A little JLC Reverso help please? (2024 update)

Posts
16,780
Likes
47,518
I love the Reverso but have always felt that if you were going to get one, it would be best to get a Duo - it's the only one to me that ever lived up to the name, since who is ever going to turn it around to look at the back of the case? I'd much rather see a different watch face.

It Is reversed to a solid back to protect the crystal whilst playing polo

You gotta Mix in different circles man 馃槜馃槜 ( sarcasm )
 
Posts
2,510
Likes
3,729
It Is reversed to a solid back to protect the crystal whilst playing polo

You gotta Mix in different circles man 馃槜馃槜 ( sarcasm )

Oh, I know the reason... but if I'm gonna lay down the coin for a JLC, it's gonna be a Duo.
 
Posts
2,885
Likes
14,767
Hi Gang,
Since the JLC event in London a few weeks back, I've been looking at the Reverso line.

I own 2 Reversos - a TTR1931 (the 1st one you listed), and a Reverso Duo which has the same dimensions as the GT (26x42mm). These pics show how they wear on my 6.3" wrist.
359482-e0cb0074fc735a9243ec516925fd32af.jpg



The 1931 wears slightly large, but should be fine with a normal wrist (mine is skinny). The GT case wears nicely on mine, but may wear a tad small on normal wrists.

If budget allows, I'd go for the 1931.

But as you mentioned, if you're going for the GT case, I'd pick another model besides the 'Shadow', which has a certain vintage charm, but lacks some pizzazz with the dark dial which looks 'flat' . I'd go for a regular GT with white dial and guilloche instead.
 
Posts
158
Likes
891
I love the Reverso but have always felt that if you were going to get one, it would be best to get a Duo - it's the only one to me that ever lived up to the name, since who is ever going to turn it around to look at the back of the case? I'd much rather see a different watch face.
How about this one?
 
Posts
307
Likes
230
Tough choice. I personally have a 7.5 inch wrist, and while I am perfectly fine wearing a 34mm vintage piece, the GT case felt too small for me.
 
Posts
13,163
Likes
52,295
Well you guys just made me swap my cool "new" Polarouter for my Reverso. Overdue rotation.

 
Posts
34
Likes
131
I also joined the club, in fact, today. 馃榾

I love the CK2998LE, but for my boney 6" wrist, I'm finding it is a bit too chunky though I'm sure it is quite acceptable in today's standard. I just like slightly smaller and thinner watches considering my frame size. For that I'm planning to break it into two pieces figuratively speaking financially: One smaller sporty tool watch and another, a classy classic dressier piece, which is this Reverso.

Now, I really had a hard time finding a good copy of this most basic, traditionally sized model with a hand-wind movement. In today's standard, I'm sure I can pull off Grande Taille at 42mm L2L, but I really wanted the traditional fit. Another choice was to wait till the new 40.1mm one comes out. But again, I liked the absolute understated dial of 250.8.86 (love the black dial too but I was in the market for white dial). I guess not too many 38x23mm mechanical ones were sold in the US. I guess people either went for bigger one, or smaller one with quartz as lady's watch (my wife who is a hardcore mechanical watch girl will disapprove).

Anyway the stars finally lined up and I found a truly mint condition piece with box and paper for the price I couldn't refuse. It flew in overnight and here it is on my puny 6" wrist. 馃槈

33671326010_e54b8db615_c.jpg

Currently wearing on Nomos Shell Cordovan S size strap with JLC deployant buckle, which fits perfectly. My photo doesn't do that dial justice. I love the ever-so-slight two-tone treatment of inner and outer dial.

Looking at the watch on my wrist, I am so glad I held off and found the traditional 38mm Classique. Maybe I'd do 42mm for a complication model for fun, but for the look of traditional 2-hand model, I can't imagine going bigger for my wrist.
Edited:
 
Posts
37
Likes
19
I have the old Duoface from around 2000, so the Grande Taille size. I'm not a small guy, but with wrists a bit shy of 7.5". It certainly isn't a big watch and it gets used fairly rarely, mainly for dress, although I wore it heavily (strap shows) for business travel in years past.

As mentioned, its shape does make comparisons difficult. For example, lug to lug this guy is just shy of my 37mm Master Grand Taille, which for me wears nicely, though arguably not large either.

I've never tried on the larger reversos, but this one ain't going anywhere. And who knows, once I get a new strap it may get worn more often. (Recently serviced, btw.)

I have the same watch and have a 7 3/4" wrist and this watch fits perfectly. Never feels small. I've looked at bigger Reversos (meaning longer from 12 - 6) and they feel awkward on my wrist. As everyone's wrist is different it really is imperative to try before you buy.
 
Posts
1,369
Likes
835
try them on definitely. i have smaller wrists, and have thought about the tribute to 1931, ended up with a duo. that rectangular case sits differently
 
Posts
8,890
Likes
28,363
It only took 6 years, but last Summer (2023), I finally bought a Reverso!



The model variant is a Grande Reverso Ultra Thin, which shares the 46 x 27.5 x 7.2mm and movement of the Tribute to 1931, but with the regular case engraving and the modern silvered dial, with simple vertical striped guilloche in the dial centre, and blued steel hands.

It came on its original black crocodile strap - and I am the fourth owner. The last guy who I bought it from, said he was selling as it is a "dress watch" and he no longer wears suits so was moving it along.

I promptly took it to the JLC boutique here in London, and bought the brown Casa Fagliano polo strap and spent most of last summer (and a chunk of the winter so far) wearing it with everything from shirt sleeves, to t-shirts and once even a jacket and tie.

It took me a long time to get here, but it was worth the journey.
 
Posts
4,990
Likes
15,255
It appears to be in great shape for 3 previous owners. Congratulations on getting this gem.
 
Posts
1,585
Likes
5,096
It only took 6 years, but last Summer (2023), I finally bought a Reverso!



The model variant is a Grande Reverso Ultra Thin, which shares the 46 x 27.5 x 7.2mm and movement of the Tribute to 1931, but with the regular case engraving and the modern silvered dial, with simple vertical striped guilloche in the dial centre, and blued steel hands.

It came on its original black crocodile strap - and I am the fourth owner. The last guy who I bought it from, said he was selling as it is a "dress watch" and he no longer wears suits so was moving it along.

I promptly took it to the JLC boutique here in London, and bought the brown Casa Fagliano polo strap and spent most of last summer (and a chunk of the winter so far) wearing it with everything from shirt sleeves, to t-shirts and once even a jacket and tie.

It took me a long time to get here, but it was worth the journey.
Great choice! Looks great! Enjoy it! 馃憤
I am not sure i would be able to pull of the 46mm though. I like the same two hander but in the middle or smaller size.
 
Posts
8,890
Likes
28,363
Eve Eve
Great choice! Looks great! Enjoy it! 馃憤
I am not sure i would be able to pull of the 46mm though. I like the same two hander but in the middle or smaller size.

It鈥檚 definitely on the larger end of the Reverso spectrum, but being thin means it doesn鈥檛 feel particularly large, so worth trying one on if you were ever considering.

I got to handle a few precious metal grand complications from the mid 2000s a little while back - those things feel huge, probably down to their thickness and the weight of the precious metals!
 
Posts
9,960
Likes
15,640
Bravo Chris, that looks truly lovely, welcome to an exclusive club. After years of looking I got a Duo at the right price a while back and haven't regretted it one bit. It's a lovely thing and feels very special on the wrist. I can't rock the very biggest models comfortably, mine is GT size (42x26mm) and is about the max that will work for me but if you have the wrists for the biggest then that's what you should go for surely.
 
Posts
4,990
Likes
15,255
In my earlier research I was surprised to find that the 8yr warranty was transferable on these, so depending on the age of your watch (and if the extended warranty was enabled) you may have some free extra insurance.
 
Posts
13,163
Likes
52,295
Reminds me. I need to get a new dressed down strap for mine. Nice piece.
 
Posts
8,890
Likes
28,363
In my earlier research I was surprised to find that the 8yr warranty was transferable on these, so depending on the age of your watch (and if the extended warranty was enabled) you may have some free extra insurance.

This one predates the extended warranty sadly!