Anyone snag this linen dial Constellation?

Posts
13,201
Likes
22,953
I had this in my watch list this week but unfortunately my bid wasn’t enough to take it home.
Nevertheless, I though this was a beautiful watch, even with the clumsy engraving on the rear and once cleaned and serviced it should be a stunner.

I’m no Constellation expert but I assume it’s a 2652? Did anyone here win it?

 
Posts
2,251
Likes
15,687
The case definitely looks like a 2652 but the dial dont belong to the case, this is a later style of dial.
ChronometER is also a later writing of the correct chronometRE on 2652’s
 
Posts
13,201
Likes
22,953
The case definitely looks like a 2652 but the dial dont belong to the case, this is a later style of dial.
ChronometER is also a later writing of the correct chronometRE on 2652’s
I did notice that and it’s one of the things that stopped me going nuclear with my bid. The main reason being that I’m not experienced enough with the minutiae of Connie’s to know some of these details.
 
Posts
1,567
Likes
2,677
I was thinking it might be a 2887. The thick bevel on the edge of the caseback and the dial text are in line with that, IMO.
 
Posts
3,742
Likes
6,360
For the same reasons as pointed out by @hejsam or anything else?
It looks like a 2887 case with wrong dial. Dial may not have feet and repainted, I guess.
 
Posts
13,201
Likes
22,953
I was thinking it might be a 2887. The thick bevel on the edge of the caseback and the dial text are in line with that, IMO.

interesting. I hadn’t considered that (again, I’m not up on the finer details of the various Connie references).
Am I right in saying the 2887 can be found with both RE and ER spellings?
 
Posts
3,402
Likes
13,196
It’s indeed a 2887. What did it go for, in case you know?
A very small number of 50s Connies have appeared with those later linen dials. Our own @MSNWatch owns one if I’m not mistaken, not sure if it’s a 2887 though.
 
Posts
13,201
Likes
22,953
Sold for £1045 GBP. I bid up to £850 held back by my lack of expertise with Connie’s.
 
Posts
101
Likes
56
I bid up to 890. I thought MTV is right. It looks like 2887 or 14396(but does not looks like 37mm).
 
Posts
6,667
Likes
11,570
IMO it’s a 2887 with the correct dial. Would have gone for it if I was aware of the auction.
 
Posts
896
Likes
1,642
"Consteliation"??? I guess it lost some ink on the second "l"
 
Posts
6,667
Likes
11,570
"Consteliation"??? I guess it lost some ink on the second "l"
Crystal scratch.
 
Posts
1,282
Likes
5,716
IMO it’s a 2887 with the correct dial. Would have gone for it if I was aware of the auction.
I was aware of it but lacked the knowledge 😢. It appears that Omega started to experiment with dial features on that ref. that are more commonly seen in the 60s.
 
Posts
6,667
Likes
11,570
Have discussed this with @MtV and this may be the earliest reference that omega used the linen dial in.
 
Posts
13,201
Likes
22,953
ha, of dear, seems this may have been one that got away and I should have been bolder.
 
Posts
1
Likes
1
For clarification on this linen dial. It is in fact a 2887-1. Correct dial. I have the exact same piece. All correct. 👍
 
Posts
9,737
Likes
54,451
In addition to the other issues, I wouldn't be happy with the condition of the medallion. Three of the smaller stars at the top are very faint and there are two stars on the right lower that I can't see at all.