- Posts
- 74
- Likes
- 10
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
What is the significance of this? Did I say something wrong?
Meaning once you state you consider these easy breezy adjustments and you have the case opener and the drivers it's difficult to believe you're not doing what you yourself say you are. That's what I mean. Same as its difficult to believe that case is opened twice when it was set and running -10 then +10 then 3 and now 1.
But I insist, there is NOTHING wrong with doing anything to your watch. It's your watch. We just caution you as to the consequences both towards the watch and towards the perception any buyer may have from your practices.
I know it's all coming off as a beating but we're trying to help.
I've had it opened twice. They can't take two openings?
I can get it replaced when I get home, if need be. Surprising they are that delicate!
Some of them are, some of them aren't. Al will tell us for sure, but most of the time you're supposed to change them every time the watch is opened.
Tom
Further to my last post, my Speedmaster loses 12 seconds in 24-hours. And the sweep seconds hand has the same slightly "jerky" motion that you describe. Mine has behaved like this for a long time, but I don't sweat it. Every watch I own has its own quirks, and I would go crazy worrying about all those watches and all those quirks.
Actually, this report was based on having mis-read my accurate time source when I set the Speedmaster Professional. I re-set it later that same day (3 or 4 days ago), and since then it has picked up 5 seconds! These may not be rated as chronometers, but I am pleased with the time mine keeps! The "jerky" seconds hand, however, persists. I know the solution for that, but based on a 1 to 10 severity rating, this problem is worth about a .05 in my opinion.
What causes the "jerky" seconds hand?
Well, in that case (no pun intended), I'll have the case reopened and a new gasket put in just to be safe. I'll do that when I get back in a couple of weeks. For now, I'll make sure not to subject it to any water. It might get a little sweat, but that should be all!
If the O-ring is new, and has been properly lubricated before tightening, then it might be fine. The key is lubrication for a new gasket - the lubrication is not there to help seal the watch, but to make sure that the O-ring does not bunch up or get stretched when the case back is tightened down - this is what can ruin a new gasket. Of course over time they can be flattened, loose their elasticity (so they turn brittle), and eventually turn to black goop.
A hard plastic case back seal is a different animal - these are found for example in the Speedmaster automatic watches with the 7750 based movement, and the case back presses on. These gaskets rely on deformation to provide the tension to hold the case back in place, and they are one time use only.
Cheers, Al
Is this lubrication something one can do at home with vaseline or cooking oil?.... Just anticipating possible issues. 😎
Note that this "jerky" sweep hand is a completely different issue from the one described by the OP.
My view is that although it's not something that will cause damage, it's certainly not right if it's jerky. It's not something I would live with for sure (it means the chronograph can't be used accurately) but again it's not something that will damage the watch, so it's not urgent in that way...
Cheers, Al
It's weird - when it jumps forward at the beginning by, say, 1/2 of a second, it freezes for the same amount of time it jumped forward (or so it seems), so I think it actually is keeping accurate time.
When I get home, I'll film a slow motion video with the iPhone and attach it!
I did notice that on the first video you posted. It's a little jump and then it's like it waits the equivalent time to catch up