Forums Latest Members
  1. Geo! Jun 21, 2015

    Posts
    514
    Likes
    560
    Regarding the Bo'ness hill climb, was that the year that this flew over?

    image.jpg
     
    Thrasher36 likes this.
  2. Alpha Kilt Owner, Beagle Parent, Omega Collector Jun 21, 2015

    Posts
    16,068
    Likes
    141,821
    Afraid not, I missed that one.
     
  3. chunkythebulldog Jun 21, 2015

    Posts
    1,635
    Likes
    13,190
    @pitpro don't want to turn this thread into a mine's bigger than yours (although it is ;)) so I'll stop being petty.
    If your M5 really can do 0-100mph in 3.2 seconds as stated let me know how much you want for it as I'll buy it off you and fly it back to England
     
    Hans the Wolf and i20rider like this.
  4. proximal Jun 23, 2015

    Posts
    287
    Likes
    455
  5. i20rider Jun 23, 2015

    Posts
    597
    Likes
    1,330
    Making 560 crank. So. 490ish wheel it would need a hella tire and or AWD . And it could probably do 0-100 "kph" in 3.2 but that's still pushing it
     
  6. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Jun 23, 2015

    Posts
    26,923
    Likes
    32,597
    They're actually not hard on tires at all, its surprisingly difficult to even break traction in the V10 M5/M6 unless you're trying as its not an engine that makes that much torque, last time I drove one of those V10s it was on 295 Michelin PSS rears and it felt like it was glued to the road, AWD would be pointless unless you were trying to go rallying in it.

    Its actually a slightly underwhelming car until you pass 4,000 and realise you're not even halfway to the rev limit, and even that isn't the real rev limit, BMW built the engine to rev to over 10,000 and make dramatically more power then detuned it to only ~500 to make it more customer and emissions friendly. What makes it quick is the massive amount of usable powerband and the immense speed that SMG3 box can shift into second (something I'm not good at, in the S5/S6 modes unless you can lift and get back on exactly in sync with the box it feels like you've been rear-ended by a large truck when it changes gear).

    Its a shame they never did an M6 CSL to show what the V10 was really capable of without the nanny state tuning, and now with turbos taking over we'll never get to see that sort of thing again.
     
    OMGRLX likes this.
  7. Tony C. Ωf Jury member Jun 23, 2015

    Posts
    7,381
    Likes
    24,178
    [​IMG]
     
  8. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Jun 23, 2015

    Posts
    26,923
    Likes
    32,597
    Indeed :thumbsup:

    IMG_0401.jpg
     
  9. pitpro Likes the game. Jun 23, 2015

    Posts
    3,073
    Likes
    3,552
    ' its surprisingly difficult to even break traction in the V10 M5/M6 unless you're trying'
    Trying is the operative.
    "M" button on, S6, Traction control off, "rubber" in first 3 gear changes on mine


    'What makes it quick is the massive amount of usable powerband and the immense speed that SMG3 box can shift into second'
    60 milliseconds, when it came out faster than Ferrari gearboxes (100ms)
    and it's actually a manual transmission with an automated computer controlled Real clutch as opposed to a torque converter fluid based automatic
    Really cool to hear it drop the revs slightly to shift.

    ' (something I'm not good at, in the S5/S6 modes unless you can lift and get back on exactly in sync with the box it feels like you've been rear-ended by a large truck when it changes gear).'
    You get used to it.
    That slam you feel is the 60ms shift in "M" mode , basically what us old U,S. gearheads
    call a "power shift" , as in minimal clutching, and it's a serious slam back in your seat.

    Its a shame they never did an M6 CSL to show what the V10 was really capable of without the nanny state tuning, and now with turbos taking over we'll never get to see that sort of thing again.
    The closest thing to this was the Dinan Stroker kit for $40,000
    Bumped the hp to 628hp (no turbo, no supercharger)
    And BMW would honor the factory warranty.
    Turbos are great but just not the same.
     
    TrboDieselPwrd and OMGRLX like this.
  10. i20rider Jun 23, 2015

    Posts
    597
    Likes
    1,330
    40k for a rotating assembly... holy hell And only make 628. I think a $500 nitrous kit on a 100 shot would be a better way to go . And to think my LQ4 long block was less than 1k. And I only have about 5k in it. And it will make 800+ on the right fuel
     
  11. pitpro Likes the game. Jun 23, 2015

    Posts
    3,073
    Likes
    3,552
    Bone stock 1/4 mi time for E60 M5 is 12.3 @117mph (no slouch)
    Here's a guy that did 10.57 @ 130.19mph with Nitrous Shot
    So if it's 507hp stock, what's that in Nitrous?
    I won't post the vid, I posted enough, but check it out
    http://www.dragtimes.com/2006-BMW-M5-Pictures-18103.html
     
    OMGRLX likes this.
  12. i20rider Jun 23, 2015

    Posts
    597
    Likes
    1,330
    10.50s @130 is moving. He is also AWD but as far as nitrous goes. It is gauged by HP. It depends on what he is jetted fo. 50 shot "around 50hp" 100 shot "100hp" and so on. There is no telling what shot he was running I'd figure at least a 150-200 shot
     
  13. pitpro Likes the game. Jun 23, 2015

    Posts
    3,073
    Likes
    3,552
    M5 is RWD only
    150 shot it said
     
    OMGRLX likes this.
  14. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Jun 23, 2015

    Posts
    26,923
    Likes
    32,597
    If they made the M5 AWD the torches and pitchforks would be out in front of the Munich office, its the same reason they'll never delete the 3-pedal manual options, the customer backlash would be vicious.

    They're copping enough flack for daring to release the FWD "Active Tourer" 2-Series with a BMW badge on it as it is.
     
  15. proximal Jun 23, 2015

    Posts
    287
    Likes
    455
    The next M5 will be AWD. Here are some photos of it testing: http://www.autoblog.com/2015/01/23/bmw-m5-awd-spy-shots/

    The E60 M5 was planned to be SMG only and I think it was sold that way in Europe. The US and some other regions got a manual option a couple years after launch, but I remember that it was a pretty hastily developed car. Despite all the complaining, I'd guess that more than 90% of them are sold with the automatic anyway.
     
  16. i20rider Jun 24, 2015

    Posts
    597
    Likes
    1,330
    My apologies fellas for being miss informed about the Ms only being RWD. I saw the AWD motorsports sticker on his back glass. And I assumed the Ms were like the xi line.
     
  17. pitpro Likes the game. Jun 24, 2015

    Posts
    3,073
    Likes
    3,552
    Thrasher36 and noelekal like this.
  18. Tony C. Ωf Jury member Jun 24, 2015

    Posts
    7,381
    Likes
    24,178
    Now what would make you say that? Oh, perhaps this…

    0–60mph: 1.63 seconds

    60–130mph: 2.91 seconds

    Yikes!
     
  19. chunkythebulldog Jun 24, 2015

    Posts
    1,635
    Likes
    13,190
    That's a beast. I've been in a GT-R Nismo which is the quickest car I've ever been in but that thing is bonkers fast.
     
  20. erpin9 Jun 26, 2015

    Posts
    1,088
    Likes
    2,990
    This is my very rare (only 2 made) 1963 Lotus Cortina Ogle allegedly owned by Sir Stirling Moss. The Ford Cortina GT modified by Ogle is a car designed by the Ogle Design Organisation for Stirling Moss, to fulfill his personal requirements for a four seater GT car. Stirling Moss specification required a balanced relationship between performance-comfort- economy - and a reasonable purchase price. It was important to him that his car should be based on a proven production car, for which service was freely available.



    Old picture of the Cortina
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Picture of the car when I found it.
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Picture of the car after full restoration. Won 1st in Class in my country's premier Concours D' Elegance.
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Thrasher36, Faz, jw0n and 14 others like this.