- Posts
- 22
- Likes
- 14
Advice on a 168.010 please
- Posts
- 11,535
- Likes
- 20,198
Davidt
·It looks very polished and the dial looks tired and poor. I would pass unless it was absolutely dirt cheap, and then I'd still pass.
- Posts
- 22
- Likes
- 14
IAmZKWatches
·Thank you for your reply. It's currently listed for £600. Did not notice about the polishing but yes can see about the dial
- Posts
- 5,549
- Likes
- 8,598
Peemacgee
·It looks very polished and the dial looks tired and poor. I would pass unless it was absolutely dirt cheap, and then I'd still pass.
@Davidt is spot on here.
I'm particularly fond of this reference and the one you posted is a poor example.
(papers are a nice thing to have but don't make up for condition)
£600 would be a bargain if it were in good condition but not as it is.
The medallion has all but gone and the dial looks very tired (and it also has a replacement crown)
For reference, the lugs and bezel should have well defined chamfers like this.
- Posts
- 399
- Likes
- 348
nkhandekar
·It's very worn. I would pass. There should be a constellation over the observatory on the verso medallion, but you have an overcast sky.
- Posts
- 2,721
- Likes
- 11,998
Aroxx
·I believe that’s the worst medallion I’ve ever seen. All stars completely polished away…
- Posts
- 22
- Likes
- 14
IAmZKWatches
·Thank you everyone for your replies. I will pass on this one and hopefully find another one at another time.
