qazwsx1
·I did not found much information about this style of dial in this watch that without “seamaster” or “constellation”.
(also cannot find another ref.2735 with cal420 , using this same dial’s configuration)
However, thank you “cristos71” for sharing me this picture from Italian catalog in year 1956 that use same dial style with my watch (ref.2741)
My omega was ref. 2735, cal.420, serial number 15,30x,xxx (production year 1956), diameter 33.5mm
In my opinion:
Dial: Original interesting dial with circular ring dial (not exactly know how to call it?)
with patina and some imperfect spot on dial.
Minute marker: Original omission mark with uncommon hour markers.
Hands: correct hands and second (in my opinion but not sure — should the second hand longer than minute hand?)
Caseback: original
Crown: not sure (but probably later replacement)
Crystal: not original
About ref.2735, From my own search, https://www.omegawatches.com/watch-omega-other-omega-ck-2735 . In this picture only minute hands going longer than the minute track. (But second hand no longer than minute track?)
This another one from “sliceofftime_” look the same marker style with me. His watch use the same cal420, same ref2735 but different in crown, also different in dial’s style)
https://omegaforums.net/threads/black-seamaster-unique-hour-markers.25967/#post-288069
Also, I search in this forum and other websites about omega 2735.
https://omegaforums.net/threads/is-this-omega-cal-420-a-steal-or-a-bust.51665/
https://omegaforums.net/threads/dirt-or-patina-can-dial-be-saved-large-pics.26958/#post-299493
https://www.chrono24.co.uk/omega/2735--id12999426.htm#gref
http://cticorp.jp/?p=35512
What’s your opinion about this exact configuration?
Thank you for your help and kindness,
Teerapat
My wrist shot: