Forums Latest Members

BREAKING NEWS - 50th Anniversary Apollo 11 in Steel Revealed

  1. taz101 May 17, 2019

    Posts
    1,082
    Likes
    625
    [​IMG]

    Have to say I LOVE the strap that comes with it i'm normally a metal fan but this just somehow suits it so well. The worn thing works amazingly.
     
    Travelller, Eve and mancio like this.
  2. Tristanp May 17, 2019

    Posts
    238
    Likes
    2,000
  3. To the moon May 17, 2019

    Posts
    356
    Likes
    450
    Oh well.... Not all of us move with the times. I don't just collect pieces I love or even like. But, whether they are relevant to my collection or significant, and you've guessed it :thumbsup:
     
    jankymutt and BenjaminT like this.
  4. Archer Omega Qualified Watchmaker May 17, 2019

    Posts
    26,464
    Likes
    65,607
    I lived through the 80's once, so I don't need to go back to when TT was popular thanks. I love the music of that era, but the fashion was flashy/gaudy/over the top, and IMO shouldn't be repeated...unless of course that's your thing. You be you, man...

    I don't buy something I don't like just to make sure I have one for the sake of having one of everything.
     
    hkrauss, Longbow, Pun and 4 others like this.
  5. rainking May 17, 2019

    Posts
    368
    Likes
    445
    That's all I can see, that bracelet. Sure wish we could get it for the standard Pro. Dang.
     
    timestamp likes this.
  6. padders Oooo subtitles! May 17, 2019

    Posts
    8,993
    Likes
    13,941
    Yes great if you like your stuff pre-fucked...
     
  7. blubarb May 17, 2019

    Posts
    3,594
    Likes
    8,112
    Well, I’m not convinced about this anniversary Speedmaster, but not too bad as far as a riff on the same theme goes. The price point is too high imho and I’m equally not convinced about the Co-axial driving it - Omega could have easily pressed their 321 into this to make it more representative as to Aldrin’s ST 105.012 . The so called Moongold ™ doesn’t do a thing for me. Will the front graphic be a pixilated transfer like the many other omega sundial transfers? And the gold print, for whatever reason, makes the A in omega jump out like a pop tart on the dial. I really don’t know what to think on this...I don’t mind the case back though. LE of 6969 - really? Why not 1969?
     
    Edited May 17, 2019
  8. blubarb May 17, 2019

    Posts
    3,594
    Likes
    8,112
    ::rimshot::ROTFL
     
  9. blubarb May 17, 2019

    Posts
    3,594
    Likes
    8,112
    And by the look of it, the E isn’t centred under the middle of the applied logo

    DDA9E58C-4919-40DF-B39F-E2044FD6A702.jpeg

    5E34CE47-6325-4703-AA81-4DC1487152F3.jpeg
     
    rohnin likes this.
  10. jankymutt May 17, 2019

    Posts
    169
    Likes
    172
    Hopefully, that is just the angle of the photo. Otherwise, that is some poor quality control!
     
  11. blubarb May 17, 2019

    Posts
    3,594
    Likes
    8,112
    I think that’s pretty much front on

    8C54C6FD-251F-4146-9419-209294143DE5.jpeg
     
    jankymutt likes this.
  12. CPRwatch May 17, 2019

    Posts
    4,250
    Likes
    58,178
    I'm normally at the front of the queue of the doom mongers when it comes to LE editions of any watch , but this really is a special LE given that it's a 50th & how many of us can really say I will be here for the 100th . So take a breath , think about it & get one while you can with its minor imperfections . And who or what, has ever been the perfect finished item . I literally ran to my local AD when I saw what a great watch it is , just hoping I can pick one up . More power to omega on such a lovely watch & tribute to those brave men that went into the previously unknown .
     
  13. blokk May 17, 2019

    Posts
    268
    Likes
    139
    rainking likes this.
  14. Skier May 17, 2019

    Posts
    53
    Likes
    136
    There are too many aspects of this release that I don't like to consider visiting my local AD to order:

    - The two tone stepped dial. It may be the way the light reflects off the dial but the main part of the dial looks a dark grey, the stepped outer looks black.
    - The 9 o'clock sub-dial image lacks elegance. Obviously it's a significant image but IMHO lacks subtlety and class.
    - The asymmetry of the 'OMEGA' font. The misalignment of the 'E' under the logo was the second thing I noticed when I first saw it. The seemingly large 'A' I hadn't noticed but have now and, I agree, it looks odd.

    The bracelet, caseback etc. look beautiful and I'd be happy with the co-axial movement and even happier if it was an automatic. Heresy for some, I know.
     
  15. chum_2000_uk May 17, 2019

    Posts
    127
    Likes
    355
    Wow... They are really milking this moon landing thing aren't they...
     
    boraxman likes this.
  16. Archer Omega Qualified Watchmaker May 17, 2019

    Posts
    26,464
    Likes
    65,607
    [​IMG]

    ;)
     
    Nathan1967 likes this.
  17. tyrantlizardrex May 17, 2019

    Posts
    8,881
    Likes
    27,410
    Why on earth would you spend money on something you don't like? ::facepalm1::

    Utter nonsense.
     
    STANDY, Cad290, Pepe Lucas and 2 others like this.
  18. blubarb May 17, 2019

    Posts
    3,594
    Likes
    8,112
  19. ewand May 17, 2019

    Posts
    1,291
    Likes
    5,855
    From a 105.012 ...
    upload_2019-5-17_12-58-17.png
     
  20. stevec14 May 17, 2019

    Posts
    2,802
    Likes
    11,629
    I have a deposit and am first with a very trusted AD. It looks great to me. I don’t like two tone particularly but this does not look like that. I think it looks great and am looking fwd to seeing in the metal. My wife hates gold, but likes this. Go figure.

    We will see. But I’d rather have this than a tacky two tone Rolex. (My opinion only, no responses required)
     
    Omega-Q likes this.