Nobel Prize
·I like it better than its counterpart. Would love to see on the wrist as these tend to look better on pics to me than on my wrist ( personal taste, not the watch) but for what it’s worth it’s quite a nice looking piece
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
I would say the gold aspect is so minimal that it's hardly going to be a deal breaker for me.But, Omega obviously don't see it at being that minimal as they are charging around £3000 for it! 😉
Yes, you're probably right
Not to mention the ceramic bezel, sapphire crystal and caseback and revised bracelet.
When you break it down, the price increase is understandable albeit it does become quite an expensive piece....
But... When you do break it down, 6969 x £3000 = unrealistic and unjustifiable price increase, and taking advantage of an anniversary
IMO
But... When you do break it down, 6969 x £3000 = unrealistic and unjustifiable price increase, and taking advantage of an anniversary
IMO
Well, Not if the sum of the different bits makes up the difference, so I think it’s probably justified. Compared to an ultraman it’s fantastic value.
Whether it’s unrealistic - I suspect they’ll sell so make of that what you will.
The commander sold as well did the Apollo 17 40th....
The commander sold as well did the Apollo 17 40th....
The Commander sold well? Not round my way it didn't. It stuck around like a stale fart for quite some time in dealer windows.
Only the fact that you point out that it's a deciding factor of its success as to whether the piece sells or not. I'm just saying that many pieces sell but probably not the best of pieces, nor of quality of design
You said 'The commander sold as well did the Apollo 17 40th....' which is ambiguous to say the least (did you miss a clause?) so yes lets agree to not spit hairs but my opinion is given freely. As it happens I agree with your point that the Apollo 50th is a tad overpriced for what it is and may not sell quite as hot-cake-like as some of our more speculative minded members would have us believe.
It’s one factor for sure because this is a high profile release so you’d like to think they price where they think they would be able to sell. Personally, I think the price increase is just about ok based on movement and materials albeit it does push the Moonwatch into new territory which will be offputting to some. I suspect a Moonwatch will be 5.5k or thereabouts once the movement is rolled out so that might be a better comparison.
I take the point re the pieces you mention, but those are still languishing in AD’s and OB’s. I suspect these will be snapped up quicker, if only for the social media effect these days.
But it’s up to the individual as to whether they vote with their wallet or not.
The fact of the matter is that a 50th anniversary edition has a greater intangible asset value and that is how Omega is justifiable in the price over the mere change physical materials from the previous version. Go walk into a OB or AD tomorrow and see if you can get someone to take your money. Well an AD might....but I have been told by my AD they were promised a number which they presold and that Omega has come back and told them they will be getting less. Now they have to tell a few people they won’t be getting the watch.... The price is clearly what the market will bear.