Advices on a 145.022-68

Posts
146
Likes
288
Hi guys,

I have been lurking around small ads and I came accross a 145.022-68 speedie. I just wanted some thoughts and help from experts there.

Everything looks good and original, except for the 861 movement, if I read the serial correctly it's supposed to be from 1971...

The seller is asking 4900$ open to discussion.

Thanks for your help !

Here are some pics :
 
Posts
1,560
Likes
4,419
It looks like a 30.5m serial number. It wouldn't be correct for a 68.
Maybe it would look more like a 69 who has had the caseback swapped? Bezel is a modern service part.
 
Posts
146
Likes
288
Can you teach me how you can say the dial and bezel are not correct for a 68 ?

I tried to identify the parts with the speedmaster101 website and it looks like I missed something.
 
Posts
495
Likes
1,042
The dial should have an applied metal Omega logo instead of a printed one.

The bezel should have the dot above the 90 and not next to it.
 
Posts
146
Likes
288
I made the mistakes because I had read that some 68 have the painted logo on the dial. Well thanks for the informations. As usual this forum is very helpful for novices like me looking for help.
 
Posts
481
Likes
711
The dial should have an applied metal Omega logo instead of a printed one.

The bezel should have the dot above the 90 and not next to it.

The indices are also longer on a 68.
 
Posts
5,859
Likes
16,770
Here are 2 145.022-68 examples. Either chrono center seconds hand is considered correct.
 
Posts
1,170
Likes
3,463
Here are 2 145.022-68 examples. Either chrono center seconds hand is considered correct.

Drop end chrono hand on a 145.022? Thought the 145.012's were the last to carry those?
 
Posts
5,859
Likes
16,770
Humm. 145.022-68 Drop chrono second hand is
Questionable in MWO 1st Edition.
Not correct in MWO 2nd Edition.

William says either is ok.
Edited:
 
Posts
2,048
Likes
10,662
Drop end chrono hand on a 145.022?

Indeed. My -68 single owner Transitional with drop end chromo hand. Lots of fine example out there.