UncleBuck
··understands the decision making hierarchyWonderful, Dave!
May I ask the case material? Silver?
It's so bright, yet, I see no hallmarks.
May I ask the case material? Silver?
It's so bright, yet, I see no hallmarks.
Wonderful, Dave!
May I ask the case material? Silver?
It's so bright, yet, I see no hallmarks.
I'm sorry, inside caseback?
This just in yesterday , a circa 1926 Elgin pocket watch. 15 jewel grade 315 movement, one of apx 1M that were made during the 315’s reign.
I’m going to get his one serviced and enjoy wearing it 😀
I love those blue hands 😎
IMO no.
Not sure this fits 100%, but I’ll throw it in anyways cause I like it
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-02/mido-inspired-by-architecture-guggenheim-museum-watch?utm_content=pursuits&utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&cmpid==socialflow-twitter-pursuits
Interesting ?
Im not saying it isn’t nice. I just don’t think it qualifies as Art Deco to me. Just because something has stylized numbers doesn’t make it Deco but that has become a catch all phrase to describe things. As someone who has been collecting for 25 years I just get put out by that term. I’m in the minority of course and it’s my issue. The lamp above is more in keeping with that style.