsive to a business need).

So is this admitting now that the scarcity of Rolex is something they are purposefully engineering? Because my impression all along is that you have resisted this idea.

And just to address the straw men - no one is suggesting that it's a good idea to have a "glut" of products, but as I'm sure you know, there's a spot between "glut" and "empty shelves" that exists.

As for companies "losing their asses", well the Swatch group mid-year report would seem to contradict that narrative...

Swatch Group Half-Year Report 2021
 
Posts
3,979
Likes
8,998
So is this admitting now that the scarcity of Rolex is something they are purposefully engineering? Because my impression all along is that you have resisted this idea.

And just to address the straw men - no one is suggesting that it's a good idea to have a "glut" of products, but as I'm sure you know, there's a spot between "glut" and "empty shelves" that exists.

As for companies "losing their asses", well the Swatch group mid-year report would seem to contradict that narrative...

Swatch Group Half-Year Report 2021


Typical Archer dialogue of:

Me: it seems apples are often red

You: no, oranges are always orange


but if you want to talk oranges:

So is this admitting now that the scarcity of Rolex is something they are purposefully engineering? Because my impression all along is that you have resisted this idea.

I suppose you could dig up some one-off post of haste that suggests otherwise, but no, in the main my thoughts in this subject have been consistently: throttling production is different from matching production to a desired demand ratio, doing so is not “evil” (least of all if it makes business sense), and disagreeing with the various versions of “if you make more watches you’ll make more money” claptrap


And just to address the straw men - no one is suggesting that it's a good idea to have a "glut" of products, but as I'm sure you know, there's a spot between "glut" and "empty shelves" that exists.

Funny you call it a strawman, as it’s a strawman you’re here creating. I did nowhere suggest that you think a glut is a good idea

instead, I was supporting my assertion that the Swiss watch industry is uniquely negatively affected by any oversupply or stale inventory (see bullwhip analysis), and simultaneously uniquely positively affected by demand outstripping supply (see analysis variously above on this both curing the overstock problems, but also adding benefits to both obtaining and incrementally raising MSRP)


As for companies "losing their asses", well the Swatch group mid-year report would seem to contradict that narrative...

Two things:

First, exceptions don’t make rules

Second, Swatch group doesn’t even need to be an exception: over the past few years analysista have noted the company (1) narrowing its portfolio of offerings, (2) focusing on “heritage” piece marketing, (3) moving the company to DTC platform (in partial effort to address supply chain/inventory ails), and (4) having some successes at introducing high-demand/low availability marketing-leading pieces, in an apparent shift toward incorporating this brand strategy (as a compliment to DTC)

… which was basically my original point RE we shouldn’t be surprised to see Swiss watch manufactures having pieces that are very hard to get
 
Posts
6,788
Likes
21,970
Great discussion.

One topic that often gets overlooked is what happens when demand exceeds supply, and then the consumer fatigues from the wait, and looks elsewhere?

I had a new cal 321 Speedy on order, but after a year of waiting, despite the fact that I still like it, I decided to get something else. Am I the exception? Will most wait? Perhaps. I guess the above suggests that to be the case.
 
Posts
27,944
Likes
71,193
I suppose you could dig up some one-off post of haste that suggests otherwise, but no, in the main my thoughts in this subject have been consistently: throttling production is different from matching production to a desired demand ratio, doing so is not “evil” (least of all if it makes business sense), and disagreeing with the various versions of “if you make more watches you’ll make more money” claptrap

Thanks. As I said it was my impression that you didn't agree that this was intentional but all just "demand", but it's been a long time since those conversation happened, and I'm not interested in going back to look. If my question somehow offended you, I apologize. I was just under a different impression so appreciate the clarifications.

Funny you call it a strawman, as it’s a strawman you’re here creating. I did nowhere suggest that you think a glut is a good idea

instead, I was supporting my assertion that the Swiss watch industry is uniquely negatively affected by any oversupply or stale inventory (see bullwhip analysis), and simultaneously uniquely positively affected by demand outstripping supply (see analysis variously above on this both curing the overstock problems, but also adding benefits to both obtaining and incrementally raising MSRP)

The "glut" term is in the material you provided. You again here argue that this is your position, which seems to indicate to me you think I am of the opposite opinion. I don't think anyone would want a glut, so if you were just stating the obvious, then that's okay too - no harm done.

First, exceptions don’t make rules

Second, Swatch group doesn’t even need to be an exception: over the past few years analysista have noted the company (1) narrowing its portfolio of offerings, (2) focusing on “heritage” piece marketing, (3) moving the company to DTC platform (in partial effort to address supply chain/inventory ails), and (4) having some successes at introducing high-demand/low availability marketing-leading pieces, in an apparent shift toward incorporating this brand strategy (as a compliment to DTC)

… which was basically my original point RE we shouldn’t be surprised to see Swiss watch manufactures having pieces that are very hard to get

So this seems to suggest that they don't need to do this broadly (across the entire or even a part of their product range) to be successful, if I'm reading your points correctly. And that is my point, that this isn't "necessary to survive" as was originally stated.
 
Posts
27,944
Likes
71,193
Great discussion.

One topic that often gets overlooked is what happens when demand exceeds supply, and then the consumer fatigues from the wait, and looks elsewhere?

I had a new cal 321 Speedy on order, but after a year of waiting, despite the fact that I still like it, I decided to get something else. Am I the exception? Will most wait? Perhaps. I guess the above suggests that to be the case.

I think it is a real risk with brands pursuing this strategy.