New watch always excites me. This time it is a Universal Geneve gilt dial with steel case. It has the old UG logo printed. My research tells me that this logo was used by UG sometime in 1937, which allows me to date this watch to somewhere in the 1930s. I have no expertise to open the case back, so there isn't any shot of the movement.
Anyway, here are the photos. I would be delighted if anyone has more to share about it.
Thanks.
I just saw this thread after someone told me about it, 5 pages within a few days huh. The watch in question is used to be my watch, and after having it in person, worn it, and then sold it to a really good mate of mine, I believe the dial is 100% original. The watch is dated back to 1938, and it is quite common for UG watches in that period to have the UG shield logo on the dial.
So recently I received another comment that the font used on the E of the GENEVE below the logo is not consistent and therefore redial.
I have been zooming in to all the available photos here on this page. While there are perfect examples, there are also some with difference in the E.
What do you guys think?
Some of those examples use the l'accent grave on the second "E" in GENEVE and some do not; some have a flat bottom V and some do not; most letters have serifs, but some are sans-serif. And this variation was just on one model
Thanks for taking the time to answer but (and not criticising P's watch but genuinely curious), are differing letters known on the same example? To my eye, that first E is different to the next two. Not just a missing or superfluous accent but a different font. The middle stroke is a different length.
Now, if it had been made in Birmingham I could understand it but this is a Swiss watch. The Swiss are, let's face it, pretty anal about details. I once knew a guy who was expelled from Switzerland for speeding ... and he'd been domiciled there for years. Are Universal Geneve the Brummie of the Swiss watch industry?
I do see the difference in the first E compared to the other 2. I agree with you on that point. But I have been screening through photos of other UG online and I too have spotted difference on the E. It’s watch making in the 1930s after all. I guess consistency wasn’t a main concern for the manufacturers then.
So this is known and accepted? That's great to hear but I think it just makes me even more wary about buying a UG. It seems prime territory for getting burned. Or, I invest in a copy of Sala and read it (as well as everything online) for a year before I looking at buying.
So this is known and accepted? That's great to hear but I think it just makes me even more wary about buying a UG. It seems prime territory for getting burned. Or, I invest in a copy of Sala and read it (as well as everything online) for a year before I looking at buying.