- Posts
- 9
- Likes
- 0
60's Constellation pie pan with arrow markers - genuine?
- Posts
- 9,885
- Likes
- 55,924
gbesq
·Do you have a reference number for the case or a serial number from the movement?
- Posts
- 9
- Likes
- 0
sirepsyer
·Do you have a reference number for the case or a serial number from the movement?
Edit: The seller later confirmed that the reference is 2852-4 sc, 24 jewels cal. 505, and the watch is from 1958, not the 60s.
Edited:
- Posts
- 2,086
- Likes
- 2,897
OMEGuy
·I would suspect this watch is from the 1950s.
Well, at least the crown is wrong.
Well, at least the crown is wrong.
- Posts
- 2,786
- Likes
- 6,906
seekingseaquest
·Looks like a 2852 from the mid to late 50s
- Posts
- 2,086
- Likes
- 2,897
OMEGuy
·Looks like a 2852 from the mid to late 50s
I would have thought of a ref. 2652.
- Posts
- 2,786
- Likes
- 6,906
seekingseaquest
·I believe most (all?) of the pie pans were 2852s. The bumpers only came in dome dials I think?
- Posts
- 278
- Likes
- 1,384
miramogge
·From what I can see the dial looks genuine anyways
- Posts
- 1,258
- Likes
- 2,737
harrymai86
·It should be a 2852 gold capped.
- Posts
- 2,086
- Likes
- 2,897
OMEGuy
·I believe most (all?) of the pie pans were 2852s. The bumpers only came in dome dials I think?
Well, it's been a hard week and maybe you're right. More likely to be a ref. 2852, yes.
https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/vintage-omega-constellation-2652-1790343109
- Posts
- 5,000
- Likes
- 18,558
Shabbaz
·Nice one. What's the asking?
- Posts
- 9,588
- Likes
- 27,696
ConElPueblo
·Ref. 2652 has a screw-down caseback, so that's out of the question. When comparing bumper autos such as ref. 2782 with a ref. 2852, you can tell by the slightly taller snap-on caseback that it is a full-rotor automatic 😀
- Posts
- 2,086
- Likes
- 2,897
OMEGuy
·Ref. 2652 has a screw-down caseback, so that's out of the question. When comparing bumper autos such as ref. 2782 with a ref. 2852, you can tell by the slightly taller snap-on caseback that it is a full-rotor automatic 😀
If anyone told me there were no wonderful watch fans here, I would call him crazy. 😀
- Posts
- 2,786
- Likes
- 6,906
seekingseaquest
·Ref. 2652 has a screw-down caseback, so that's out of the question. When comparing bumper autos such as ref. 2782 with a ref. 2852, you can tell by the slightly taller snap-on caseback that it is a full-rotor automatic 😀
- Posts
- 9,588
- Likes
- 27,696
ConElPueblo
·Do you know if any 2652s or 2782s came with pie pan dials?
Eh... Not at the top of my head. I believe that the all gold DeLuxe ones have?
- Posts
- 10,526
- Likes
- 16,450
padders
··Oooo subtitles!Deffo not 1960s, as the guys say above most likely a mid-late '50s 2852. Note the spelling of Chronometre. This places it as no later than about 1958 (I forget the exact cutoff, see Desmond's site for info), the spelling changed to meter in the late '50s. That dial didn't AFAIK make it into the 60s, the lug design not much beyond 1961 when the dog legs took over.
Edited:
- Posts
- 9
- Likes
- 0
- Posts
- 2,086
- Likes
- 2,897
- Posts
- 9
- Likes
- 0
sirepsyer
·Dear all, thank you so much for all your help!
The seller has confirmed that the reference is 2852-4 sc, 24 jewel cal. 505, and the watch is from 1958, not the 60s.
The seller has confirmed that the reference is 2852-4 sc, 24 jewel cal. 505, and the watch is from 1958, not the 60s.
- Posts
- 9
- Likes
- 0
