Black dial Constellation 2782

Posts

723

Likes

1,271

Mods

·May 2, 2021

Thoughts on the originality of this black dial Connie?

Initially it looked good to me, but the more I look the more I believe it could be a redial.

Should the M be sloping on dome dials and the straight M seen here used on pie pan dials?
Shouldn’t the printed hour markers be dots?
Printing a bit too thick?

 

Posts

96

Likes

116

DorsetOmega

·May 2, 2021

I’ve been looking at that one too! The vertical cross hair seemed slightly out for MOY but I wondered if it was the angle of the picture.

 

Posts

96

Likes

116

DorsetOmega

·May 2, 2021

Plus, shouldn’t the “i” be dotted on “constellation”?

 

Posts

365

Likes

452

Maskelyne

·May 2, 2021

- Well, here is a picture of another 2782-(9)...

 

Posts

7,518

Likes

34,565

cristos71

·May 2, 2021

Redial IMHO

 

Posts

12,717

Likes

17,193

gatorcpa

·May 2, 2021·ΩF InvestiGator

“ChronometER” is wrong for this case reference. There are other issues with the dial.

Redial. 🙁
gatorcpa

 

Posts

101

Likes

453

Mr Vo

·May 2, 2021

The "n" in Constellation does not seem correct IMHO

 

Posts

6,617

Likes

11,369

MSNWatch

·May 2, 2021·Vintage Omega Aficionado

Clear redial. For starters ER and the 5 minute marks are wrong.

 

Posts

375

Likes

2,886

omegawatchlover

·May 3, 2021

Man that would've been a nice Connie! Look at how far the minute track is from the markers, that stood out to me. Also I agree with what the others said: missing i in Constellation, should be chronometre not chronometer. Btw the crown is aftermarket too.

 

B

Posts

145

Likes

1,267

bbozic

·May 3, 2021

This is a bumper Constellation dial, those will have dots next to the arrow heads instead of dash markers.