Thanks, appreciate the feedback and the explanation. I was confused as to why no one wanted to point out the reasons the watch was fake, but it kinda makes sense. Though a faker would also put the hours and search this forum thoroughly to fool everyone.
So have you got anymore pictures of the case?
the midcase is surprisingly close. Usually the best tell is removing the bezel and looking at the number of holes for the click rubies.
the mid case is so close I want to see more pictures as it’s either genuine or a new fake case we haven’t seen before.
I’m confident the case is fake.
OP’s pic, which is the only one we have showing the case profile
And genuine 165.024 CB/HF
there are slight changes to the midcase over the course of production.
166.024
166.024 SP
166.024 SP2
166.024-67
166.024-67 SP2
I’m confident the case is fake.
OP’s pic, which is the only one we have showing the case profile
And genuine 165.024 CB/HF
But either way, I’d like to see more pictures as if its is fake, it’s clearly an improved version as it’s materially different and better than the fakes we’ve seen over the couple of years.
The scraching on the caseback looks deliberate, As if they had to scratch the shiny new look away with sandpaper.
Casebacks dont look like that by use, do they?
some image processing (for the finish of the flank)
Anyway , hard to judge the "curves"...
The scraching on the caseback looks deliberate, As if they had to scratch the shiny new look away with sandpaper.
Casebacks dont look like that by use, do they?
metoo, but speedmaster
