39.5 PO... the perfect Planet Ocean

Posts
57
Likes
37
I agree that the 39.5mm PO is a good size. My wrist is about 7 5/8" and it fits pretty well. My watches range in size between a 36"mm Datejust to a 42mm Speedmaster. I had a Heuer 85th Birthday watch, which is nearly 43mm, and that was too much for me. The PO dial has a lot of dimension and detail that I like but, for some reason, it hasn't received any sustained wrist time lately. I either need to start wearing it again or send it to another home...
Having worn a blue Bond Seamaster 300m for over 15 years, I really want a black dial Planet Ocean 39.5mm for something a little different. I’ve got to say the pictures you’ve taken of the blue dial Planet Ocean 39.5mm make the watch look incredible
 
Posts
19
Likes
10
The PO is beautiful. I really can't do anything with a lug to lug over 46mm, the SKX is right at my upper limit (6.5 inch round wrists resembling chicken drumsticks) I've wanted one since 2012, soon, soon I may spring for one...
 
Posts
17,639
Likes
26,756
The PO is beautiful. I really can't do anything with a lug to lug over 46mm, the SKX is right at my upper limit (6.5 inch round wrists resembling chicken drumsticks) I've wanted one since 2012, soon, soon I may spring for one...
You can just go way oversized also, try thick natos and 42mm larger then SKX pieces. My GF with tiny wrists can wear watches larger then me lol.
Edited:
 
Posts
819
Likes
3,447
I traded my 42mm stainless PO with the 8500 movement for the same watch in titanium. I love the thing. I find it extremely comfortable. Shirt cuffs are irrelevant to me. I only have to get dressed up for weddings and funerals so If I have to wear a dress shirt, I’ll wear my OP Date. I wish I had purchased this watch a long time ago. It would have saved me lots of money trading around....
 
Posts
1,530
Likes
3,589
These smaller PO's suffer from being too squat\unbalanced, that said they are not the size of dive watch I would consider in any case.
Edited:
 
Posts
355
Likes
392
It's a really pretty watch, but I still prefer my watches (even dive watches) to be thinner, like the old SMP or Sub. I'm not into this whole "wrist presence" thing.

I’m right there with you. I don’t care for watches that sit too tall. They feel out of proportion. This is more comfortable and better proportioned IMO.
Edited:
 
Posts
1
Likes
0
Plenty of pice here but I just can't tell if the date wheel is blue to 'match' the dial on the 215.30.40.20.03.001. Can anybody who owns the blue model please advise if the date wheel's blue - or is it black? TVM
 
Posts
212
Likes
658
a 39,5 PO is a 38 equivalent diver, you may always rest 1,5MM to a PO to ´SEE/FEEL´ its size. This is due to asymmetric case, be care with this.
 
Posts
214
Likes
363
Some interesting reading here.

I think I'm going to pull the trigger on a 42mm 8500
 
Posts
57
Likes
37
Some interesting reading here.

I think I'm going to pull the trigger on a 42mm 8500

How big are your wrists?

Mine are 17cm and the Planet Ocean 39.5mm I eventually purchased in January 2020 is a great fit! (see image)

If you have a similar wrist size to mine I’d recommend trying on the 39.5mm 8800, 42mm 8500 and the 43.5mm 8900 to find your best fit.

Good luck!
 
Posts
44
Likes
78
How big are your wrists?

Mine are 17cm and the Planet Ocean 39.5mm I eventually purchased in January 2020 is a great fit! (see image)

If you have a similar wrist size to mine I’d recommend trying on the 39.5mm 8800, 42mm 8500 and the 43.5mm 8900 to find your best fit.

Good luck!

7 inch Flat wrist here and the 39.5mm is by far the most comfortable PO I've worn. I've owned both the 2500 in a 42 as well as the 8500 in a 43.5. Great sizes and filled the wrist nicely, BUT far to heavy and clunky for an everyday watch.
 
Posts
57
Likes
37
7 inch Flat wrist here and the 39.5mm is by far the most comfortable PO I've worn. I've owned both the 2500 in a 42 as well as the 8500 in a 43.5. Great sizes and filled the wrist nicely, BUT far to heavy and clunky for an everyday watch.

I spent the best part of 4 years trying to make my mind up about which particular Omega to go for. In that time I tried on the following watches:

Planet Ocean 8500 in 42mm
Planet Ocean 8500 in 45.5mm
Seamaster 300m 2500 in 41mm
Aqua Terra 8500 in 38.5mm
Seamaster 300 Master Co-Axial in 41mm
Planet Ocean 8800 in 39.5mm
Planet Ocean 8900 in 43.5mm
Seamaster 300m 8800 in 42mm

Anything over 41mm tended to look too big on my 6.88 inch/17.5cm wrist. The idea was to have a more modern, larger Omega dive watch than the Seamaster 300m midsize in 36.25mm I’d worn on my wrist every day for over 15 years.

The one watch I always came back to over that 4 year period was the Planet Ocean 8800 in 39.5mm. My only criticism of the watch itself in terms of its dimensions is the lug-to-lug sizing of 45mm.

The lug- to-lug sizing really needs to be between 46-47mm for this watch. I’d probably say 46.5mm would be absolutely perfect. I expect the 4th generation of the Planet Ocean to be released in 2021/2022 and hopefully the lug-to-lug sizing will be increased on the smaller Planet Ocean in that line-up.
 
Posts
127
Likes
355
7 inch Flat wrist here and the 39.5mm is by far the most comfortable PO I've worn. I've owned both the 2500 in a 42 as well as the 8500 in a 43.5. Great sizes and filled the wrist nicely, BUT far to heavy and clunky for an everyday watch.

My wrist is around the same size, possibly a smidge bigger and quite flat also. I have the 43.5mm, the lugs sit nicely between the edges of my wrist so definitely not stupidly sized in that regard. However I agree with your statement, it is just too big and heavy for a daily wearer.

I think the biggest I'd probably want to go for as a daily would be the current seamaster pro 42mm, which I tried on last year. I'm toying with the idea of flipping my PO and getting the new white dial SMP. However, I do love the quick hour set you get on the 8900 movement in the 43.5mm PO.

I'm worried I'll miss the PO if flip it. I just don't know if I want another omega in my collection, as I've already got the PO and a 2500 SMP, which I got for a very good price so don't really care that much about and use it for work etc.
 
Posts
103
Likes
265
7” wrist and 39.5 PO and SMP 2500. I feel the SMP is the ideal size watch for my wrist. I sometimes wish the PO was just a touch wider in diameter, maybe a true 40mm. But, then I imagine that the 43.5 would be too thick for a daily.
My wrist is around the same size, possibly a smidge bigger and quite flat also. I have the 43.5mm, the lugs sit nicely between the edges of my wrist so definitely not stupidly sized in that regard. However I agree with your statement, it is just too big and heavy for a daily wearer.

I think the biggest I'd probably want to go for as a daily would be the current seamaster pro 42mm, which I tried on last year. I'm toying with the idea of flipping my PO and getting the new white dial SMP. However, I do love the quick hour set you get on the 8900 movement in the 43.5mm PO.

I'm worried I'll miss the PO if flip it. I just don't know if I want another omega in my collection, as I've already got the PO and a 2500 SMP, which I got for a very good price so don't really care that much about and use it for work etc.

 
Posts
57
Likes
37
7” wrist and 39.5 PO and SMP 2500. I feel the SMP is the ideal size watch for my wrist. I sometimes wish the PO was just a touch wider in diameter, maybe a true 40mm. But, then I imagine that the 43.5 would be too thick for a daily.


The dimensions on the Planet Ocean 39.5mm are 39mm bezel diameter and 40mm case diameter. For all intents and purposes it is a 40mm dive watch. But the 45mm lug-to-lug diameter makes it feel smaller. I mentioned in an earlier post that ideally the lug-to-lug sizing needs to be between 46mm-47mm. Apparently Omega’s idea to make the lug-to-lug diameter smaller at 45mm was to make the watch sit more centrally on the wrist. Personally, I see the Planet Ocean 39.5mm as the most direct rival to the Rolex Submariner 116610LN. If the lug-to-lug diameter was slightly larger it would ‘wear the crown’ so to speak.

By the way, your SMP 300m 2500 looks great! I prefer these black dial pre-ceramic’s as they look more versatile. I still wear my mid-size most days.
 
Posts
785
Likes
650
After two 2500 PO's I ended up with a 300mc. I get to keep the classic styling, matte dial along with the modern tech. The stated thickness is a little deceiving due to the domed crystal. Brush the PCL's and you're in business.
 
Posts
103
Likes
265
After two 2500 PO's I ended up with a 300mc. I get to keep the classic styling, matte dial along with the modern tech. The stated thickness is a little deceiving due to the domed crystal. Brush the PCL's and you're in business.

That 300MC is a great looking piece. I purchased a SMP Wave Dial in 2013 lost it, and just found another great one from a seller in Japan. I really like the fine wave dial compared to the bold wave on the current model. My bet is Omega will start to revert to the mean on next releases of PO and SMP.
 
Posts
894
Likes
2,802
After two 2500 PO's I ended up with a 300mc. I get to keep the classic styling, matte dial along with the modern tech. The stated thickness is a little deceiving due to the domed crystal. Brush the PCL's and you're in business.
Recently did the same to mine, in fact i think it was one of your posts on another thread that influenced me.
 
Posts
57
Likes
37
I have tried on the Seamaster 300 Master Co-Axial and the polished centre links spoil its retro design. With the polished centre links brushed instead, the watch looks great. It’s no coincidence the bracelet included in the Spectre limited edition of the Seamaster 300 Master Co-Axial comes with brushed centre links.