Annual water resistance test questions

Posts
682
Likes
653
The only time I've had water damage was with a Breitling Colt A17380 after I washed my hands with the crown unscrewed. Damage happened in 2019, watch was purchased used in 2016, and I think production for that model ended in 2010? Never serviced as far as I knew, so well overdue for a service.

For my resistance testing in general, I just ask for the watch I'm wearing to be tested whenever I visit the boutique for some other reason.

I dont swim with a watch on anyway, I'm more worried about accidentally smacking it into something.

And again, limited experience with this, but the Breitling I had to send in for service didnt require any additional cost beyond their standard full service cost. I assume with modern watches, you'd have to let it sit with moisture for a significant amount of time before you cause damage that requires repairs beyond a normal service. So even if I did neglect a watch for too long and some water got in, I'm not out any extra money or time compared to if I pre-emptively sent it in for service. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
 
Posts
886
Likes
470
Well 50m is 50m at Omega so this wouldn't hold me back jumping in the pool.

Fair enough.
I wonder how that sits with the OP and being concerned about the WR of a 150 m watch👎
 
Posts
1,608
Likes
2,346
I know this has been covered before, and I do understand that a watch rated for 150m is out of spec if it doesn’t pass a pressure test at 150m—but…

It’s not about passive waterproofness or how long the watch can be in a pool or something. The rating is about pressure—and I’m guessing very few on this forum have ever actually exposed their watches to =/> their pressure rating.

I’m pretty sure 50m (5atm) is above 70 psi. To put that into perspective, a good shower at home might be in the 40s. Even with the kinetic movements of a vigorous swim, I don’t know that most of us would expose our watches to anywhere near their pressure ratings.

All I’m suggesting is that if you’re just washing dishes and going for a casual swim, a watch that is well sealed enough to pass a 50m test is probably more than up to the challenge… no?
 
Posts
4,893
Likes
21,837
a watch that is well sealed enough to pass a 50m test is probably more than up to the challenge… no?
Yes, exactly what Omega states:

 
Posts
27,379
Likes
69,791
D Duckie
Great thread with some sound information😀

What we don't know is what pressure an Omega boutique will test a 150 m rated watch to if we walked in and dropped it off.
I am assuming it will be to 150 m and the testing method would be a dry test.
If someone could confirm that would be nice👍

Typical dry testing equipment tops out at 10 bar, so 100 m. But the test is in 2 stages. The first is a vacuum test, done at -0.7 bar. Since water pressure on a watch can sometimes aid in sealing it (with a smaller leak) the vacuum test is in my view, the more important one. It is basically letting you know that under no pressure at all, like with a splash for washing your hands or immersion in water of a few cm's, that the watch will not leak.

Once the vacuum test is completed, the watch is subjected to the pressure test at +10 bar.

This is for watches that are rated for at least 100 m. For watches rated to lower pressures, like the Speedmaster Pro, the vacuum and pressure tests use different numbers.

If you want to go above 100 m, then it's a whole different series of steps involved, using water under high pressures - this is a test where a failure means water gets in the case. I generally only do this type of test when doing a full service, and after replacing all the seals.